token56 wrote: » Just a personal thing but I wouldn't feel comfortable starting Silva this season, seem to be off the pace a bit at the euros and I think he might need a bit more time before he will be back flying in the premier league. .
BKC wrote: » I'd take the opposite view. City and United will more than likely keep the most clean sheets so it makes sense to pack your back 7 with their players. I tend to have my cheapest players in midfield in general bar maybe one big player because I think defenders/keepers/strikers are bigger point earners.
RB100 wrote: » https://us.v-cdn.net/6034073/uploads/attachments/478769/213985.JPG good? bad? put it together last night money in the bank to do Torres-->Rooney
ScienceNerd wrote: » First proper draft, any opinions appreciated.
hupskip wrote: » it makes no sense having two defenders from City and a goalie/defender from United.
shadowcomplex wrote: » Ok heres mine, I realise there are question marks over Harte with Shorey being signed so ill be looking out for readings pre season games to see if Harte starts, im also banking on Pienaar going back to Everton and ill be keeping an eye out for michu and his price So what ye guys think
carlcon wrote: » Definitely need a better bench, IMO. It's one thing having a 3rd sub as dead wood (Ferguson last season), but to have 3 pretty-much-useless subs is too much. Especially with the likes of City, United, and Chelsea players subject to possible rotation. I'd also try find a better sub keeper. The key this season will be in finding a cheap starting home/away combo like Vorm/Krul last season. The only time I'd stick a dead-wood keeper on my bench is if I was investing big money into a top keeper to play every game. I'm looking at Begovic myself. Will have to wait though to see if he's in the first team as a regular.
Paully D wrote: » Pretty ****e bench but that's usually the case for me in this game and I've done well the last few seasons.
hupskip wrote: » I would get rid of Evra and Lescott for sure and replace them with cheaper defenders - this will enable you to strengthen your midfield and alos it makes no sense having two defenders from City and a goalie/defender from United.
LostBoy101 wrote: » I doubt Evra will get you much points and he is in danger of being replaced or dropped.
PowerData wrote: » Hmm, sure, let's try that. My midfielders and subs suffered, but what do you guys think (again)? :P
manual_man wrote: » Usually more money spent on attacking players is the way to go.. Get a Rooney or Aguero in there!
FutureGuy wrote: » Kagawa is almost certainly going to play in the hole at Man United, right behind Rooney. Nani and Valencia are not in competition for his place, and his main threats are Wellbeck, Hernandez and possibly Young. I think Kagawa is currently the least likely to be rotated out of all the players mentiond above. He is also 0.5m cheaper than Nani and Valencia. Preseason will tell us more but Kagawa fills a very specific role at United, one I feel he will excel at, with Nani, Valencia and Rooney bot helping him and being helped by him. It seems that he is nailed on to start given Sagnas injury. However, Arsenal have Sunderland (H), Stoke (A), Liverpool (A) Southampton (H) and Man City (A) in their first five games. He's not as nailed on in my starting squad as you might think but he is certainly in contention given his 4.5 m price tag. Once we know how long Sagna will be out, we will get a better idea, but Jenkinson certainly looked capable when given his opportunity last season.
Munster Magic wrote: » Will be keeping an eye on Harte alright. Not sure about Begovic either as Sorensen may start but we will have to wait and see I suppose. Frei could be a great bargain if he gets games so hopefully he willWill Hazard start for Chelsea?
PowerData wrote: » My first try.. What do you guys think of it?
BKC wrote: » Yes, I would say he is a certain starter. Could be a good player for assists and a few goals. Scored in their first preseason friendly two days ago.
Munster Magic wrote: » Will Hazard start for Chelsea?