Napper Hawkins wrote: » Says you, after asking literally everyone who has had sex, ever.
LyndaMcL wrote: » Ahava wrote: » In that case you need to know that the heart begins to beat only 3 weeks and 1 day after fertilization - which is the 5th week of pregnancy. This is on average about 1 week after the missed period. Any links to a medical journal, clarifying this? It completely over-rides what I was taught in college and what my GP told me when I questioned her.
Ahava wrote: » In that case you need to know that the heart begins to beat only 3 weeks and 1 day after fertilization - which is the 5th week of pregnancy. This is on average about 1 week after the missed period.
cynder wrote: » I believe the heartbeat can only be heard after 16 weeks.
Sponge25 wrote: » What? Try to make sense please!
cynder wrote: » Angry that they had to travel, do you want home abortions now? Of course they had to travel. They need counseling because they have to travel. I wonder if they need counseling if they ever go abroad on holiday or to work. Most don't openly admit to it do they dont get abuse or hateful comments, or reactions that might hurt them. Getting tonsils out doesn't require counseling. As people have said it's only a bunch of cells, well so are tonsils. Same could be Said for a smear test. Not to many need counseling after a break up. A small few do. Did your friend need in depth counseling? I don't know 1 single person who needed counseling because they broke up with someone. Yes it does happen but again only a small few and the shorter they are going out the easier it is to get over it, 12 weeks is a short time to be going out with someone.
eviltwin wrote: » Is my post not clear enough for you ? As I said in the post everyone's reasons are their own. Those were MY reasons for needing counselling. I resented being forced to go overseas, I was under enough stress without that and I felt scared and alone. I was upset when people I told used it against me. I had to deal with comments about what a bad mother I was and how I didn't deserve anymore children. I know now that those comments said more about them than me but when I was emotionally vulnerable it was easy to believe them. Same goes for the similar posts I would hear on the radio, in the paper, even on boards at times. I actually thought your question was a genuine one, that you wanted to understand why people who choose abortion need counselling. Now I can see you just want to use it to twist for your own agenda. I won't be posting my experiences again.
Sponge25 wrote: » eviltwin wrote: » Is my post not clear enough for you ? As I said in the post everyone's reasons are their own. Those were MY reasons for needing counselling. I resented being forced to go overseas, I was under enough stress without that and I felt scared and alone. I was upset when people I told used it against me. I had to deal with comments about what a bad mother I was and how I didn't deserve anymore children. I know now that those comments said more about them than me but when I was emotionally vulnerable it was easy to believe them. Same goes for the similar posts I would hear on the radio, in the paper, even on boards at times. I actually thought your question was a genuine one, that you wanted to understand why people who choose abortion need counselling. Now I can see you just want to use it to twist for your own agenda. I won't be posting my experiences again. Can a girl have an abortion in Ireland if she's gonna die or has been raped etc? I know there's no abortion clinics but has it ever happened!?
cynder wrote: » A friend of mine had a baby with a heart.defect it was to die soon after birth she was offered an abortion in Ireland, she refused, baby lived less than 18 mins, but they gave her a chance, they saw her, hugged her, kissed her and buried her. She had a name. She was a person.
Sponge25 wrote: » Can a girl have an abortion in Ireland if she's gonna die or has been raped etc? I know there's no abortion clinics but has it ever happened!?
LyndaMcL wrote: » Any links to a medical journal, clarifying this? It completely over-rides what I was taught in college and what my GP told me when I questioned her.
RDM_83 again wrote: » From my understanding of it, if the pregnancy is not viable its not an abortion as such (previous post of mine addressed this issue of definition), as such these procedures do occur when there is a risk to the mothers health. Now there maybe issues 'on the ground' so to speak in Ireland (I know of an example where the procedure could have taken place in Ireland but it was quicker and easier for it to occur in the UK). Personally I don;t get how anyone pro-choice or pro-life could oppose an improvement in Irelands Health service in relation to these issues (referring to the clear cut cases of non-viability).
Sponge25 wrote: » I just don't want in my heart for any babies to die, wether trough abortion or otherwise. (Unless ofcourse it was due to rape, in which case the rapist forced the abortion upon the lady. and/or the baby is very sick and gonna die or the mother is gonna die.) It's abortion wether the baby is viable or not! Not just to me but even if pro-abortion people!
RDM_83 again wrote: » e.g. in an ectopic pregnancy will have to be operated on for the mother to survive, the termination of the fetus is not the goal of the operation, this is different to a situation such as the termination of the fetus in relation to rape/incest where the direct goal is the termination of the fetus (I'm not making a value judgement here btw). Of course it could be argued that all pregnancy/childbirth is a risk to a mothers life/quality of life which is why even though the UK laws appear quite strict 200,000 occur a year in the UK (the UK is interesting because if the letter of the law was applied differently there could be a regime that would not satisfy many pro-choice people as abortion is only an option on the assessment of medical professionals)
Bambi wrote: » are you asking people for scientific proof of something they know in their heart of hearts? this is an abortion debate we'll have no requests for proof here.
Sponge25 wrote: » 200,000 per year? Damn that's alot! I thought it was something like 4000-5000max!
LyndaMcL wrote: » You believe. You don't know. Again, I asked for factual links to back this up, as I only know what I was taught, which is not always foolproof. .
RDM_83 again wrote: » In fairness both myself and Ahava have posted pretty authoritative links since you asked for facts which show early heart activity.
LyndaMcL wrote: » cynder wrote: » I believe the heartbeat can only be heard after 16 weeks. You believe. You don't know. Again, I asked for factual links to back this up, as I only know what I was taught, which is not always foolproof. Read back some of your posts, and call me brainwashed again. If I'm brainwashed, I'm sure as hell not the only one. Oh and as far as brainwashing goes - my family are all adamantly pro-life. I am the only person in my family and my extended family who is pro-choice. I made my own decisions. If I wanted to be brainwashed, I'd still be pro-life as I was as a child.
Chain_reaction wrote: » cynder wrote: » A friend of mine had a baby with a heart.defect it was to die soon after birth she was offered an abortion in Ireland, she refused, baby lived less than 18 mins, but they gave her a chance, they saw her, hugged her, kissed her and buried her. She had a name. She was a person. What is the point of posting this if you don't mind me asking? I've a feeling you're throwing that out there to make women who chose to end pregnancies in those circumstances feel guilty. To add to that are you sure she was offered to end the pregnancy on Irish shores??
Helix wrote: » cynder wrote: » A friend of mine had a baby with a heart.defect it was to die soon after birth she was offered an abortion in Ireland, she refused, baby lived less than 18 mins, but they gave her a chance, they saw her, hugged her, kissed her and buried her. She had a name. She was a person. those 18 minutes can't have been pleasant for the child it's a bit selfish making it live through that no?
cynder wrote: » They didn't want to slice and dice their baby, they had hope, they gave her a chance, she didn't suffer. The doctors were great, she just went to sleep peacefully.
Sponge25 wrote: » Edit: the earliest baby born was 21 weeks and five days and looked remarkably healthy!