steddyeddy wrote: » Local-womanizer wrote: » Don't start accusations about ignoring posts. What about the many thousand gardai who avail of free tea, that apply the law equally. It only puts them in that position in the eyes of people who blow things out of proportion. It is a cup of tea. A handful of gardai don't make a whole organisation.... You see my problem with the force is that the handful of gardai are tolerated by the force as a whole.
Local-womanizer wrote: » Don't start accusations about ignoring posts. What about the many thousand gardai who avail of free tea, that apply the law equally. It only puts them in that position in the eyes of people who blow things out of proportion. It is a cup of tea. A handful of gardai don't make a whole organisation....
Local-womanizer wrote: » No they are not. I have a good friend whose father refused to turn a blind eye to the corruption of a few in Donegal at 1 stage. He wasn't the only one in the station to do the same.
Japer wrote: » let everone else - the little people - pay for the perks of the big boys.
Turner wrote: » There is only one person keeping this thread alive. And again and again he is focusing it on Gardai. Despite the fact that evidence has been givben that certain petrol stations offer free Coffee to Gardai, Paramedics, Firemen, anybody in uniform, people who hold fuel cards, drivers on bank holidays... to name a few. Another Garda bashing thread :rolleyes::rolleyes:
Zebra3 wrote: » The clue is in the thread. :rolleyes: And yeah, it's a garda bashing thread. Imagine that! Because some of them taking freebies on the job and abusing their well-paid job. Next there'll be a politican bashing thread about crooked politicans!!! OMG!!!
MagicSean wrote: » Actually you posted one of them. Do you know how to look through your post history? You should be able to find it there. Around post 30 on this thread.
yore wrote: » My point exactly.....for some reason the powers that be in the Gardai have awarded the contract to fill up the cars of their fleet to this expensive company. If there are cheaper options for petrol/diesel then one would have to wonder why, oh why, would the Gardai land the taxpayer with a higher than necessary bill......... :cool:
yore wrote: » Exactly. Although I suspect that you didn't intend to make this point but this is the reason why it should not be done. Someone in the Guards makes the decision to give the substantial fuel-buying business of the Gardai to the company and in return the Guards get free stuff. I'm sure people see the problem with this? Say some other company offers to supply all fuel to the Guards, at the taxpayer expense, of 1.50 a litre whereas Topaz offers it for 1.75 a litre...but they will give free fuel/snacks to any member of the Gardai. If the contract is worth such a lot of money to Topaz that they can afford to give away such freebies then it is obvious that they make a lot profit from the deal. I think that instead, a less profitable deal for them, and more a more economical one for the taxpayer, should be struck
yore wrote: » MagicSean wrote: » Actually you posted one of them. Do you know how to look through your post history? You should be able to find it there. Around post 30 on this thread. I have two posts earlier onin this thread (below say #50) yore wrote: » My point exactly.....for some reason the powers that be in the Gardai have awarded the contract to fill up the cars of their fleet to this expensive company. If there are cheaper options for petrol/diesel then one would have to wonder why, oh why, would the Gardai land the taxpayer with a higher than necessary bill......... :cool: yore wrote: » Exactly. Although I suspect that you didn't intend to make this point but this is the reason why it should not be done. Someone in the Guards makes the decision to give the substantial fuel-buying business of the Gardai to the company and in return the Guards get free stuff. I'm sure people see the problem with this? Say some other company offers to supply all fuel to the Guards, at the taxpayer expense, of 1.50 a litre whereas Topaz offers it for 1.75 a litre...but they will give free fuel/snacks to any member of the Gardai. If the contract is worth such a lot of money to Topaz that they can afford to give away such freebies then it is obvious that they make a lot profit from the deal. I think that instead, a less profitable deal for them, and more a more economical one for the taxpayer, should be struck In neither of them do I state that a local Guard could have the power to decide whether or not Topaz get the contract to supply the fleet. "Templemore logic" at it's best :pac:
hellomynameis wrote: » It's their job to sort out trouble
hellomynameis wrote: » I'm not saying they should be but why stop at a Garda, they don't thank every person who has a thankless job or who helps them out, why ONLY the garda?
MCMLXXV wrote: » I don't have a problem with emergency services getting free coffee but taxi drivers can fcuk off.
MidlandsM wrote: » Jezus Chroist .......it does'nt suprise me that people think its ok for this policeman to accept what is basically a "thinly veiled" bribe...... Don't let a sense of decency, moral standards, the law or plain common sense get in the way of the Boards "anti garda bashing thread" support wagon. All aboard, next stop: "Fingers in the till" apologism.
Turner wrote: » There is only one person keeping this thread alive. And again and again he is focusing it on Gardai. Despite the fact that evidence has been givben that certain petrol stations offer free Coffee to Gardai, Paramedics, Firemen, anybody in uniform, people who hold fuel cards, drivers on bank holidays... to name a few.Another Garda bashing thread :rolleyes::rolleyes:
Ellis Dee wrote: » It is not Garda bashing to point out that publicly accepting freebies is a form of corruption - relatively minor, but so is a teeny-weeny pregnancy - and could undermine public confidence in and respect for the Gardai.:cool: Secondly, the other occupational groups that you mention do not exercise public power in the same was as police; for example, they do not have the power of arrest. I see no problem with a company having a policy of giving its goods and services free of charge or at a discounted rate to all members of certain occupational groups, but then they should have a sign on their premises announcing this.:)
elviscostello wrote: » Are your first and third paragraphs not completely contradicting each other? What would the point of a sign be? What difference does that make?
Poliisihallitus on saanut valmiiksi selvityksensä poliisille tarjottavista etuuksista. Poliisiylijohtaja Mikko Paateron mukaan rajanveto sallitun ja kielletyn edun välillä on hankalaa.The National Police Board has completed a survey of benefits offered to police officers. Police Commissioner Mikko Paatero says that drawing a line between what is allowed and what is forbidden is difficult. – Etuuksia koskevat valinnat tekee viime kädessä jokainen virkamies itse. Poliisihallitus suosittelee kuitenkin etuuksissa pidättyväistä linjaa. Harkinnassa tulee ottaa huomioon edun tavanomaisuus ja edun tarjoajan tavoitteet, Paatero muotoilee. - "Choices concerning benefits are made, in the final analysis, by each officer him- or herself. However, the National Police Board recommends a policy of restraint. How usual the benefit is and the goals of those who offer it must be taken into consideration when making the choice," Paatero says. Paateron mukaan Poliisihallitus ei hyväksy esimerkiksi sitä, että virkapukuinen poliisimies saa 50 prosentin alennuksen ateriasta.Paatero adds that the National Police Board does not accept, e.g. that a uniformed police officer receives a 50% discount on a meal.
Ellis Dee wrote: » No, here is no contradiction, because it is a matter of a benefit being offered to all members of an occupational group, and subject to certain limits and conditions, and, on the other hand, to some individuals for individual motives. The point of a sign would be something that was called гла́сность,meaning openness or transparency. If a company has a certain policy, they should let the public, especially their customers, know of its existence. My own work in the sector of oversight of legality gave me some familiarity with this difficult question in Finland. Here is part of an article on the subject (underlining mine): That is the policy in a country that is often at or close to the hed of the Transparency International table of least-corrupt countries. And that is what we in Ireland should be aiming for. I know it's a huge challenge, but we have to start somewhere. And why not with the custodians of the law by which all of us have to abide?:)
paraletic wrote: » We fill our ambulances at a local garage. I see the petrol station workers very often, and we have become friends with all of them. (In fact, they are almost like colleagues). Some of those people give us a free coffee (and sometimes, out of date buns). There is no conflict of interest, there is no bribes, there is nothing wrong with that. We also spend lots of our own money on sandwiches, newspapers etc. Leave the guards alone, they aren't doing anything wrong... ... what would Ireland be without the begrudging whingers?
MidlandsM wrote: » ...and yes, it's the establishments choice to award food and/or drinks to a member of the Gardai but my question is, should a member of the Gardai accept such like? I was in a very busy Topaz filling station where I always see lots of member of the force having their "break" the other day. There was a long Queue waiting to pay for stuff at the tills, which I was in. I know the girl at one of the tills and I noted a discreet exchange between her and a Garda who just got a coffee and some sort of snack.....she said "you're grand,no charge" ....and he just said "thanks" .......lots of people noted the Freebie, and lots of eye's rolled to heaven.... Personally I think he should insist on paying for it.....it look like a "Stroke" Freebie to me...... what do you think?
elviscostello wrote: » Are the ambulance callouts prioritised on the deliciousness levels of the buns then or what? Ya know, like the guards will let off petrol station workers with the odd murder. Would you be going to issue lemsip to Mary in Topaz when you should be saving lives from the pile up down the road?
davet82 wrote: » I worked in a place where guards got a 30% discount but so did taxi drivers and truck drivers, the idea was to keep them coming back for business, i dont see a problem with it really.
mathepac wrote: » In this case there may be a tax consideration if an occupational group is given such discounts; these may be treated by Revenue as benefit-in-kind for taxation purposes, like the van-driver who takes his commercial vehicle home at night, or Guards using State vehicles to facilitate shift changes or taking them home for meal-breaks.