CSU wrote: » ...there are ~500 million stars in our galaxy and best guestimates are that there are as many galaxies too - it is highly likely that there are many higher civ's out there edit - yeak your post reads wrong - i fink you missed a comma somewhere im confuzed:(
tolosenc wrote: » Neil de Grasse Tyson once made the observation that we are genetically only 1% different, in terms of DNA when compared to chimps. The most advanced stuff the smartest chimps can do is basic signing, and drawing a few shapes, which is the stuff that we take from out 3 year olds and stick on the fridge and call cute. If that difference of standard is brought about by 1%, it is impossible to imagine how smart an alien civilization would be if it was 30% different. "Oh, isn't that cute? Stick it on the fridge, honey! Little Billy's first String Theory proof attempt... And he's only 2!"
crazy cabbage wrote: » ...snip... Basicly what you are asking is how did our brains develope? They doubled in size in aprox 2 million years. This is 10 times the rate of normal evolution and something unheard of. This is something that no scientist has a clue about. No current theorys stand up to scruttny. We were higher primates and had reached the plattoo of our evolution. Something very unique most of happened to set the scene for the unpresenedated (in any animal anywhere, ever) evolution of the brain. We dont have a clue what happened. We were just in the right place at the right time with the right tools and far enough along the evolutionary ladder (we were higher primates) to harnes whatever change happened. There is some 'strange' ideas that fit the picture but not accepted by the scientific community.
Colmustard wrote: » Liz Bonnin from "Bang goes the theory" good programme that. Chimps are smart they thought me the proper way to peel a banana https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBJV56WUDng
MrFrisp wrote: » Jaesus.. Liz Bonin looks and sounds rough in that video... Must have been early in the morning.. .
Zoria wrote: » Not really, no.
Jesus Shaves wrote: » Whoever finds the other first is the most intelligent
KTRIC wrote: » Possibly bouncing, followed by rolling, followed by rolling of the third type.
CSU wrote: » As far as studying us as beings goes there is nothing they couldn't learn from the TV signals we've been beaming out into space for years...although as soon as they caught a glimpse of TV3 they'd probably piss their intergalactic pant's laughing at those earth thicko's and turn right the fcuk around in the other direction:D
ITS_A_BADGER wrote: » The media seems to be all about the mars rover at the moment and the new pictures from mars are being released to the public. Its freaking amazing that they are pictures from another planet a different world. so it got me thinking what if we did happen to meet another lifeforms on another planet and we were more technology advanced , would we share our technology with them, take them to earth or what would happen???
Wibbs wrote: » Actually we have a pretty good grasp on much of our recent evolution, no odd theories required. The fact of it however is odd.
...have never thought about that nor read any papers, but would it not have been a bit odd for our brain size to gradually grow in a steady curve? That would point to there being no 'Eureka' moment in our evolution ie. discovering how to communicate and use plants/herbs as medicines thus bolstering life expectancy allowing more and more information to be passed down to siblings through language and pictures. At the moment I see no reason why there would not be a spike in the size in any intelligent species brain size...we had to 'go eureka' at some point...
TeddyTedson wrote: » I wonder would female aliens make good lovers..
JohnMarston wrote: » "The chances of anything coming from Mars are a million to one," he said
davet82 wrote: » another line and its copyright
JohnMarston wrote: » What?
davet82 wrote: » woosh! forget about it
Enkidu wrote: » (Also, since you can't travel faster than light, the Earth you left has been gone for thousands of years.)