Larianne wrote: » Was this the same guy who was on the Late Late show last year?? Costs a fortune. Felt sorry for the guy, good looking lad but I guess he feels his short stature keeps him back in life?
Would his gait, posture and balance be way off coz his lower limbs wouldn't be in proportion to his upper limbs and trunk??
dearg lady wrote: » That sounds pretty unlikely. 4 inches of new bone is gonna grow?! How long does it take?
Manny Pacquiao wrote: » Your posture is your shoulders and spine - it shouldn't affect his posture, I don't think. They limit how much you can distract your bone to about 12 cm per bone because if you go over that, you'd have weak bones and probably break under your own body-weight.
Canis Lupus wrote: » lulz... all that pain time and money to go from small to slightly less small. I imagine if he's that self concious about himself he'll never be able to wear shorts again because of the lovely scars he'll he left with. But then, it's his time, pain and money I suppose.
Canis Lupus wrote: » According to teh internetz it takes approx 1 month to grow 1 inch... Eurgh... makes my stomach turn to think about twisting some screws to pull apart a broken bone everyday...
Manny Pacquiao wrote: » Apparently the bone-breaking part is the least painful part, the skin being cut and muscles stretching as your legs get longer are the most painful part.
jester77 wrote: » Crazy procedure. I know a lad who got hit by a car when he was a teenager and it badly broke his thigh bone. Once it healed he was left with one leg shorter and he had a procedure similar to this done. It involved getting metal rods put into his bones that protruded out through his skin. These were attached to a frame and every so often he would adjust the screws on the frame to stretch the bone. He was agony a lot of the time and the wounds where the metal rod went into his leg would often seep. You would want to be have serious self-image issues to even consider this.
Manny Pacquiao wrote: » Google "cosmetic leg-lengthening" if you have any more queries because I'm not a specialist.
anhedonia wrote: » its truly mind-boggling, anyone electing for this needs to be heavily medicated.
Rigol wrote: » I don't think you mate has thought this out in an economic way. Are benefits much greater than sacrifices in this case?
Whats he expecting the benefits of this to be? Are they worth painful surgery?
Is he doing this with the intention of getting some more shex or something. Thinking that all women automatically swoon at a guy when he hits 6 foot. Or is it something else? Is it a daily problem for him to be his natural height?
robbie7730 wrote: » The months of recovery afterwards were worse though. Along with the hardship of doing anything, and that was just one leg gone. Still sore at times now. A fair bit of research during the process tells that sometimes fractures dont unite properly. Seems a bit risky unless necessary.
Teyla Emmagan wrote: » Agreed, the healing is the worst part. I have had two operations on the one leg this year (the short one :pac:), the months of physio, crutches, swelling, drugs, infections, pain, physical restriction etc are a million times worse than the actual procedure. And even then you can be left with a bad result. I think you'd be mad to voluntarily do that to yourself.
Manny Pacquiao wrote: » It must be a confidence issue and it's proven that women prefer taller/bigger guys.
Manny Pacquiao wrote: » Most women like to be controlled and protected by men because they're feel inferior, a short and skinny guy can't protect a woman from a rapist or an attacker.
Manny Pacquiao wrote: » More women probably and more intimidating to other men when in fights.
Manny Pacquiao wrote: » Insecurity. Same reason why women get breast implants - they're too small.
Manny Pacquiao wrote: » If surgery makes them feel better, let them do it - unless you want them to be depressed and commit suicide. Surgery > suicide
username123 wrote: » How often does the average guy have to ward off a rapist or an attacker? We're not living in a Steven Seagal movie.
LivelineDipso wrote: » if it goes wrong he won't have a foot to stand on.
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » There are benefits to being taller such as being more attractive to women and getting paid more on average but I don't think it's worth the risks and pain.
Manny Pacquiao wrote: » What reason is that? Your ancestors' diets determine your height. Evolution can be a b!tch.
username123 wrote: » Wow - just wow. I doubt they will go for 4 inches of leg because the rest of his body will look ridiculously out of proportion if his legs are suddenly 4 inches longer than nature intended. Imagine the joint problems down the line from putting yourself out of proportion like that - ouch!!!
Manny Pacquiao wrote: » Nature? Your ancestors' eating and exercise habits determine your height. If a man breaks his leg and permanently bends it out of shape, his genes may pass down to his son and his son will inherit a gammy leg. In essence, you control your children's/grandchildren's body shape before they are even born. Nature would imply it naturally bones without anybodies' control - bullsh!t! It's still man-controlled/man-made. If you want your children to grow taller than whomever they inherited their genes from, then feed them foods and drinks rich in calcium and protein while they're in their growing years (ages: 0 - 21 for boys and 0 -18 for girls) and encourage your children to engage in sports that involve a lot of stretching of the bones and muscles.