amphkingwest wrote: » and of course, the internet responds:
Attention: cyclists and triathletes! Ever wished you could SPRINT as fast as Cipollini... CLIMB like Pantani... or TIME TRIAL like Lance Armstrong? Then I reckon you’ll be interested in this...
corny wrote: » Lance Armstrong has now totally separated himself from Livestrong
brandon_flowers wrote: » The ****er L.A. is No. 3 on Strava on one of the runs I do, no getting rid of him.
wonderfullife wrote: » would it be going too far to suggest his trolling pic would be similar to Bernie Madoff posing sitting on a pile of cash?!!
happytramp wrote: » Walsh's new book out in time for Christmas. I'm liking the "it'll read like a detective thriller" line from the publishers.http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/david-walsh-to-release-armstrong-book-seven-deadly-sins
DeadMan1 wrote: » I'm sure to buy it, but do you reckon there'll be anything new in it?
uberwolf wrote: » did half hear that one of our esteemed members will be on Newstalk this evening?
2 Wheels Good wrote: » Action Bikes in the UK, book sale, Chasing Lance, Was: £8.99, Now: You choose the price Interesting to see how much people will pay
drogdub wrote: » Good stuff from Cadelhttp://www.velonation.com/News/ID/13306/Evans-comments-on-Armstrong-case-also-speaks-of-frustration-at-suspicion-hanging-over-riders.aspx?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+velonation_pro_cycling+%28Cycling+News+%26+Race+Results+%7C+VeloNation.com%29
petethedrummer wrote: » hmmmmmmmmmmm. is it? any rider who says anything other than "it was patently f**king obvious" is being economical with the truth. And any rider moaning about being under suspiscion after cycling turned some magical corner in 2006 is living in a dream world. If these lads are clean the need to say. 1. Yeah it was obvious to anyone especially us riding against the chap that he was doped to the gills. 2. Fair enough if you think we were still doped to the gills, given that the entire sport was awash with drugs. Anything other than that is mealy mouthed wishy washy doublespeak.
petethedrummer wrote: » hmmmmmmmmmmm. is it? any rider who says anything other than "it was patently f**king obvious" is being economical with the truth. And any rider moaning about being under suspiscion after cycling turned some magical corner in 2006 is living in a dream world. If these lads are clean the need to say.1. Yeah it was obvious to anyone especially us riding against the chap that he was doped to the gills. 2. Fair enough if you think we were still doped to the gills, given that the entire sport was awash with drugs. Anything other than that is mealy mouthed wishy washy doublespeak.