tayto lover wrote: » Yes I have. Honesty is always the best policy so I will use the old " judge, I have hardly any money left to feed my family. I would love to be able to pay this tax and I could just about manage 1 euro a week".
lugha wrote: » I wonder could all you lads arrange to have your day in court together? I'd say there'd be cracking entertainment!
lugha wrote: » So your policy is to be honest..... So you're going to lie and say it's not the principle it's the money when you have been saying the very opposite all along on this thread? I wonder could all you lads arrange to have your day in court together? I'd say there'd be cracking entertainment!
Ghandee wrote: » Sadly, (for you) this day in court won't happen.
tayto lover wrote: » Yes I have. Honesty is always the best policy so I will use the old " judge, I have hardly any money left to feed my family. I would love to be able to pay this tax and I could just about manage 1 euro a week". Things like this are happening in the District Courts around the country on a daily basis.http://www.galwaynews.ie/26951-debtor-gets-400-years-pay-bill-price-pint-week
dvpower wrote: » .... says Ghandee confidently on the very day of the first HHC court hearing :eek:
dxhound2005 wrote: » Mr Duffy makes himself out to be an innocent abroad who was forced by the banks to borrow €5 million. But as a property developer he was smart enough to transfer everything to his wife to escape his liabilities.http://www.advertiser.ie/galway/article/34245
Ghandee wrote: » How'd those cases go again btw :pac:
Yesterday, the bank's motion to transfer that case to the Commercial Court was struck out
Ghandee wrote: » I predict a new coalition in govt by mid 2013
Ghandee wrote: » …with fines and penalties dismissed with the outgoing govt.
lugha wrote: » It is certainly possible that a coalition government could fall at any time, especially in difficult time, but I get no inkling at all that there is any immediate risk of that. And certainly not because of the HHC or property tax, though that might change. FG are sailing along nicely in the polls. Lab are not doing as well but most of the senior heads in that party are old boys and they know that this will be the last spell most of them will serve in government. I think they would have to be seriously miffed before they would pull the plug. Sadly (for you) I think it is more likely that we will have a FG led government for the next 7-8 years than any other party. Possibly. If the new government disregard the legislative-judicial separation! (What sort of strange hawks are you anticipating will lead the next government? :eek:
tayto lover wrote: » You are right that the Labour's senior heads will not pull the plug but what they are doing is confining their party to the dustbin as they will lose heavily at the next GE. Their lust for power will cause the demise of their party unless the junior members see sense soon and rebel like Shorthall did.
lugha wrote: » I think this was always likely to be the fate of Labour, with or without a property tax. This is a familiar pattern with Labour in the past and indeed with the various smaller parties in the FF led coalitions. But I think they fully understand and accept this as the Greens did. And given the age profile of the senior people in the party they surely feel they have nothing to lose. Don't be surprised if there is a FF-like retirement from politics for a few of them when the next Dail ends. I don't think there is enough influential young guns in the party to change this thinking.
CptMackey wrote: » Labour will go the way of the pds and the greens. As for this charge, I still haven't paid it and don't intend to. No Letter either. If those that paid had a pair of balls then it would be gone now. It's ok tho enda got a pat on the head and a lollipop today off angela. So we will keep going the way we have been. More and more tax and no reform or cuts in the waste that is local government.
lugha wrote: » But if you disagree with Ghandee (and one or two others) on the merits of a property tax then it logically follows that you are a member of FG and / or a government apologist / shill. I mean, what other possible explanation could there be? :pac:
darkhorse wrote: » In all honesty, lugha, what kind of reaction would you expect from posters, other than to think that you are somehow affiliated with at least one of the two coalition parties that are the government, cause there are no other parties in D.E. that agree with a tax on homes.
dvpower wrote: » No shows and adjourned. It doesn't bode well for the defendants. How did the promise of mass protests you predicted go? Did even a single protestor show up at the court?
donalg1 wrote: » That's a good point dv I have been reading here for months about the mass protests that will happen as soon as the first case goes to court. Would be interested to hear how many thousands turned up to protest today.
Ghandee wrote: » How many people here, anti/pro side knew these court 'cases' were taking place today?
dvpower wrote: » Both of those cases resulted in convictions.
dvpower wrote: » The anti charge campaign seemingly didn't even know the court case was on today. It is an absolute shambles.
tayto lover wrote: » You should ring Flathan on Psychics Live.
Slick50 wrote: » That could explain their incompetence then.
donalg1 wrote: » Nah I don't believe in all that crap thanks though. Maybe they could tell you how much property tax you'll be paying next year though if you're into that type of thing.
tayto lover wrote: » I already know -0-