TonyStark wrote: » People with cars they are uncomfortable to drive at the speed limit on the motorway should really not be using the motorway. There are plenty roads around the country where there are speed limits are low enough to facilitate their skill level in terms of driving. Ironically, In general I find those in such cars tend tailgate slower moving traffic like buses and lorries themselves and show in my personal experience poor overtaking skills. This is part of where the frustration arises IMHO. I can see the puzzlement on their faces when they go to perform an overtaking manouvre and enter the overtaking lane and then they realise that there is car suddenly right up their arse, flashing lights etc. 9/10 they probably have checked their mirror, but have failed to exercise any judgement in relation to the speed of traffic in that overtaking lane already and have simply arrived into a faster lane. They then gradually accelerate towards the speed limit in the hope that this will carry them clear of whatever they are overtaking and dismiss the car behind as a lunatic of some sort. It's not very considerate on their part to those who are already engaged in an overtaking manouvre already to impede them from it. It borders in my mind of driving without due care and consideration. From my understanding of the rules of the road, faster moving overtaking from traffic behind you always has right of way. In general I find the safest way to overtake a vehicle is to accelerate faster than it and clear it as quickly and safely as possible returning to the driving lane as soon as the opportunity arises. I do this to keep myself safe and those travelling in the overtaking lane behind me safe. At all times throughout the manouvre i feel competant and safe driving at 120kmph and when necessary faster than the speed limit in order to carry myself clear from any potentially fatal threats.
karma_ wrote: » If you're being tail-gated folks, the chances are you are going too slowly. A now non-taught (unfortunately) and mostly forgotten rule of the road is make progress. Please bear this in mind.
karma_ wrote: » I honestly cannot say what the police would make of that one, I'd imagine though they would rather someone not sit indefinitely in the fast lane holding traffic up. That lane is only for overtaking, and should not be used at any other time.
gubbie wrote: » I'd disagree to this part. If I had sped up, the car behind me would have sped up too and sat on my bumper again. All speeding up does is make it worse should I have to brake suddenly. Why should I have to facilitate him? Why can't he facilitate me by allowing me this extra 20 seconds it would take to complete the maneuver before speeding off.
Topper Harley wrote: » It's not so much that you should facilitate them, but rather that if you easily can, why not. It'll make life easier for you too. And it doesn't just apply to those being tailgated but anyone overtaking while there is another car behind. .
Motorist wrote: » "Facilitating" the driver means finishing the overtake prematurely and pulling in behind slower moving traffic you were originally trying to overtake. Often you'll end up pulling in too early, will compromise the braking distance of the car behind you in the travelling lane, can easily get stuck there until all traffic in the overtaking has passed, etc. Only a complete mug would pull in early to allow some gob$hite (usually driving a bog standard Audi or BMW) impatiently following behind to pass.
dirtyghettokid wrote: » going too slow? not true. you could be driving above the speed limit and still be tailgated. you are possibly driving "too slow" in the eyes of the person behind you, who obviously does not care about speed limits.
veryangryman wrote: » The words "possibly" and "obviously" in the same sentence there. Bit too much generalising hypothetical situations tbh
TheChizler wrote: » I think they're just following on from karma's "chances are".
karma_ wrote: » I think it would be better for all involved, who find themselves being occasionally tail-gated to acknowledge the fact that they are more than likely just shít drivers.
karma_ wrote: » I think it would be better for all involved, who find themselves occasionally tail-gating to acknowledge the fact that they are more than likely just shít drivers.
meandmypalimmy wrote: » dont be in the fast lane if the lane beside you is moving quicker than you are. thats my advice
Elfinknight wrote: » But you cant allow for under calibration. If you assume your speedometer is under calibrated and decide that the real 120 KPH is really 130 KPH indication you are knowingly breaking the speed limit. When the sign says 120 or 100 or whatever, that is the indicated speed you should not exceed.
Milk & Honey wrote: » The speed limit is the true speed. The offence is driving at a speed in excess is the limit. Your speed is measured by speed cameras or other devices and not by looking at your dashboard. It is perfectly reasonable and legal to allow for under calibration.
RVP 11 wrote: » That's true. Everytime i see an STi or a Skyline, they are being tailgated by a micra, fiesta, civic etc.
Qualitymark wrote: » I once asked a superb driver how he drove so well. His answer: a) I drive my own car, not any other driver's b) Other people's driving isn't my business c) I treat other drivers the same way I treat any other factor on the road, taking into account their likely actions, but not getting emotional about them d) I always drive 'defensively' - that is, I anticipate conditions and remain calm and focused.
karma_ wrote: » I never tailgate, I will flash lights occasionally on the motorway if some one is hogging the fast lane. Fortunately I possess one of the other long lost skills of the road, the ability to overtake.
Cabaal wrote: » We don't have fast lanes, we have overtaking lanes. What lane are you driving in?
--Kaiser-- wrote: » I'm not sure about B (other peoples driving IS my busniess if I have to take evasive action to avoid a crash) but I definitely subscribe to the second two points