indough wrote: » most important for me is that the throwbacks in this movie were just down to it being the anniversary year, and we dont see a gradual slide back to invisible cars, exploding pens and space laser battles like some supposed bond fans seem to want.
Sad Professor wrote: » Agreed. And on this issue the return of Logan worries me. I've never been particularly impressed with him as a writer, and I'm fairly certain all the silly wink-wink, nudge-nudge stuff in Skyfall was his doing. This is why the choice of director is crucial. Nolan and Tarantino will never happen. Tarantino because his vision would never sync up with Eon's, and Nolan because he's too bloody big - and has already made several films that are heavily inspired by Bond.
Sad Professor wrote: » It seems Mendes may be returning after all...http://collider.com/neal-purvis-robert-wade-leaving-bond/212326/ *grumble grumble*
indough wrote: » i think they just wanted to take a break from the quantum plot and do a standalone movie and will probably move back to that story for the next one,
johnny_ultimate wrote: » They should go for broke and just give it to Ben Wheatley
ricero wrote: » I heard rumors that Ernst Blofeld may be making a comeback. id love to see that but would need a strong actor to play the man
FloatingVoter wrote: » Kylie Minogue needs to do a Bond before too long.
mike65 wrote: » No Americans!
Otacon wrote: » Neil Marshall perhaps?