DoesNotCompute wrote: » Well aware of that, Ghandee. But you could make the same argument for income tax, carbon tax, capital gains tax, capital aquisitions tax, motor tax, VAT, VRT, inheritance tax, universal social charge, pension levies, insurance levies, DIRT, stamp duty, or any other of the litany of taxes payable in Ireland. By your logic, why bother paying any taxes?
donalg1 wrote: » Where did I say nobody has a right to moan I said people will moan whoever is in power and will act surprised when a govt don't fulfil all their election promises. Political parties exist to get elected at the next election and will feed the electorate whatever line they think will get them elected. It was clear fg would not be able to deliver on all their pre election promises at the time of the election as ff gave the power to run the country to the lads in Europe long before it. So why people are surprised now is beyond me, my whole post was about the continuous circle of politicians lying to get elected and people moaning when they don't deliver.
darkhorse wrote: » I know they exist to get elected, and as I said in my post, people were vunerable and they really played on their vunerability. I'm not surprised, and I'm sure a lot of people are not suprised that they lied through their teeth to get into power. You're right of course when you say it was clear that fg would'nt be able to deliver, and kenny absolutely knew that, but he was hoping the electorate would'nt notice what he was up to, (and of course, as I already said in a recent post, ff provided a great distraction), and as we know, the majority of them did'nt. But you would surely agree that, if the same dishonest tactics were used to gain a position in almost any other job in the land, that they would be booted out of that job, and the employer would be perfectly justified. Which leads me to ask the question, are we their employers, and if we are, why do we have to wait for five years before we get rid of them.
Hijpo wrote: » We cant kick them out because the constitution was changed to take away that right.
Ghandee wrote: » A 2 year old and an 8 week old will do that to a man! They dont get the whole Saturday/Sunday /bank holiday thing!
Le_Dieux wrote: » Without wanting to undermine a Mod, to think that someone of this intellect and attitude can post away while someone who never ( as far as I am aware) insulted anyone personally is banned.
dvpower wrote: » It was??? I missed that amendment :eek:
bgrizzley wrote: » sounds good, will give a search in the local offie (if the vintners allow them to stay open:rolleyes:). 5 for E10 in tesco for the other, nice beer and a lot better value than 2 pints of watery slop at the local. Best of luck to her, enjoy the party!!
D_murph wrote: » What I would like to know is where do you expect people to keep coming up with more and more money from to pay whatever new BS taxes this shower bring in?
Hijpo wrote: » Articles 47 and 48
dvpower wrote: » Wtf are you on about. When were these articles amended (and how do those articles at all relate to our rights to kick the Government out)?????????? You're just typing random stuff, aren't you?
Hijpo wrote: » Google the changes from 1922
Ghandee wrote: » This tax, unlike most of the others could be defeated/postponed until it has been thought through thoroughly and fairly. It could directly be linked to the service is supposedly going to fund. It could and should be used to improve the living conditions of many who'll be asked to pay it. It was compared recently to a shop keeper, and him asking for more for his services, I've a problem with this though. If you weren't happy with the shop keeper, or his services you could refuse to desk with him further, you can't do this with this unfair tax. (see Phil Hogans link) Once 100,200 right up to a grand could be acceptable to the people if they weren't asked to pay separate for bins, emergency services, doctor/health, education, tolled roads, vrt blah blah blah. As it looks, its like further wastage to an already over spent country. Stop the wastage, overhaul the system, then come cap in hand and ask the citizens to pay their 'share'. That's my major gripe.
darkhorse wrote: » In other words, the constitution that was drawn up for the people, is actually a tool to be used against the people. That would make us, the taxpayer, the only employer in the country that has no employers rights.
donalg1 wrote: » What he did was a big no no re regging numerous times after being banned then getting banned again and reregging again. Begged to be let back on and was warned any more infractions or bans and the permanent ban would be reinstated so he gets 3 infractions and a ban in 6 weeks. This thread would have been closed if he stayed around which seemed to me to be his aim all along and some on the no side had the same opinion too.
darkhorse wrote: » Have to admit, I did'nt see it. But I will say that he did a great female impression, had me convinced.:o:confused: I better put away this bottle til tomorrow night.:)
K-9 wrote: » Here is a list of the passed and failed Referenda that have taken place in this country, maybe Hijpo can point us to which particular passed Referendum he is on about, because I am at a loss.
Hijpo wrote: » Ill hold your hand tomorrow, the ole phone isnt the best for copy and pasting paragraphs etc
darkhorse wrote: » Thank you for that link, K-9. I'll take a better look at it tomorrow, cause for some reason, the words seem to be dancing on my screen at the moment(cant understand why, mrs darkhorse thinks that the bacardi makes the words dance, I dont believe her). Anyway, I think Hijpo is probably gone for the night, but he is one poster that if he finds that he is wrong about something, he'll say he is wrong.
K-9 wrote: » I'l hold you that promise, barring 2 referenda on boundary constituencies which were defeated, I really don't have a clue what you are on about. Barring European, Abortion and Divorce Referenda , the other ones are pretty minor. If I'm wrong I'll learn from it and move on, not as if it's a first in my 30,000 odd posts.
darkhorse wrote: » I have to tell ya's what I'm listening to at the moment. Are the good times really over for good, by Merle Haggard. Very apt song in the circumstances. Even though its themed on american recession, the words can be changed to suit any country. You'll know what I'm talking about if you hear it.
K-9 wrote: » Don't listen to much music, Dylan, the Stones, Bowie and early 90's Indie stuff. Moving Hearts and Christy as well, too old fashioned for Ireland 6/7 years ago.
darkhorse wrote: » I always detested any kind of country music, but this one I mentioned is just fantastic, I think. Bowie, good taste, one of my all time favourites. Stones, excellent, I was actually looking at a documentary on the Stones thursday night, wicked. You have quite good taste for a young person.:)
K-9 wrote: » You never mentioned Moving Hearts and Christey. Ordinary man was the song in the 80's, looked down on in the 00's. Christey Moore was popular to the mid 90's, died a death after. All of a sudden in demand again. We're just Ordinary Men again, you just thought you where above all that for a few years.
donalg1 wrote: » What he did was a big no no re regging numerous times after being banned then getting banned again and reregging again. Begged to be let back on and was warned any more infractions or bans and the permanent ban would be reinstated so he gets 3 infractions and a ban in 6 weeks.This thread would have been closed if he stayed around which seemed to me to be his aim all along and some on the no side had the same opinion too.
