lugha wrote: » That’s obviously a spoof story. Sure everybody knows that RTE are in the pocket of the government and reported the attendance figures at yesterday’s protest that they were told to. The idea that they would initiate a FOI request to see what their controllers are up to is hardly plausible now, is it? :P
mod: Due to constant trolling and abuse of others gerryo777 will not be joining us again.
(3) thanks from: donalg1, dvpower
Slick50 wrote: » Of course we all know we can depend 100% on the fine investigative journo's in "Prime Time" and "Frontline". RTE stated their sources for yesterdays figures on the six one, and nine o'clock news yesterday, including their figure of 18,000.
Slick50 wrote: » You have been doing a lot calling for "answers" recently, how about you answering this.... why don't we return to the tried and tested, three tier tax system that seen us through and out of the last recession?
lugha wrote: » I was just poking fun at the propensity of the no side to see conspiracies everywhere. It is simply daft to suggest that a government agent would try, or RTE would be receptive to, an instruction to report a particular figure. The risks the government would be taking with such a move stacked up against the close to zero benefit from doing so, would suggest stupidity on a heroic scale for them to even contemplate it.
lugha wrote: » I think higher income tax will come eventually. Perhaps not with a third rate but in some form. And I have never heard it suggested before that it was a higher tax rate alone that saw us emerge from the recession in the 1980s?
lugha wrote: » One obvious “up” is that our deficit is now 13 billion and not 20 billion. And many on the no side fully appreciate this as they insist on using the better figure when if we were to follow there “no austerity” plan it would be the worse one.
Slick50 wrote: » Where was this particular conspiricy suggested?
Slick50 wrote: » Nor I. But you have told us on numerous occasions that no one has suggested an alternative.
lugha wrote: » I mean an alternative that would avoid the need for some combination of taxes and spending cuts. Of course there are choices in terms of what taxes we raise or what cuts we make.
paddy147 wrote: Has Enda Kenny no shame at all???????
darkhorse wrote: » Thanks for putting my mind at ease. I was starting to get anxious when I listened to this guy. He probably has'nt got a clue what he's on about:The Meaning of "Austerity" SHARE! - On TubeWatcher.tv
dxhound2005 wrote: » Not everyone is required to register, only property owners.
dxhound2005 wrote: » I believe in democracy.
lugha wrote: » But us crippling our children and grandchildren with public debt levels is even more immoral would you not say?
dxhound2005 wrote: » He's very good on 9/11 too.
darkhorse wrote: » Persons claiming entitlement to a waiver are required to register their property. If you are going put up a link along with your post, I suggest that you read the contents.
lugha wrote: » I listen to about half of that and got a bit bored. Does he say anything in the second half about how you might fund a deficit if the only people who will lend to you insist that you make an effort to live within your means?
dxhound2005 wrote: » Shouting doesn't make you right when you are wrong. Persons claiming a waiver have to own the property.
tayto lover wrote: » Lugha, There is a huge difference in living within your means and dying within your means. Many people, as we have been told, are using their credit card to pay for food. That's unsustainable already. What do you think will happen after the budget for those poor people many of whom were/are middle income families? Honestly now.
paddy147 wrote: » Cant wait to see the Credit Union report in the new year,after this budget hits everyone in the pocket. I wonder will any of the goverment then sit up and take notice of the reality and facts of how peoples lives are so badly affected??
Ghandee wrote: » See gerry0777 has been site banned completely. Bit harsh IMO. Thread in the prison forum now.
Slick50 wrote: » Release the "Gerry0777" 1. He was far too entertaining to ban!
Ghandee wrote: » See they (FG) have now threatened to throw the dole on to the table for cuts if labour insist on trying to go after high earners. Labour want to raise USC on folk making over €100k per annum, FG though say this is a breach of programme, as both parties had agreed no cuts to dole, and no tax increases during the lifetime of the coalition. I thought 'USC wasn't a tax' though. So what's the problem?
darkhorse wrote: » ps. I have always lived within my means, as I'm sure a lot of people have.
lugha wrote: » I think the real difficulties (as in widespread) have not really begun in earnest yet. Unfortunately, it is going to get an awful lot worse. Have you any practical ideas as to how we might avoid these problems? I’m guessing the answer to my question then is no, he doesn’t tell us who will continue to give us money with no strings attached if we insist on spending more than we raise. (And you personally may live within your means, we as a country do not)
tayto lover wrote: » The Govt are not showing example. They should half the number of T.D.'s and do away with the Seanad. Stop the junkets, cronyism and scrap many of the quangos. Only vouched allowances. Cap wages at the top of the PS at 120 k. Scrap children's allowance for those earning over 70k per family. Refuse to pay the 3.1 billion to the bondholders in March. If we have to pay it, which I don't agree we have to, then it should be spread out over at least 10 years. Pump 6 billion from the Pension Fund into job creation. Make the banks loan to SME's. ( A man in a bureau-de-change told me that he can't get his hands on euro as the banks are hoarding and refusing to hand out). The country needs a lift. People are going around with their heads down in a kind of depression. Nobody is smiling anymore. People are wondering if our Govt are actually representing us as citizens or the Germans and rightly so. What is your solution Lugha?
tayto lover wrote: » The Govt are not showing example….