Madam_X wrote: » Oh the lazy anti teacher brigade - unable to fathom what teachers are actually responsible for. For all the grief they get/responsibility they have, they deserve good money/holidays. That said, 32k isn't bad. Did they definitely start on 40-odd in 2009?
deccurley wrote: » If ye don't like the pay on offer lads, ye have teaching qualifications, do one.
some random drunk wrote: » I'd love to be on 32,000 a year.
Toby Take a Bow wrote: » I guess when they started their course the pay that was on offer was the higher end.
prettygurrly wrote: » yeah, i was very surprised at the protest. Where is benchmarking when it's the other way round eh? As a science graduate you're lucky to be starting on 19K nowadays or to have a job at all. We're no more or less educated than teachers and go through our own ridiculous working hours/stress/lack of personal time etc. but we are starting on ridiculous low pay in industry. I love teachers, what they do is a vocation but to be expecting to start at 32000 regardless if you're a mature student (who left a job to go back to college, i heard this on the radio today) or a young pup at 21 is insane in this day and age. Everyone has had a pay cut and yes it's unfair to be on less pay than their counterparts but talk to doctors/nurses/everyone else and you'll find the same story. Why do teachers feel that they're different?
vamos! wrote: » Go for a it! You will need a degree (3-4) years, a PGDE (1 year, 6k) and probably an MA to match the qualifications of other candidates. Warning though: 32k is for full time staff (I actually thought it had been cut to 27.5k). I don't know any new graduates on full hours. Be prepared to sub, move all over the country and if you are lucky to get your own hours, you may be expected to live on 8 or 10 hours work- over 5 days of course. Divide 32k or 27.5k by 22 and multiply by 8 or 10 for your wages. Develop a thick skin. You may not need it in order to deal with 29 teenagers,some of whom will have learning and/or behavioural difficulties and little or no extra help but you will need it when Joe public starts to go on about how easy you have it and how you should be lucky to be paid at all. Imagine all those taxpayers paying your wages so you can read a few books between snoozes and lunches!!! Enjoy your short hours and amazing holidays. Don't worry about planning. You can just open the book and read from it. You could give the odd test when you're hungover. Don't worry about correcting said test. Sure nobody cares. If you must insist on doing a bit of marking, make sure to do it during class. The little angels in your care will just read on quietly. If they don't you could belt them with a duster or kick them out of class. Sure that's what our teachers did when we were in school and we all lived. I forgot to mention extra curricular. You may want to odd training session, orgainse a few debates and school trips. You can do all this extra work during class time of course, as you couldn't possibly stay past 3. You will have 32k to spend! Best of luck!
The outlaw wrote: » Also Trainee Accountants would be on that type of salary as well unless you get a job at a multinational maybe 25/26. So a teacher earns at least 28% more than that. Do teachers work 30% more than Accounting/Science Grads? - of course they don't
PC CDROM wrote: » Here is the thing we have all forgotten. Demand and supply. The basics of economics. You'd be safer telling all you colleagues to fuk off into other jobs. Then you will be in demand due to a skills shortage. ching..ching...