Chucken wrote: » Ah!! Are you back. Welcome!
whatsthetime wrote: » The state will save a fortune in foster care payments and make a fortune selling adoptions
im invisible wrote: » ...dea?
Chucken wrote: » ...sounds like dia, which means vote for Dana and everything she agrees with!! *Subliminal message* from Eurats
EURATS wrote: » God knows what they'll be selling...considering the past.
whatsthetime wrote: » Will they use public funds to advertise it?
IceFjoem wrote: » Boy for sale!
danger mouse wrote: » TBH I dont know what way to vote on this one. I might just spoil my vote.
Smidge wrote: » I wouldn't spoil the vote if I were you. If you feel that you have not been given enough information to cast your vote, keep the status quo, vote no. This referendum has not been fairly explained to the electorate, apart from calling it "The children's referendum" which in itself encourages people to vote "yes" because why could this possibly be a bad thing????
_Gawd_ wrote: » Vote NO. Although given the amount of mentally challenged people that infest this country, it will probably pass. I'm just waiting for the day Fianna Fail is voted back in...that will be the day I laugh my ass off on a plane abroad thinking of the stupidity all the in-breeding has created.
danger mouse wrote: » I might agree with you. Im not happy with pieces of this referendum.
EURATS wrote: » Give more powers to the state to take your child off you?