fishy fishy wrote: » this has been on the go for over a year. I think everyone on earth has seen it at this stage.
Ficheall wrote: » I didn't think Michael D came across any better than the other guy, to be honest.
karma_ wrote: » You listened to it yeah? Just to be sure.. the link the OP posted?
starbelgrade wrote: » It's possible to disagree with far-right, blow-hard propaganda trumpeting and still be entertained by the way in which it is presented. Michael Graham may be a right-wing troll, but he knows it.
Chuck Stone wrote: » Some people will have easier access to the 'public' airways than others. If I subscribe to the views of those in power then I will have an easier path to career 'success'. I believe it's called 'manufacturing consent'.
Chuck Stone wrote: » I don't believe he knows he's a troll. Also, people actually buy into his bull****. Look at the Tea Party crowd - without assholes like Glen Beck and Rush Limbaugh (and funding by billionaires) they probably wouldn't exist. I doubt very much that a radio presenter spouting the exact opposite (calling Hamas freedom fighters, Israel baby killers, neocons the dumbest ****ers ever to get control of US foreign policy etc) would have much off a career in the US/west.
Lollers wrote: » Graham is a wound up, nasally annoying idiot. I like to hear both sides. But only if the other side has something intelligent to say. I've never him say anything smart or funny.
MaxSteele wrote: » The amount of youngones and women I know who voted for Michael D for the fact he's "so cute" and looks like Dobby from Harry potter is mind boggling.
Daith wrote: » Small jockey big...
SamHarris wrote: » You know there are very good reasons Chomsky is not read as part of Political Science or Media courses of any realy substance? And its not because of a CT ...
Why do I have a feeling the reaction would be very different if, say, Mitt Romney were to go on a tirade against the Irish healthcare system or our position of neutrality? Particularly from people who cheer this particular bit on.
WumBuster wrote: » Losing the rag, name calling and shouting the other person down down, ya great way to win an argument. Michael D is making a total eejit of himself here, imo.
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » I remember this from the Right Hook. They were broadcasting from a pub in Galway. The leprechaun became riled when he lost his way in the debate, with local voters watching, the pressure came on and it all got too much for the little fella.
Jimmy Garlic wrote: » Does he still "kick ass" when he rubberstamps whatever is put in front of him?... or does he perish the thought of rocking the boat because he is too cosy in the viceregal lodge?. Higgins puts on a good show, but at the end of the day he is still an establishment stooge. No amount of grandiose, self-righteous moralising will change that.
Wompa1 wrote: » What's going on with this? I read this morning that it has gone "viral" in America? Anybody have the source for where it went viral? I'm in America, have not heard it mentioned on the radio or tv and have not seen it trend on YouTube or Twitter over here
Chuck Stone wrote: » Chomsky speaks truth to power - he irritates both the right and left. There is no conspiracy. Also, you need to actually listen to what he has to say rather than swallow right wing tapas sound bites like those pricks Limbaugh and Beck serve.
Chuck Stone wrote: » I have little interest in the millionaires pantomime that is the US presidential election. The Irish health care system is not without fault but at least ultimately everyone is covered regardless of wealth.