foxyboxer wrote: » From the Muirfied site.Dress in the Smoking and Dining Rooms after 10.00am is smart, equivalent to a gentleman's lounge jacket and tie. So essentially, I would be escorted from the premises for the crime of not wearing a tie? We're there to hit a small white ball around a field, not hob nob with a brandy and a bunch of pretentious gits.
GreeBo wrote: » So why would you want to go in there so?
ssbob wrote: » Dress codes are good for golf etiquette though, the majority of the time the guy who doesn't take care when dressing is not going to repair divots and not going to repair pitch marks, however in saying that some clubs are over the top. I really can't understand for the life of me why how anyone can play golf in jeans, I am seeing it more and more nowadays!
foxyboxer wrote: » I wouldn't. But if you were in a situation where you were at the club (not playing golf) and happened to enter the dining room, were asked to leave, you queried as to why, and were informed you didn't have a tie. You'd have to see how ridiculous it is.
GreeBo wrote: » Tbh no I wouldnt. Why would you be at the club, not playing golf, and not be aware of the dress codes? I think you are just trying to poke fun at somewhere because they have rules that you dont agree with. I had to wear a uniform in school that involved a tie. I'd be punished for not wearing that tie as that was the dress code. I dont see why you think its ridiculous at all. If you want to be there obey their rules, if not be somewhere else where the rules suit you.
foxyboxer wrote: » The theory goes in Bars that the dress code (shoes, no trainers) is in place as those with runners would be more likely to start a fight. Makes sense in a way. So perhaps that's the reasoning for the etiquette theory.
foxyboxer wrote: » Common Sense should prevail not pedantry. e.g. Golfers must wear smart casual clothing. *with a guideline provided* Soft Spikes. No Golf Shoes in the Club House. Smart Casual attire in the dining room. Not Navy ties with a red stripe in a Windsot knot and a dining jacket with three brass buttons must be worn when ordering in the dining room etc. "Good Morning Sir, could you please leave without a fuss...right now?" "It's the Half Winsdor isn't it" "Precisely, sir" "Almost!"
I think you are just trying to poke fun at somewhere because they have rules that you dont agree with.
foxyboxer wrote: » Prohibiting someone from eating their lunch or dinner at a club because they are not wearing a tie (although they could be decked out in Saville Row's finest regardless) is pedantic and deserves to be made fun of. It's the sort of practice that reinforces the stereotype of Golf being a game for snobs. Which it isn't. I agree with common sense rules as others have outlined already.
GreeBo wrote: » Like I said earlier :cool: Following the rules that the majority of members of a club you are in is not being pedantic. Having rules that some people can ignore some of the time is a disaster as you will always get someone who pushes and pushes. Either have rules and obey them all or dont have them, having them but picking and choosing which ones are ok and which are pedantic is rather silly.
GreeBo wrote: » Ok so is it just ties that are a problem?
foxyboxer wrote: » Imagine the following scenario. The club has the following policy; Men’s shirts must have collars and long or short sleeves, and must be tucked inside the trousers at all times. Football / rugby style polo shirts are not considered golf dress. You are the club secretary and someone shows up like this. Do you let them play or insist they change to a collared shirt or leave the course? Being pedantic, you would have to insist they change but common sense would invoke a little flexibility and allow them to play but remind them of the collared shirt code for future reference.
link_2007 wrote: » I have no problem adhering to rules Greebo but I think the point foxyboxer is making is that some places appear to have these rules just for the sake of having them. I mean if my workplace tell me from now on I have to wear my suit jacket as a pair of makeshift trousers than am I being pedantic for not wanting to go along with it? If I happen to disagree that I should need to wear a tie and suit jacket (I know this is the extreme) in order to have a cup of coffee after a round of golf, I dont think it's unreasonable to question why.
TheDoc wrote: » Personally have no time for that sort of snobbery. Proper attire on the course, casual wear in the clubhouse.
Almaviva wrote: » Of course, any club is free to decide how they are going to dress if they wish, and impose that on visitors if they wish.But, I am totally against any dress code whatsoever, and would prefer to be a member of a club that did not have one. It all stems from the old class system where your clothes signalled your position in the social structure. And has hung on in the, generally, conservative and upper social milieu of golf clubs (yes I know everyone plays golf these days, but, customs, particularly ones displaying elitism or superiority are slow to change) . Those hanging on to the more 'relaxed' code of for example no football shirts, or no jeans, are only kidding themselves. The syndrome is the same as the blazer and tie stipulation for the dining room. Just with the line drawn in a different place. Golf is a social and lesiure activity, and I find it odd that someone should feel he can object to having to see me on the course wearing a collarless tee shirt and cut-off jeans. Having said all that, I only wear trousers made by my Saville Row tailor in Egyptian cotton sateen, my shirts are a polo style, in a silk/cotton blend of my own specification (all in Titian blue) and made in Paris (the only city in the world one can get polo shirts made with any distinction), and my shoes are hand made in Milan to lasts which they hold for me and update every two years to ensure a perfect fit. But thats just my own preference and I dont believe anyone should be able to object to me dressing as I choose.