Home Reposessed??

Very sorry to hear this OP, for what its worth I know 3 different couples (well two couples one singleton) and they are in the same boat. I didnt want to pry but I know for certain that one of the couples were many months behind and were paying nothing to the bank, however the last thing the bank wanted was to repossess so they came up with a mutual payment plan where they pay only as much as they can afford, in their case it is literally only 20% of the full mortgage payment and it is on a rolling basis reviewed every 3-6months,now this is way below even the interest portion of the loan and I was very surprised to hear the Bank have accepted it but apparently they will work with you if you are upfront with them. As for the other couple they have just resigned themselves to the process and are completely ignoring the bank,in a way though I can see why because they have emigrated so they just dont care about their house or credit rating in Ireland. The single girl I know of is also just paying what she can afford (I dont know how much that is to be honest) but she is way behind,no move from the bank on her as yet. My advice is if you have any interest in your home is to talk to the bank,the last thing they want is your house.

juanbob

hi just wondering about home repo im going through a very rough time here with my family we know the house is going to be reposessed,but when is the question a fella came to the door yesterday and new my name and the wifes name and was looking to see was the house occupied or vacant said he was from the bank is this a part of the reposession stage

Milk & Honey

juanbob wrote: »

hi just wondering about home repo im going through a very rough time here with my family we know the house is going to be reposessed,but when is the question a fella came to the door yesterday and new my name and the wifes name and was looking to see was the house occupied or vacant said he was from the bank is this a part of the reposession stage

Quite likely. If they are preparing for court they will have to swear an affidavit stating who is in the house.

D3PO

sorry ro hear that op but i must ask.why you are prioritiaing other bills over your mortgage ? im.pretty sure mabs and anybody else u contact will advise u to pay mortgage first and other bills after.

mickm86

does anyone know what exactly is involved in the repossesion process if both bank and home owner are in agreement?? thanks.

Procrastastudy

mickm86 wrote: »

does anyone know what exactly is involved in the repossesion process if both bank and home owner are in agreement?? thanks.

Bank sell you get nice big debt and no house. Speak to a solicitor before taking any action. You'll have to anyway in all likelihood due to requirements of independent advice.

cookie1977

Contact

http://www.newbeginning.ie/

ASAP and ask them to help. They're very busy but they prioritise cases depending on circumstances.

http://www.centralbank.ie/press-area/press-releases/pages/residentialmortgagearrearsandrepossessionsstatisticsq22012.aspx

Q3 2012

there have been little or no repos thus far so why would anybody bother to make up arrears - i mean seriously why would you bother?

cookie1977

The IMF is applying pressure on the government to allow for more repossessions. They see it as a way of sorting out the economy and finally drawing a line under the banks bad loans. I would not ignore the situation but rather look at the options and see what's best for you. If going to the UK to live and declare bankruptcy is the best option then so be it but dont ignore the situation. seek advice.
Q2 2012

A total of 146 properties were taken into possession by lenders during the quarter, of which 44 were repossessed on foot of a Court Order, while the remaining 102 were voluntarily surrendered or abandoned.

A total of 154 properties were taken into possession by lenders during the quarter, of which 47 were repossessed on foot of a Court Order, while the remaining 107 were voluntarily surrendered or abandoned.

http://www.centralbank.ie/press-area/press-releases/Pages/MortgageArrearsandRepossessionStatisticsQ32012.aspx

Senna

How many PPR have been repossessed when the arrears only started in 2007/2008? My guess would be none. Its not in the banks interest, the owners are still liable for the debt and (as said above) even 20% of the mortgage is better than none. Reposes the house and the family have to pay rent somewhere else.

If I was in this position, I would be making payments of €100/€200 per month and my priority would be providing for my family rather than making payments to the bank.

cookie1977

The above states are ppr and not btl. Thhey're separate but are broken down on the site. They don't breakdown how long people were in arrears before proceedings were taken as far as I can see but I think it comes down to ability to repay long term wise. Details of those numbers in arrears and for how long can be seen here:

http://www.centralbank.ie/polstats/stats/mortgagearrears/Pages/Data.aspx

there's safety in numbers out there, i read last week that 65,700 mortgages were in arrears of 90 days or more. That's a lot of mortgages.

i think the strategy from the Govt/Banks/NAMA point of view is that if repos happen it will be buy to let only initially.

only when totally forced to do so by the IMF will the Govt/Banks begin the long drawn out process of repos on main residences, but there will be no fire sales as the illusion of stable property prices and therefore stable loan books of the nationalised banks must be maintained at all costs.

it's all a delicate house of cards, the IMF have spotted the high court 'oversight' of preventing repos on pre 2009 mortgages and this now threatens the house of cards.

so the banks may reposes but i reckon NAMA will take over the repoed properties like it has done with 10,000's of other properties and restrict supply to the market, thereb y giving the illusion of rising or stable property prices when in fact the game is rigged.

Look at rents in Dublin - why doesn't NAMA release the apts it has in Dublin to ease the demand for accommodation?

high rents must be maintained to allow banks to keep money rolling in on BTL gaffs.

Tigger

who_ru wrote: »

there's safety in numbers out there, i read last week that 65,700 mortgages were in arrears of 90 days or more. That's a lot of mortgages.

i think the strategy from the Govt/Banks/NAMA point of view is that if repos happen it will be buy to let only initially.

only when totally forced to do so by the IMF will the Govt/Banks begin the long drawn out process of repos on main residences, but there will be no fire sales as the illusion of stable property prices and therefore stable loan books of the nationalised banks must be maintained at all costs.

it's all a delicate house of cards, the IMF have spotted the high court 'oversight' of preventing repos on pre 2009 mortgages and this now threatens the house of cards.

so the banks may reposes but i reckon NAMA will take over the repoed properties like it has done with 10,000's of other properties and restrict supply to the market, thereb y giving the illusion of rising or stable property prices when in fact the game is rigged.

Look at rents in Dublin - why doesn't NAMA release the apts it has in Dublin to ease the demand for accommodation?

high rents must be maintained to allow banks to keep money rolling in on BTL gaffs.

Well written post
The same applies on commercial properties I can't get my rent down even tho there are tens of suitable premises within 200m of my current location

The reason is Nama will not drop apparent value by renting out these units and would rather they rot than let me pay 10 - 15 thousand a year into what is basically the exchequer

It's all your own fault Irish people, you need to pay as much as you can back as it's what you owe and it's your duty. Then, once you are able to you should resume paying back the rest of your agreed debt. Even if it takes your whole lifetime. Anyone who refuses to pay and sticks their head in the sand should leave Ireland and never come back.

themadchef

lima wrote: »

It's all your own fault Irish people, you need to pay as much as you can back as it's what you owe and it's your duty. Then, once you are able to you should resume paying back the rest of your agreed debt. Even if it takes your whole lifetime. Anyone who refuses to pay and sticks their head in the sand should leave Ireland and never come back.

How is the view from up there on that high horse of yours?

People in alot of countries are in alot of trouble, not just Ireland.

I love this recession for one reason. It has taught us the value of each other. The price we paid for bricks and mortar was high but the price of listening to people like you wag your finger for eternity is alot worse. We can never pay that back.

Probaby too young to get a mortgage and got away lucky...

I dont have a Celtic tiger mortage fwiw, but i pity those who do.

Back on your horse and stop picking over the bones of the aleredy broken.

Hope you have a lovely Christmas guys and dont let the begrudgers get yee down.

I agree there will be no fire sales of distressed mortgages . Can you imagine if 67000 homes were repossessed? Property would be practically worthless and of course all these people also have to be rehoused if they are not in a position to buy another property due to the negative equity. Another massive bill the state can ill afford . It's not that the banks/government actually give a **** about your circumstance, it's simply about keeping some semblance of a housing market intact. If you are in trouble just play ball with your bank for as much as you are comfortable with , even if that is a token amount, it will give them a choice, and most likely that choice will involve you staying put.
If you have given up and want out then don't engage by all means but remember you still owe them if there is neg equity when you hand back your keys.
Think of it as a game if it makes it easier to comprehend , the banks must feel they are in control of the game , when you opt out they lose control, this is not what they want!
If you want to keep your family home you must engage!

Mad chef, I am pretty sure Lima is taking the piss with his post ! He is not serious.

youtube! wrote: »

Mad chef, I am pretty sure Lima is taking the piss with his post ! He is not serious.

I'm totally serious

lima wrote: »

I'm totally serious

Find something better to do with your time.

who_ru wrote: »

Find something better to do with your time.

Types like you destroyed the place in the first place.

People who took out mortgages were taking a risk. Risk works both ways - time for consequences. I'm sure you want the Quinns to pay back their debt so why not all you lot that inflated the country in the first place.

Repossessions need to happen. I'm on standby to buy my first home, hoping to get one of those repos, that's just the way the world works.

who_ru wrote: »

there's safety in numbers out there, i read last week that 65,700 mortgages were in arrears of 90 days or more. That's a lot of mortgages.

i think the strategy from the Govt/Banks/NAMA point of view is that if repos happen it will be buy to let only initially.

only when totally forced to do so by the IMF will the Govt/Banks begin the long drawn out process of repos on main residences, but there will be no fire sales as the illusion of stable property prices and therefore stable loan books of the nationalised banks must be maintained at all costs.

it's all a delicate house of cards, the IMF have spotted the high court 'oversight' of preventing repos on pre 2009 mortgages and this now threatens the house of cards.

so the banks may reposes but i reckon NAMA will take over the repoed properties like it has done with 10,000's of other properties and restrict supply to the market, thereb y giving the illusion of rising or stable property prices when in fact the game is rigged.

Look at rents in Dublin - why doesn't NAMA release the apts it has in Dublin to ease the demand for accommodation?

high rents must be maintained to allow banks to keep money rolling in on BTL gaffs.

You are dead right, but the fact is this makes me sick to the stomach. It should function as normal capitalism and I should be able to get a big house for 70k. I want to buy now, but with restrictions like this it means that houses are artificially high, even at todays low low prices. Supply and demand needs to be normalised, not fixed.

lima wrote: »

You are dead right, but the fact is this makes me sick to the stomach. It should function as normal capitalism and I should be able to get a big house for 70k. I want to buy now, but with restrictions like this it means that houses are artificially high, even at todays low low prices. Supply and demand needs to be normalised, not fixed.

Omg I thought you were doing your mario rosenstock impression with your quip!
People like you are scary! As a matter of interest where are you from? I wonder is it an east European country by any chance ?

Zamboni

I keep hearing this argument about the state will have to house all these evictees and it will cost a fortune blah, blah, blah but I've yet to see anyone put comprehensive figures on the scenario that would back it up.
Just because a mortgagee cannot afford mortgage repayments on celtic tiger houses does not equate to them not being able to afford rental payments.
Even if they take the negative equity with them, no court in this country will jail a single soul for non-payment of left over debt from a repossessed property.

There are unemployed people sitting in beautiful houses in locations in South East Dublin, that should really be sitting in apartments or corpo gafs west of the M50.
It sounds awful, but that is natural course of life.
The repossession moratorium is probably the worst economical decision made by a govt since the bank guarantee.

Zamboni wrote: »

There are unemployed people sitting in beautiful houses in locations in South East Dublin, that should really be sitting in apartments or corpo gafs west of the M50.
It sounds awful, but that is natural course of life.
The repossession moratorium is probably the worst economical decision made by a govt since the bank guarantee.

it would happen almost everywhere else in the world. people must accept the reality of their new situation and that 'owning' something that cannot be paid for is not how things should work.

but this is Ireland, politicians are defined by cowardice and self interest.

khards

Zamboni wrote: »

I keep hearing this argument about the state will have to house all these evictees and it will cost a fortune blah, blah, blah but I've yet to see anyone put comprehensive figures on the scenario that would back it up.

Think of it like this. As long as the state does not get involved and transferrs the repossessed properties to NAMA then the supply of empty (newly repossessed) houses would match the rental demand on an almost 1 to 1 basis.
I can therefore conclude that property and rental prices would be brought down to a true market value which would be much cheaper than today.
If Rent Supplement was abolished at the same time then you might even end up saving the state money.
The only problem with the above is that it would more than likely collapse the banks, therefore the best time to enact a plan like this would be on the breakup of the currency.

youtube! wrote: »

Omg I thought you were doing your mario rosenstock impression with your quip!
People like you are scary! As a matter of interest where are you from? I wonder is it an east European country by any chance ?

I am 100% from Dublin. I assure you this is my opinion. Recently returned to this island from living abroad most of the time you all thought you were rich. Like it or not you bought in a game and lost the game. Now I may have to help bail you out? I remember everyone in 2005 sneering at me because I wasn't interested in 'getting on the ladder'. Time to pay your debts people and let nature take its course.

Mrs OBumble

I wouldn't phrase it quite the same way, but I actually agree with Iima on a number of points.

Everything here seems to be someone else's fault - foreigners, culchies, politicians, the government, the church, the banks, the English, the Vikings, whoever.

Almost no one is expected to take responsibility for the consequences of their own actions or decisions. And the bigger gombeen someone is, the more likely they will be elected to something.

Banks did not force anyone to sign mortgages. They offered excessive loan amounts and idiots took them. Non-idiots didn't (and yes, I've met more than a few people who tell of taking a far smaller amount than they were offered.)

Actions have consequences.