Jimmy Iovine wrote: » carlcon wrote: » Looking at their squad, I think he might. Personally, I won't start with him, but he'll be top of my shortlist for sure. If Sunderland are quiet until the window closes, he should be just as much a threat this season. Yea I had a look myself and he'll surely be up top. And with Larsson and McClean on the wings supplying him with crosses he'll be fine.
carlcon wrote: » Looking at their squad, I think he might. Personally, I won't start with him, but he'll be top of my shortlist for sure. If Sunderland are quiet until the window closes, he should be just as much a threat this season.
Sugar Free wrote: » Hopefully this screengrab works. Anyway here's my team, all critique welcome. Will normally go with Krul as first choice keeper. Kind of feeling like my subs are lacking, any suggestions on a compromise between better subs/cheaper defence?
Lemlin wrote: » I still have worries about him getting his place. SAF may decide to bring him in on a softly, softly approach. The Independent reckon that United were playing Shenhue Shenghai's (or however you spell it) second team.He cost 14 million so he'd want to be running the show against them to be honest. I'll wait and see how he fares against a tough Everton team on the first day of the season.
manual_man wrote: » I'll be waiting on Kagawa. Another thing to consider, is the marketing side of things. It's obvious he's a big pull in China, so it's no surprise he started in that friendly. doesn't necessarily mean he'll start against Everton. I'll wait, the last thing you want is to be suckered by a fergie mind game punch on day 1 :pac:
carlcon wrote: » Just toying around in my spare time, trying to figure out where I want to spend money. This has way too much invested in the back 7, but with 2.5m to spare, this would be a pretty decent team to start with, IMO. I guess the point I'm highlighting here is that there's plenty of value this season.
keano_afc wrote: » Looking at teams on this thread and others I see a distinct lack of David Silva. Am I in the minority in picking him?
shadowcomplex wrote: » Thats not for a top class player these days, I mean look at Henderson and Carrolls price tags
Lemlin wrote: » Can you post in text for those of us without images? Just a note for some people, you may get more replies to your teams if you post them in text or even text and a screen grab. I'm in work and computer doesn't load images. I'm sure some others are in the same predicament.
MikeCork2009 wrote: » Here's my first draft for 2012/13 (Text Only Version) I think like a few others have said, I'm not 100% happy with my subs and think I could get caught out by injuries. Any comments/suggestions are much appreciated. de Gea Shawcross - Simpson - Fabio - Cole, A Pienaar - Kagawa - Hazard Ba - Rooney (V) - Aguero (C) Subs: Jaaskelainen Frei Cork Barnett
Jimmy Iovine wrote: » From your starting line up I'd be a little concerned about Pienaar and Ba. They both need to move to increase their chances of being a good quality FF player, Pienaar especially.
BKC wrote: » A few people here, including myself, have Pienaar in their FF team and that is because we are all banking on him moving back to Everton where he will play regularly and perform better. I don't think anyone here will be keeping him if he stays with Tottenham.
RB100 wrote: » 3rd draft. help me! opinions people?
Skippy44 wrote: » looks fairly good to me; you have no city player in your front 8 tho, may let you down on that front. Maybe Aguero for Rooney would correct that.
Skippy44 wrote: » First go at posting a pic, yay! Not happy with keepers and maybe one top midf too many but loath to change any of the three. Any thoughts welcomed...
Jimmy Iovine wrote: » I'm aware of that and he could be a great player to have now that Cahill is gone from the scene. I read today that QPR and Sunderland are trying to get in on the act as well. What with Everton and Spurs not agreeing a fee and the player and club not agreeing personal terms I think this may drag on a bit. If it's done in the next week or two then he's a good option. If it isn't then I'd be a little wary.
AdamD wrote: » Walcott isn't guarenteed to start every game tbh, with Chamberlain/Gervinho/Podolski and potentially Cazorla all competing for the 2 winger slots, 9m might be a bit expensive for him.
AdamD wrote: » Latest draft Thoughts? I don't like having 2 Swansea midfielders so am looking for a way to change that.
FatRat wrote: » Neither of them are worth it either. Britton didn't score or assist anything last year despite playing nearly every game. Dyer isn't worth the 5.5. He is way too incosistent and would only do as a benchwarmer. But he's too expensive at 5.5 for a benchwarmer. Take out Britton and Dyer and you have 10 million. You could get Maloney and Noble with that 10, two popular options at the moment. They are worthy options too.
SpaceCowb0y wrote: » Ok so heres what i've come up with so far! Im sure i will still make a few changes between now and the start of the season but besides some of my cheaper options and maybe Arteta im happy enough! Any opinions???