My name is URL wrote: » Are they sure it was a cake and not just a massive pile of coke? =/
Slurryface wrote: » Like I said at the start it waould be interesting to see how the apologists for this crime gang would go about defending their greed, criminality , and excess.
Master of Nothing wrote: » Was the cake made of gold or something? Another fine example of theivery.
Rojomcdojo wrote: » Ehm...you're not supposed to bill your wedding cake to your business.
ehmjay wrote: » Was it insured?
Deleted User wrote: » Yeh for hundreds and thousands
Biggins wrote: » Legally, its a misappropriation of funds UNLESS the purchase of the cake can be show for example as a (PR?) expense which might be seen to be advancing the interests of the business from which it was purchased.
ejmaztec wrote: » See my post No.33:P I don't think that a business can claim an expense on the grounds that it would advance the interests of another unrelated business.
Biggins wrote: » We're thinking upon the same lines. I agree but a good solicitor/account can be very imaginative when it comes to 'creative accounting' of expenses - and sadly lord knows we have had many examples of that in Ireland!
recyclebin wrote: » How can a cake cost €100,000? Did Bertie make it or something?
Deleted User wrote: » Gotta love the Irish.. You think anyone in the UK cares about the coffee the employees of Northern Rock drank during break before it was nationalised? No different apart from the media finding a cake more dramatic and therefore, appealing to the Irish masses.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » They might if the coffe was £5,000 a cup.
RobbingBandit wrote: » They mixed up the billing, the €100,000 cake was due to go to Sean junior in prison. Money for bribes and what not.
ejmaztec wrote: » His cake's got a file in it.