Email Print London, Nov 21 (ANI): A 37-year-old woman from Sweden allegedly kept skeleton parts in her flat so that she could have sex with them. The woman is suspected of using 100 parts, which included six skulls and one backbone, in "sexual situations" and was charged with violating the peace of the deceased, prosecutors said. Police also found CDs titled 'My Necrophilia' and 'My first experience,' as well as photos in which a woman is seen kissing and hugging the skulls, the Daily Mail reported. The woman, who comes from south-western Sweden, was charged at Gothenburg District Court, but has denied the allegations - claiming she collected the bones out of historical interest. The Goeteborgsposten newspaper alleged that she wrote on an internet forum a few years ago: "My morals set my limits and I'm prepared to take the punishment if something should happen." "It's worth it. I want my man like he is, whether he is dead or alive. He allows me to find sexual happiness on the side," she wrote. Photos from a morgue were found hidden in the woman's home, as well as a drill and body bags. But police have found no proof that she was a grave-digger. The woman, who has admitted that the items were kept in her apartment but denies doing anything wrong, was arrested in September and faces up to two years in jail if found guilty. "Some of the photos show a woman licking a skull," prosecutor Kristina Ehrenborg-Staffas told The Local newspaper in Sweden. "We claim it's her, but she claims it's someone else and she found the pictures on the internet," she said. She sold three skulls and a spine to a person in Uppsala earlier this year, prosecutors said. An access code to a morgue was also said to have been found in her apartment by detectives. (ANI)
flutterflye wrote: » Yeah, it's a bit sick and twisted alright if she did do it, but how is it a chargeable offence? Should people not be able to shove a bone up their hooha if they want? The person is dead - what's it to them?
AeoNGriM wrote: » Violating the peace of the deceased? So Swedish law accounts for the existence of an afterlife, interesting!
I Am Kong! wrote: » Would you want this woman teaching your kids? I think not.
LizT wrote: » What the fcuk was she doing with the skull? :eek:
smash wrote: » fcuking it with a strap on?
LizT wrote: » Well whatever floats your boat... Although it does worry me you can come up with an answer to that...
Lyaiera wrote: » A tangent, but I remember reading a while back that someone's wish was to have their skull used in a performance of Hamlet. And when they died their flesh was removed and the skull was actually used by some big theatre company.
I Am Kong! wrote: » Stop trying to makes jabs at religion (I'm not religious) or this rubbish of 'what harm, what a person does in the privacy of their own home etc'. It's completely sick and twisted and that kind of behaviour shouldn't be tolerated. Yes, she's technically not harming anyone, but a line needs to be drawn somewhere. It's not normal behaviour. Cue 'what's normal and who am I to say what's normal and what's not questions'. Would you want this woman teaching your kids? I think not.
Duggy747 wrote: » I find that skulls make a great soup bowl. Just take the jaw off, put it on backwards and saw the top off. Obviously, scoop out the brain and the surrounding membrane tissue, don't want lumps in your soup now.....
OneArt wrote: » She should've just put the skull on top of the Christmas tree like normal people do.
