donalg1 wrote: » The relevance of this to the HHC is what exactly? Or do you always have to insist on dragging things off topic, I believe there have been warnings about this by the Mods before, and I also believe there is a thread for this in the golf forum so maybe that would be the best place to discuss this. Or do you prefer to do your trolling here?
donalg1 wrote: » Are you the type of lad that insists on joining other peoples three balls or two balls because you have no one else to play with, despite the fact that they have no desire to spend their one free day a week playing golf with some lad they dont know or dont ever want to know?
Hijpo wrote: » You'll notice my reply, aside from 3 words, was completely on topic. I was curious and a yes/no answer would have been sufficient. However, Im sure mods would appreciate it if long winded off topic posts be kept to the relevant forums. Perhaps "there is a thread for this in the golf forum so maybe that would be the best place to discuss this" hmm?? So has our government decided how many houses are liable yet? How many more services are they planning on distancing themselves from yet charge us for?
donalg1 wrote: » Are you the type of lad that insists on joining other peoples three balls or two balls because you have no one else to play with,
Hijpo wrote: » nice move, so now with your details they can stick you for water rates AND property tax, and when the council get to set the rates you will have no choice or power to fight against whatever amount of money THEY decide to take, not how much you can afford to give.
Am Chile wrote: » Before they try to charge people for water-the water meter installation is due to begin in the summer, before any water notices are sent out to people, The battle next summer should be to stop Water Meters being installed. Resistance needs to be at a local level, estates of local people working together to prevent access to the installers-whos in and whos out next summer ?
donalg1 wrote: » Thats all good and well stopping people from installing meters to your house but what happens when they cut your water off as a result? What then?
Am Chile wrote: » It will be switched back on by volenteers like it was during the last anti water rates campaign.
donalg1 wrote: » Illegally of course sounds like a wonderful plan
tayto lover wrote: » Yes i know that. My point was that CAHWT should have taken a test case on behalf of a single property (home) owner and not be relying on this guy who owns multiple properties.
Mr CJ wrote: » I am surprised RTE mentioned this http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/1220/high-court-challenge-to-household-charge-begins.html
donalg1 wrote: » Why is it you insist on mentioning golf almost everytime you reply to me, you want to bring it off topic it seems (or at least that is all I can assume). So you do grasp that the relevant place to discuss golf would be the golf forum then do you? Is it safe to assume that you will therefore leave the golf talk out of the HHC thread from now on? Or is that asking too much? Yes and No answers will be sufficient, theres a good fella.
Hijpo wrote: » http://waterfordwhispersnews.com/2013/01/02/ireland-immediately-writes-off-own-debt-in-first-day-of-eu-presidency/ ITS ALL OVER!!! HURRA!!
Robbo wrote: » Crank litigants are usually only mentioned in passing. When someone takes a case as a lay litigant naming Tom, Dick and Harry as defendants and shouting the odds about human rights and the Constitution, it's only going to end one way.
Ghandee wrote: » If Mark McCrystal had of taken that attitude......
Izzy Skint wrote: » Kenny the liar spouting more bull**** lies again....what a load of effing bull**** spin we have to listen to day in day out....f off kenny...f off rte..f off labour...f off fine gael...f off the revenue....I WILL HUNGER STRIKE LIKE MY FELLOW CORK MEN TOMAS McCurtain and Terence McCsweeney did before me....they may come to my front door to threaten me, and if they do ......SOME UNLUCKY PUBLIC SERVICE BISTARD WILL PAY THE ULTIMATE PRICE ....
Am Chile wrote: » Happy new year to all non payers--for year one non payment of the flat rate property tax was higher then year one regarding non payment of the poll tax is the uk--Most of the 700.000 that boycotted the flat rate property tax last year, never attended any public meetings, never attended any local protests or national protests--while it was all good just passively boycotting staying at home,if people are serious about getting it overturned--I say to people here who passively boycotted the flat rate property tax, in this new year there will be many public meetings on the value based property tax by Sinn fein, and the anti property tax campaign, do your best to attend as many public meetings as possbile, any ideas you have put them forward at these public meetings, and try to attend any local and national protests this year.
Vizzy wrote: » Isn't this the way the anti-HHC believe that it will all end ?
Robbo wrote: » I raise you Isaac Wunder.
tayto lover wrote: » I'd believe the bit about Gilmour buying the carpet though
Ghandee wrote: » Was it red? (to make his grand exit)
Ghandee wrote: » I don't know enough about Mr Keegan's background. It will make for an interesting court case, I don't see how you could claim an 'Issac Wunder' without first knowing anything about the man. I know a lot of folk dismissed McCrystal before his day in court.
Hijpo wrote: » Again with the entire off topic golf post? :rolleyes:
Was is not against the law last time?
donalg1 wrote: » Yes and I see you failed to answer my questions, Hijpo I am only following your lead by discussing golf here you seem to think its the place to do it, I have pointed out to you a thousand times before that its not really the place, you cant seem to grasp this concept for some reason only known to yourself I imagine. Its ok though if you keep trying I am sure you will understand some day. Now I will ask again. Why do you insist on talking about golf here? Do you realise that this is not the place for discussing golf? Do you think you will be able to keep your posts on topic from now on? Again yes or no will do. (I wont hold my breath though)
donalg1 wrote: » Whats your point, are you saying because a law was broken once its ok to break it again? Love the way all the anti side lads think its ok to consistently break the law, I mean there is Am Chile in one post telling people to break the law and in the very next one telling them to break a different a law, two post two illegal activities recommended, and you wonder why people dont listen to the anti side.:rolleyes:
Hijpo wrote: » Its amazing how the pro side just fall into line, at this rate anything could be passed into law and it would be accepted just because "its the law". What if they passed a law that said "To curb the increase in population and reduce the cost of childrens allowance and healthcare for kids on the state, couples are only allowed have 1 child and when males get to the age of 30 they must be castrated. However politicians and anyone earning over 100k are exempt from this law, aswell as any foreign national who is still entitled to claim full childrens allowance even for children not born in or living in this country, who only exist on paper that can be easily forged, its the law" id say youd be first in the cue with your own scissors and a smile.
Hijpo wrote: » lol still with the golf :rolleyes: FOUR!!!! My point is that it was against the law before, they did the moral thing for there fellow citizens. Just because you say "Oh but thats against the law" doesnt mean there are suddenly going to say "jaysus it is, better not touch it so" Its amazing how the pro side just fall into line, at this rate anything could be passed into law and it would be accepted just because "its the law". What if they passed a law that said "To curb the increase in population and reduce the cost of childrens allowance and healthcare for kids on the state, couples are only allowed have 1 child and when males get to the age of 30 they must be castrated. However politicians and anyone earning over 100k are exempt from this law, aswell as any foreign national who is still entitled to claim full childrens allowance even for children not born in or living in this country, who only exist on paper that can be easily forged, its the law" id say youd be first in the cue with your own scissors and a smile.
Ghandee wrote: » What you have to remember is, that a lot of the folk advocating payment of the hhc/pt on these threads are in the PS/CS, Hijpo. If the money isn't there, they might have to suffer salary cuts in line with the mortals in the private sector, increments might have to be froze, the sky might fall down:eek: etc etc etc. It'd be like me telling my customers not to buy from me/my company. Without that b stream of revenue, my income might well take another hit too. Its the law? Our politicians don't do everything by the book either less we forget.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wf.vanillicon.com/v2/f054c80ff399c4eba8d719c617220a57.svg)
