BidillyBo wrote: » Maybe it has found us and decided not to interrupt us and potentially introduce us to more problems. The same kind of way that When we go to remote, primeval tribes in the Forrest and introduce them to our ways of capitalism and everything else it never ends well
Maximus Alexander wrote: » As much as I am emphatically in favour of space exploration, don't you think that's a little alarmist?
Irishcrx wrote: » It's almost too perfect isn't it?
The sun is exactly the right distance away to keep us alive but not ingulf us, the moon pulls and sways our massive oceans ,
our teeth are perfect for what we eat ,
our body hair keeps us warm
BidillyBo wrote: » Maybe it has found us and decided not to interrupt us and potentially introduce us to more problems.
ScumLord wrote: » No, we are running out of resources, that's a fact. Earth can only provide us with so much it's a contained system and our economies dictate we consume more and more each day. That's a fact of the global economies.
Drakares wrote: » In the 1960s, a professor at Cornell named Frank Drake, excited by such whopping numbers, worked out a famous equation designed to calculate the chances of advanced life in the cosmos based on a series of diminishing probabilities.... yet even with the most conservative inputs the number of advanced civilizations just in the Milky Way always works out to be somewhere in the millions. - Copied this from a book I read, found it interesting nonthelesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Drake *Removes tinfoil hat*
Maximus Alexander wrote: » Woah there horsey. If you're going to make bold claims of 'fact', then you're going to need to do a lot of work to back that up. Including:
joydivision wrote: » Might be but I reckon if the big bang happened like they say it did . We are just as evolved as them . So we wont meet them in our lifetime.
FanadMan wrote: » Not necessarily - if a lifeform on another planet didn't "get religion" or greed they would be centuries ahead of where we are.
ScumLord wrote: » I don't think religion is the drawback you think it is. I think religion was part of the realisation that there is a bigger picture. How everything is connected, nature is all interconnected. With only a small part of that picture gods are a good intermediate explanation. The gods helped us realise that there's more to life than our own humble existence.
Irishcrx wrote: » In the grand scheme of things we know nothing.
NIMAN wrote: » We can only comprehend existence on our own primitive levels - who knows for sure if there is something way more advanced to what we know?
Maximus Alexander wrote: » Furthermore, not all stars formed at the same time. What if there was life around Sigma Draconis? Let's imagine they evolved at the exact same rate as us. Well, their star is 130 million years older than ours. How advanced could you get in 130 million years?
FanadMan wrote: » The Roman Inquisition was responsible for blanking out years of work, mainly in medicine.
NIMAN wrote: » Who built the Pyramids?
Defiler Of The Coffin wrote: » Hawking reckons we shouldn't make contact with them lest they try to enslave us
ToddyDoody wrote: » As or More intelligent life you say op.. So they score the same or higher than average on their IQ tests?
NIMAN wrote: » Was there a more advanced race on Earth in recent times that may have up and left? Who built the Pyramids? I watched a documentary on them once and it basically said that we would find it hard to build them now even with our technology, so who built them 4000yrs ago? And if it was humans, and they were so advanced technically to build them, how come their knowledge wasn't passed down but was lost?
Rhys Essien wrote: » Channel 4 now,Alien Investigations.