Meesared wrote: » Stephen Donellys budget has been widely dismissed as completely unworkable, the budget we have is a decent one given the situation we are in.
stephen_n wrote: » How were high earners hit in an equivelant sense to the vulnerable in society, how were they even hit compared to the middle class? I drive a twelve year old car worth 1,000 euros yet I will pay the more road tax as someone who just a 70,000 Mercedes and that is fair how? How were those earning over 100k a year effected in the same way as those on minimum wage by this budget? I made it quite clear who I will vote for actually if you bothered reading my post. Clearly you are quite well off as I know that €10 or €20 would make a massive difference to me. There are plenty of people living paycheck to paycheck who for that sort of money will probably miss a meal, but sure you keep believing the right wing media bull**** that the rich are paying their fair share! Doctors and dentists are luxury items for me, yet we will pay 3.5 billion for the debts of the rich, who live on rediculous pensions unaffected by their excess. You sound far more like a Fianna Fáil voter than a labour voter anyway!
stephen_n wrote: » Tell that to the family's with sick children who saw the drug payment scheme further increased, while they had their children's allowance cut by the lying Labour Party, who campaigned based on it not being touched. Who widely dismissed it? As opposed to Stephen Donnelly who is actually a highly qualified economist!
MYOB wrote: » Tallaght doesn't get to vote for Stephen Donnelly. Are you going to move to Wicklow? editWe don't have a right-wing media, we have a reactionary media that happens to tie in exactly with the mistruths that you're battering out here. We would have multiple austerity budgets whether or not there had been a single cent paid to banks. Except you don't appear to accept this. "The Wealthy" already pay the vast bulk of the tax take in this country and they HAVE been hit with multiple things in this budget - PRSI extensions, pension tax changes, higher property tax, etc. Except you don't appear to accept this. Vote for idealistic independents with unrealistic proposals; or commonly no proposals at all other than opposition to everything, if you want. Its one way to ensure we stay in an utter mess. edit: And if you actually cannot afford a tenner a week, you do qualify for a Doctor-Only Medical Card, as that takes in to account housing, transport and childcare costs amongst others in its means test.
MYOB wrote: » Once again, you appear to think that someone on 80k a: isn't already paying far more tax than you, not just a "little more". b: didn't get hit quite significantly in this budget from multiple angles If you want to keep your head in the sand, by all means do, but don't pretend that your alternate reality is actually Ireland. You are the one quoting mass mistruths, so you can stop claiming any lies by anyone else. You are grossly exaggerating the affect of this budget on people (having initially acted as if a tenner a week wasn't much until you realised that is actually the impact on most, for instance) and you also seem to have no comprehension of left- and right-wing.
stephen_n wrote: » Clearly your choosing to ignore my point as it is inconvinient, I didn't say someone on 100k (never mentioned 80k, that was a car price) isn't paying more tax than me! But I can assure you they aren't paying 4 or 5 times more tax than me. Those who earn more can afford to pay more, those who earn less shouldn't have to.
stephen_n wrote: » You keep spouting on about how the rich were hit in this budget but have failed to give any creedence to that argument what so ever, not one fact point or even issue.
stephen_n wrote: » You grossly or maybe just ignorantly underestimate the effect of 10 euro a week on people. Arrogant in the extreme. Do you cling to minimu effect to give yourself some sort of solace? €10 obviously means very little to someone with a disposable income of hundreds a week, but means a huge, huge amount to those, struggling to put food on the table.
stephen_n wrote: » When did I say I was either left or right, my views span both, Labour serve neither, like all political parties in this country they serve themselves. Because I favour social protection I should support and utterly corrupt trade union movement, why? Anyway enjoy the view from your cosy Ivory tower!
MYOB wrote: » Actually did the calculations. Someone on 100k, PAYE, making zero pension contributions and taking pay deducated taxes only, pays ~4 times as much as someone on 41k. If you're struggling to the level you claim you are on 41k, you have serious issues that you can't go blaming on the budgetary process. Or are you going to realise you're making bad assumptions?
stephen_n wrote: » 41k x 4 is 164 or does your alternate reality work on different ratios?
stephen_n wrote: » So I think I'll leave you too it as you'd be better of reading the daily mail, for reassurance of your views than anything I'd post.
Itzy wrote: » Ladies and Gentlemen, while the Budget is a hot topic at the moment and yes you all can discuss the unfortunate implications, I will ask you all to be civil. Please, do it for me...
MYOB wrote: » Someone on 41k pays approx 10k in payroll taxes Someone on 100k pays approx 40k in payroll taxes. This is the point you were trying to make, but with absolutely no comprehension of the figures. I've never read that rag in my life - my views come from knowing the facts. Whereas yours, it appears, come from Liveline.
Meesared wrote: » Sorry but what you're saying makes zero sense, given that someone on 100k pays 40k in tax, you're saying that someone on 25k pays more than 10k tax a year? Sit back and think about that for a moment. Ok, so I'm on around 23k a year, I pay around 2-2.5k tax a year, so yes someone on 100k is paying much more than 10 times tax than me.
stephen_n wrote: » That's the one dimensional view of it, take 1 euro off someone who who has 10 does it make the same difference as taking that 1 euro off someone who has 100? I didn't really make my point very clearly in fairness and allowed myself to get frustrated. I'm trying to make the point of the relative effects and that those who earn more and have more, should pay a higher burden as they can afford too. Society requires those at the lower end to spend, to function and create wealth for those at the top. That can only work if those at the top pay their fair share!
jaffacakesyum wrote: » They ARE paying their fare share though
jaffacakesyum wrote: » I 100% agree with you that high earners should pay more tax than the poor but they're doing that already and have had increases in tax, budget after budget. Why do you still begrudge them? I am just a poor student yet I agree that high earners are paying their way and should not be raped anymore. Why should they pay for the mess of this country? They chose to go to college, get educated, go down their respective career paths. They chose to be doctors, lawyers, businessmen etc. and so take the high wages that come with those challenging and in-demand careers.
Meesared wrote: » The whole PAYE system is based on the fact that if you earn more you pay more tax, that is how it works!
mango salsa wrote: » Are they really? There's a huge amount been thrown around in this thread. Claim and Counter claim have been made but I've seen almost no evidence for any of the claims Here is some evidence that backs up exactly what Stephen is sayinghttp://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/finance/2012/0224/1224312309019.htmlhttp://notesonthefront.typepad.com/politicaleconomy/2012/07/raising-the-floor.htmlhttp://notesonthefront.typepad.com/politicaleconomy/2012/07/bathing-the-rich.htmlhttp://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2012/03/27/2010-survey-of-income-and-living-conditions/ It's nothing to do with begrudgery at all. I actually view it in terms of justice - those who can afford to pay more should pay more - while there is a massive inequality of extreme poverty and extreme wealth then is simply unjust.
stephen_n wrote: » It's not a capitalist country either!