jesus_thats_gre wrote: » You could as having the 1 million up front would be a massive advantage. If you were given 20 grand a year the next 50 years, that would likely be different story - unless you moved to parts of Asia, South America or Africa...
krudler wrote: » could live the exact same as I do now not a bother, think about it if you're on 25-30k a year thats nearly 40 years of living right there. factor in the money you wouldnt be spending commuting to work, lunches, other work related expenses etc, easily done. you wouldnt be splurging it all on crazy expensive sh1t but a perfectly normal month to month existence sure.
GRMA wrote: » do something worthwhile, like...politics
sfwcork wrote: » I dont know If I could.I certainly would have a good few years of enjoyment but I dunno if I would retire
juan.kerr wrote: » Or why not work hard, get qualifications / promotions and take home more money.
wrote:
sink_or_swim wrote: » you simply stick it in a fund and live off the dividends , a million quid will pay you close on 25 k per year on that alone and after twenty years should be worth two million
squod wrote: » Or take up something you might be talented at. Sports, athletics, ball games, whatever. Rather than waste it working away in some poxy office or factory. Aspire.
juan.kerr wrote: » If you live off the interest then the principal amount won't be growing. Plus it depends on how old you currently are. Might be okay for someone in their sixties but maybe not for someone in their thirties (an additional 30 years of inflation while principal isn't growing will have a big impact).
its an even sweeter deal for someone in thier thirties as they have longer for thier equity to grow
bluewolf wrote: » You want secure investments on retirement if it's your only income, not messing with the market
sink_or_swim wrote: » where did i say live off the interest ? , i said live off the dividends , the principal still gains or looses depending on the market over time its an even sweeter deal for someone in thier thirties as they have longer for thier equity to grow , the stockmarket gives a return of about 10% per anum over a thirty year period , historically speaking
sink_or_swim wrote: » which investments are more secure than the market ? , assuming our idea of what constitutes the market is the same
af_thefragile wrote: » I guess I could buy a decent house and a decent car for a million quid. But then I'll need to do something with the rest of the money or else within a decade I don't think I'll have a lot left. Probably look to invest it in a business or something. If I had a billion on the other hand, I wouldn't need to work a single day in my life ever!
juan.kerr wrote: » See bluefaces comment. These 'funds' are a bit more hit and miss that you seem to think. I wonder what the net gains are after fees, CGT and taxes on dividends. Most private pension schemes will move away from riskier investments as the person gets closer to retirement and will ultimately buy an annuity which is also low risk. Tell those who retired in 2002 or 2010 about the '10% per anum over a thirty year period'.