bezuaua wrote: » Option A Tevez – Ba Harte – Rafael Option B Tevez – Defoe Harte – Lescott !
the whole year inn wrote: » thoughts on the team,used the wild card,bench is pretty crap.Going to give Carroll a run and if all fails i get defoe in(nice set of games) and maybe try and get rvp back after 3 weeks (next 3 week tough few game ) Overall happy with it,theres enough gamble in it that if it works ill do well.
the whole year inn wrote: » I went with carroll as hes home to southhampton and if hes going to get goals its going to be with them,if hes doesnt work out im dropping him for defoe . Rolling the dice with him and gerrad,gerrard is the same he cant get goals and aginst reading at home worth a shot. Hazzard and RVP have 3 tough enough games so decided to chance my arm.
Ace0x9 wrote: » Views and Opinions?
Shane732 wrote: » Ok, so this is a WC week for me..... What are your opinions on the team below. I'll hopefully gain some cash on Ivanovic, Routledge and Jenkinson before the GW. I'm very top heavy at the moment with both Aguero and RVP - would you drop one of them? Perhaps RVP to Rooney even to free up £1m. I've never really had a £7m defender in before and just put Ivanovic in to capitalise on price rises. I'll more than likely drop him, specially has Chelsea have a tough run of fixtures coming up. What changes would you make?
Ace0x9 wrote: » Peinnar to Walters/Morisson & (Nolan [Has some good fixtures coming up]) Long to Lambert, maybe?
Shane732 wrote: » What about this? The Norwich defender is in because they have an easy run coming up after the next GW. Fulham have a decent run hence the two fulham players.
jossnjuice wrote: » Just played my wildcard.........any different suggestions?? Also, stupid q, but how do you paste an image instead of attaching it!
jossnjuice wrote: » Nope, i only brought in Gervinhio there for the first time. Think he has potential to get serious points as hes playing more as a forward than a mid at the moment!
S.M.B. wrote: » Clark is a doubt now too.
roryc wrote: » Where did you see this.