Karsini wrote: » Oops, I'm on my way up! Better get off at Newry and turn back.
Iolaire wrote: » Sorry about that. See attached.
Iolaire wrote: » UPDATE The ITG regret to announce that today's diesel gala has been cancelled. An early morning track inspection has revealed water levels to have risen over night and both lines are now impassable. Please accept our most sincere apologies. Issued on behalf of the ITG
Road12 wrote: » R-Worker : i landed at 0845 from london and got a txt the minute i went through the security...shocked that nobody sent a text out to say that it was running a bit even if it was only cab rides in the station...obv they musnt care bout their railway then!
Road12 wrote: » i dont think the itg care about irish cranks anymore really...they wont run anymore tours simply because they cant get on with the rpsi in relation to hiring coaches... Sad really to think what the place has come to...More so -they've got a few engines in some field near Ennis! RIP ITG says I
Railway Worker wrote: » i want to know who made the decision to run trains after all today do the itg own dcdr or was it a dcdr matter or what i am out of pocket here , i can understand if it was all cancelled it was stated on the net it was but someone or persons back tracked and shafted alot of people i want reasons for it and not silly replys ???????????
Road12 wrote: » I think your being very over the top to be fair. These guys put alot of hard work into these sort of things
Cyberbeagle wrote: » At the time of writing both lines were impassable, it did not look possible to run anything. By the afternoon a number of people had turned up who had not seen the notification here or elsewhere, some travelling some considerable distance, and the crews decided to try and do "something" for them, albeit in a very restricted way. Water also subsided and two runs on the railbus could - just about - run safely out to Magnus's Halt (but no further, i.e. not out to Inch), with water still at least an inch over the rails. These were very much decisions made on the ground at the time, and there was no indication at the time the notification went out that this would be possible. We're just glad we were able to do something for those visitors.
Road12 wrote: » Is there any plans to hold another gala in the near future when the flooding wont be there?
Railway Worker wrote: » are you allowed to run trains over rails covered in water ????
Karsini wrote: » Diesel hydraulics, maybe. Diesel electrics, absolutely not, you'd short out the traction motors.
DannyGrey wrote: » What a shame nature got the upper hand of things yesterday , i got the news near Drogheda on my travels up from Wicklow .The thing that really bothered me was some trains did run when it was said the whole thing got cancelled. Would the operations team care to explain things better to us that never got a chance to travel on the trains yesterday , why was there no quick message put on the interent to say that things could go ahead by the afternoon, i know it was done to give the lads that did turn up something to enjoy but theres a lot that of us that took what message was put on the internet that no trains to run and decided to head home again and lost out Very unfair operations
Victor wrote: » Could the leader (president / chairman / head driver / whatever) of each group contact me? Who are these people in the real world? No need to link real world names to on-line personas just yet.
CaptainFreedom wrote: » Can I ask why you want them to contact you?? Not as if this site is an official news source for either group
Victor wrote: » To have 'official' accounts from which groups can post.
CaptainFreedom wrote: » Do you not think their own websites/twitter accounts are enough?
Victor wrote: » It is meant as an extra communication avenue, not a replacement.
It will not be used to engage in general debates or discussions.