homerjay2005 wrote: » lads, by the way, whats the link again that gives a history of all transfers? a liverpool fan laughed at the notion that i said City have spend more in the last 3-4 years, than United have in 25...need to proove him wrong, as usual. but these werent rumours or crap, both these transfers were "done deals" in the opinion of united senior officials, both just fell by the wayside once it came to the s*it or get off the pot stage. sure even fergie said the RVP deal took months to sort.
Paul Tergat wrote: » Not sure if I can raise with a complete masters? Beer ftw
Pro. F wrote: » Was it handed in today? If so I declare you the winner.
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » I actually never knew we bought Peter Beardsley:o Never played though
RikkFlair wrote: » I thought he made 1 or 2 appearances in league cup?
Donnielighto wrote: » I'll see your accounting exam and raise you a thesis handed in today. Bring on the beer and bebe
keane2097 wrote: » lol, I didn't realise United operated such draconian protocols about pictures in training tops.
One would think they'd take a stronger stance on racially ambiguous tweets than on tweets of excitement at joining the club.
Pro. F wrote: » Paul Tergat wrote: » Not sure if I can raise with a complete masters? Beer ftw Was it handed in today? If so I declare you the winner.
Donnielighto wrote: » Draw actually Mon United!!!
Paul Tergat wrote: » RikkFlair wrote: » I thought he made 1 or 2 appearances in league cup? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lzZ5xzVWS0
DM-ICE wrote: » That was a WCW Baywatch crossover episode. Sorry, I spent a lot of my life in the 90s following wrestling and baywatch. Actually why did I say spent, I spend way too much of my life watching wrestling and Baywatch.
Pj! wrote: » See this: These are the pictures Man Utd and their sponsors want in every newspaper. Not this: It's business and there is a lot of money involved. That's the way it is and has been for a long time. You may find Buttner's 'enthusiasm' cute but I doubt the big wigs will share your view. This is another matter entirely of course. Perhaps 'one' may be wrong though.
keane2097 wrote: » The chances of anyone else caring about this as much as you are low.
Posting pics of himself in the jersey before the club reveal him? That won't go down well at all.
billyhead wrote: » Lads, Anyone know of a good site that will be streaming this evenings game. Not in the mood for the pub
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » Pamela Anderson is a red, is a red, is a red
Jame Gumb wrote: » Incredible. Post of the year from NeVeR. To be honest, I'd kill you all just to get a sniff of that swimsuit...
NeVeR wrote: » Nothing wrong with Baywatch Are you reaaaaaaady.
deisedevil wrote: » You gave your opinion of what kind of a player he might be having said beforehand that you had never seen him play which I found very unusual. So understandably I assumed you had only seen a picture of him based on that. Why did you say you had never seen him play and then later say you had?
