telekon wrote: » Yeah, I was thinking the same. They changed the men's javelin weight after some drug fuelled German nearly threw it onto the track (think it was somewhere around 98m from memory, not wiki) So adjust the weights of all the equipment and start afresh. Its the only way to make them more interesting for spectators again. Nothing like a good world record. Edit: it was 104m!! :eek:
dxhound2005 wrote: » That won't work for the Women's 100, 200, 400 and 800 metres records, all set in the 1980's.
dxhound2005 wrote: » Pherekydes wrote: » The solution to this is simple. Change the specification for the events. They did it with the Javelin in 1999, and it created a whole new list of performances. The old marks were wiped away. That won't work for the Women's 100, 200, 400 and 800 metres records, all set in the 1980's.
Pherekydes wrote: » The solution to this is simple. Change the specification for the events. They did it with the Javelin in 1999, and it created a whole new list of performances. The old marks were wiped away.
Deank wrote: » http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YPjh_WwWas Unreal
Guy:Incognito wrote: » Was that not cos it looked like Jan zelezney was going to spear someone at the far end of the stadium in the crowd his t throws were getting that long?
telekon wrote: » Ridiculous isn't it? Might as well give that guy the gold for drug doping while they're at it...fabulous cheating by the East Germans once again. :rolleyes:
Deank wrote: » http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WK0zGx9DmLg&feature=related Ouch, god damn You Tube.....
My name is URL wrote: » Anyone see this yet? The ugly side of the Olympics - http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/draconian-wifi-police-stalk-olympic-games-20120803-23jdc.html Apparently, since BT are the "official communications services provider" for the games. Only access points which they operate are allowed for the duration.
blueser wrote: » Hardly surprising if BT have shelled out megabcucks for the right to be the exclusive wifi provider. If I was them, and someone else was providing competition without the initial outlay that I had, I'd be mightily p****d off.
blueser wrote: » My name is URL wrote: » Anyone see this yet? The ugly side of the Olympics - http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/draconian-wifi-police-stalk-olympic-games-20120803-23jdc.html Apparently, since BT are the "official communications services provider" for the games. Only access points which they operate are allowed for the duration. Hardly surprising if BT have shelled out megabcucks for the right to be the exclusive wifi provider. If I was them, and someone else was providing competition without the initial outlay that I had, I'd be mightily p****d off.
Tox56 wrote: » But how do you do that? You can't just 'develop' the likes of Wiggins, Cavendish and Hoy, especially in a country the size of Ireland.
keith16 wrote: » Nice piece of trivia... Which country has won the most medals, but never hosted the Olympics?
Jimoslimos wrote: » Technically 'Russia' has never held an Olympic games
Pherekydes wrote: » Jimoslimos wrote: » Technically 'Russia' has never held an Olympic games I think Moscow is in Russia.
Pherekydes wrote: » I think Moscow is in Russia.
Jimoslimos wrote: » Yeah yeah, I know host city not country but Moscow was part of the USSR in 1980
blueser wrote: » I think Gary might have got a bit carried away with that comment. Understandable after the day/evening Great Britain has had.
robinph wrote: » This list gives a few potential answers depending on the question:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-time_Olympic_Games_medal_table Hungary if you are just counting summer games, or East Germany or Hungary if counting summer and winter and then depending on how you count the Germany's.
Pherekydes wrote: » Moscow has always been in Russia. Russia was in existence before the Soviet Union.