Daveysil15 wrote: » So she wasn't indpendent. She was still an escort. It was safer for her to do it that way than to work as an independent escort.
shopaholic01 wrote: » Where does it say this? All I can find is that worked for a London escort agency at a rate of £300 p.h.
gctest50 wrote: » That'd be beyond sad (pathetic sad like) @ 3,100 per hour
say_who_now? wrote: » And the kind of people that can afford to pay that are making ten times what she's making an hour themselves, and many attractive women are only too happy to pay for the company of an attractive and intelligent man too*, it's not all beer bellied balding saddos yknow! * >_> <_<Down with that sort of thing
shopaholic01 wrote: » It's ok, we won't judge you!
say_who_now? wrote: » It put me through college, I can't complain!
Daveysil15 wrote: » I know but Ruhama can't seem to, or don't want to differentiate between the 2. There’s probably plenty like her working in Ireland.
ArtSmart wrote: » say_who_now? wrote: » It put me through college, I can't complain! but weren't some of the woman emotionally attached? Wait - you're not female are you? the belle thingy is old hat, a nutter pretending to be 'all growed up'. a sad self loathing individual, who thought meeting even sadder people 'empowered' her. sigh.
shopaholic01 wrote: » A few more of us might be doing it after the next budget .
ArtSmart wrote: » i think i hear a 'dirty dancing' tune in the distance...
say_who_now? wrote: » Nope, lol, I'm a guy, and my motivation was more financial than emotional, while for the women I accompanied, their motivation was just the convenience of not having to waste time on the dating scene.
PizzamanIRL wrote: » Am I the only one that would?
humberklog wrote: » Arse.
shopaholic01 wrote: » An escort is hired to attend formal functions - the escort will need to be well dressed, capable of having an intelligent and informed converstion, have excellent etiquette (there's that word again!) and social graces. Sex may or may not be offered for an additional fee. They will be educated and well spoken, not usually found on a street corner.
humberklog wrote: » say_who_now? wrote: » Nope, lol, I'm a guy, and my motivation was more financial than emotional, while for the women I accompanied, their motivation was just the convenience of not having to waste time on the dating scene. Arse.
As for the belle du jour diaries- well they were just the "fifty shades" of the 90's, my experiences were certainly never anything I'd consider interesting enough to blog or write books about, and the number one rule was always- discretion!
kowloon wrote: » To go off topic a little, does anyone think, like me, that hiring someone and passing them off as a friend/partner or whatever actually reflects worse on the person hiring?
Jimoslimos wrote: » They started from 2003 onwards - "fifty shades of the 90s"?
Glenn_Flinn wrote: » She must be under coercion. Poor angel. Why must men be so evil?
Chucken wrote: » She's also no fool....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belle_de_Jour_(writer) I love the way some people cant differentiate between an escort and a prostitute.
shopaholic01 wrote: » She's high class as in not a skanger, you could bring her to a business function and it would not be obvious that she was a hooker. High class does not mean stunning.