donalg1 wrote: » Sure maybe you should be County Manager or a County Councillor then, that way you can decide what the Council spend thier funds on. Sure they could throw it all at the private estate in which you reside.
donalg1 wrote: » But you arent paying enough for the services you receive at present and that is the point. Councils are broke so they need to raise more money and thats why they have introduced the HHC.
darkhorse wrote: » The most stupidest statement that I ever heard in my life.
lugha wrote: » There are 600k+ of you little scamps, I doubt that there will be a great problem locating a few of them to bring to court. Do you disagree that the DPP going after opposition politicians first , would be perceived as political?
dvpower wrote: » National compliance rate: 63%Mayo compliance rate: almost 3 out of 4 (actually 72%)National functional illiteracy rate: 22.6%
darkhorse wrote: » If you had read the story, you would find that Le_Dieux quote is correct, in so far as he has quoted the newspaper article word for word:-"We havebeen told by Mayo County Council that 63 per cent of households have paid thecharge, but how dothey go about calculating their information if they counted one person fivetimes."Nowhere does it say that the writer is referring to the National compliance rate.
darkhorse wrote: » No matter what is said on this matter or any matter, to you, regarding affordability, you and some others seem to just have a problem believing what you are told on this thread
Le_Dieux wrote: » If it ain't such a problem finding 600,000 scamps, then why are people who are deceased, people who have paid getting the said 'reminders'???
lugha wrote: » Because they do not have a complete register and have to make do with an ad-hoc solution. And we all know why they don’t have a complete register, don’t we?
lugha wrote: » And we all know why they don’t have a complete register, don’t we?
donalg1 wrote: » Really and why pray tell is that then
Le_Dieux wrote: » So where you can deduce it to be 72% is beyond me.
lugha wrote: » I have never disputed that property tax will present real difficulties for some people. But there are many different shades of “can’t afford it” Having to compromise on luxuries is not the same as having to compromise on essentials. There you go again, putting yer mouth in top gear without even reading my post fully. I did not mention property tax in my post.
There you go again, putting yer mouth in top gear without even reading my post fully. I did not mention property tax in my post.
darkhorse wrote: » Oh, I think you can work that one out for yourself, that is, of course, unless you dont actually read your own post and think about it before you post it.
Am Chile wrote: » Now that we re into November-we know the first court cases will be in Mayo-we can expect other court cases in other Constituencies too-when court cases start in your Constituency who on here is getting off their off laptops/pcs and going down joining pickets of support for non payers at the local courthouse ?
Le_Dieux wrote: » And here we have somebody with guts:http://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/italian-government-cutting-number-of-provinces-by-half-as-part-of-costcutting-drive-3279353.html Substitute provinces for constituencies, and Hogan, Your on the road to popularity
donalg1 wrote: » No I am saying that this is the way its always been those working and paying taxes have always subsidised those not working and not paying taxes so why all of a sudden are you annoyed about this. And why is it this particular tax you have decided not to pay as a result of the above and not any of the other taxes or charges you pay? (thats a rhetorical question as I already know the answer to it) The services you receive are not exclusive to your estate you do avail of services once you leave your estate you know? And if you dont think they should inject money into private estates why are you complaining about the weeds in the kerbs and the play area or lack of one and why are you complaining about having to cut the grass yourself? They cant though and thats the point as a result of reduced funding from central government and reduced revenue as a result of the genius' in the Green Party bringing in their carbon based related tax bands, and also as a result of a drop in the collection rates of commercial rates due to the recession.
dvpower wrote: » Most of the regular tax evaders on here have already stated that they don't feel the need to protest - you're on your own (you, RBB, Ming, Wallace et al).
Bullseye1 wrote: » They haven't told us anything, only leaks from differing departments. We have been told it maybe €300 for a 3 Bed Semi, that we maybe paying for the installation of water meters ourselves, why did the planning authority not make it a conditon of planning for the developer to install these? Yet people who agree with the tax seem confident that their investment in the running of their local authority is safe. It is not. Our taxes are still being wasted.
Le_Dieux wrote: » Please tell us why they don't have a complete register, would You?
darkhorse wrote: » I did not mention property tax in my post.