Sleepy wrote: » It seems to be becoming a far more popular type of wedding than it used to be, lots of people going down the "small wedding / big afters" route these days. Things to consider: where will your guests stay? Are there enough rooms in the house to accommodate people or will they all be expected to find accommodation in the town? Is the "residents bar" end of the wedding something you're willing to forego or will you be paying for all drink to make sure you can serve as late as you like? The guests (except family) will have a bus taking them home. There is also a hotel near by. Will have a few drinks for the people staying over, but otherwise not bothered with the residents bar. How much is this likely to cost you? Marquee and Country House hire are very expensive, you might find the traditional hotel wedding far cheaper to hold. will cost slightly less than a standard wedding, but we're not doing it over the price, we're doing it cause we think we will enjoy it more Finally, it might not be a factor (and is often considered rude to discuss) but most people will give a smaller gift if only going to an afters so you'd need to make sure you can afford the entire cost of the wedding and not leave yourself relying on gifts to pay for some or all of it. When costing the wedding we have factored in to receive zero from our guests, so this isnt an issue. Also, i wouldnt class it as an afters to a wedding, not in the normal sense of the word, and this is something i will drilling into friends etc so they dont feel left out (people, please dont argue about whether this is an afters or not-not getting into it)
lazygal wrote: » I hate to sound like a party pooper but as a guest I'd be a bit confused as to why I wasn't asked to the wedding ceremony but invited to the knees up. In fact, I'd probably feel like it was a token invite. I don't generally go to the afters of weddings anyway, unless its a close enough location and it suits. I know the small wedding/big afters thing is becoming more popular, but I know when we sent invites for the afters for our wedding (mainly to mollify my inlaws who wanted a much larger wedding) most people declined, and they'd have lived pretty close to the venue.
Polycom wrote: » As i just posted, since its immediate family at the wedding (16 people), i don't think my friends will see the issue. I cant see most people being bothered to be honest, they don't have to sit through a ceremony/speeches/big dinner, they get to turn up and have food/drink and a dance. the fact is the "afters" wont actually be that big either, just our friends and aunties/uncles etc we wont be inviting bucket loads of people
lazygal wrote: » I know you know your crowd, I'm just giving you another point of view. In my circle of friends afters invites are generally regarded as second best and people only go if they don't have to travel or stay over. I actually like the ceremony/speeches/big dinner part of a wedding, I feel like I'm really sharing the day with the couple. For me the ceremony is the main part of the day, so when I'm not invited to that part, I feel like I've missed out.
Polycom wrote: » i just think that since no one is invited, no one will feel they are missing out
hoodwinked wrote: » we kept our church/meal tiny, and invited everyone down for the 'afters' we explained it was just going to be immediate family at the church and meal, but we wanted the people we cared about and other relations to come down at a more suitable time in the evening ala a night out. (it was a weekday so people were somewhat grateful they didn't need to take two days off work this way) ditto for my husbands work people, they were all able to go to work that day and the next day (slightly hungover mind) :pac: and when people heard from us everyone was coming in at the same time (other then family) i think people didn't mind as much then!
Polycom wrote: » thanks for the reply, how did it workout overall? where you happy with it? thats a positive of doing it this way, as we were planning a small wedding, most nice venues insisted on a weekday, which means prob 2 days off work for people, and the nice hotels were charging silly money for rooms, so from friends point of view, they dont have to take days off work, dont have to travel far and it wont cost them a bucket load of cash Apart from a few people being put out by not seeing the ceremony, i think its a lot less hassle for everyone involved
HunniBear wrote: » Are you British OP? This sounds like a British event, have the ceremony in a school gym and then head down to the Queen Vic for pork scratchings and some fingerfood
lazygal wrote: » I hate to sound like a party pooper but as a guest I'd be a bit confused as to why I wasn't asked to the wedding ceremony but invited to the knees up. In fact, I'd probably feel like it was a token invite.
lazygal wrote: » In my circle of friends afters invites are generally regarded as second best and people only go if they don't have to travel or stay over.
ABajaninCork wrote: » What's the nationality got to do with it? The OP just wants something different, that's all. I'm English. No wedding I've been to sounds remotely like what you describe..
HunniBear wrote: » I have been invited to 7 English weddings. One took place in a hotel. One took place in a School Gym, and was a bring your own beer event. 4 took place in a registry office, followed by a reception in a wetherspoons (genuinely) One took place in the persons home in a council estate. All the Irish weddings i've attended have been classy affairs.
reprazant wrote: » I find this view really strange. If my friend was getting married and it was a family only wedding, why would I feel put out by only being invited to the 'afters'? I am not family so would not expect to be invited.
evilmonkee wrote: » I think that it is really about knowing your crowd or just doing it your way and toss to anyone else . On a more personal note: IMHO, a wedding is just a party. If you are in a committed relationship and you have built your life together then the wedding day is a party celebrating that (plus some legal bits). You should get to celebrate and party in whatever way you feel most comfortable and will have the most fun in doing. Whether that is a big princess wedding, going paintballing or just having a nice meal.
HunniBear wrote: » Awooga
lazygal wrote: » Not strange at all. For me, the 'wedding' is the ceremony. I like to see the couple get married and exchange vows. If I'm a close friend/family member, I'll be invited to the whole day. If I'm not, I won't be. So if I'm not close enough to the couple to attend the main feature of the day, the vows, I'm not going to be as likely to be as excited to attend what's essentially an after party. If you want a small wedding ceremony/dinner, followed by a large party, by all means have it. But my experience, having planned a wedding and being of an age where we have many weddings each year, is that Irish people regard an invitation to the afters/party only part of a wedding as a second rate or more casual type of invitation and mightn't feel like they need to go.