flutterflye wrote: » I have a cat - she's more free than I am. She's a manipulative little fecker - she owns me more than I own her.
christmas2012 wrote: » Its better to have a trained dog than an unruly four legged creature with teeth,that is restless.. If it gets walks and the freedom to run a bit of green everyday,watered and fed,as far as the dog is concerned they know no better and would consider it a good life as opposed to being locked up in a cage(smelling its own toilet with hardly any room to swing a tail) on death row in some dog pound..
Dogs should be released back into their natural habitat... where ever that is... the park maybe
Father Damo wrote: » Does he feed the dog meat sourced tins and meal out of curiousity? Cant really understand if he refuses to eat slaughtered farm animals but feeds the same to the dog tbh.
christmas2012 wrote: » thats a bad idea esp if they are untrained,dogs need some sort of structure either in the dog pack form or human companionship..
GarIT wrote: » I don't think its fair to lock something up for 23 hours a day. I doubt most people would like it if they were locked in your sitting room except for at most an hour a day.
GarIT wrote: » I don't think so, natural selection will sort it all out. How do you know dogs need human companionship? Dogs could hate humans but put up with them for fear of being put down.
Shryke wrote: » Dogs have evolved alongside humans for thousands of years. They are domesticated animals and function as part of a human family or as a companion. A wolf would be another story. Good luck keeping one of those. Keeping a bird with clipped wings or the like is fairly sad.
DonkeyStyle \o/ wrote: » Dogs should be released back into their natural habitat... where ever that is... the park maybe.
xxxJennyxxx wrote: » I work in a pet shop, the amount of pure shíte people feed their animals while claiming they 'love' them. 9 times out of 10 when I suggest a good, high quality food I get a "Oh I don't want to spend that on my dog" and continue to feed the dog crap. pet peeve, if you loved your dog/animal like you claimed, you would be willing to go the extra mile to feed them properly.
LordSmeg wrote: » Then again working in a place that keeps countless animals locked in confined spaces ready to sell to anyone with a few quid knowing a lot of them will probably die of neglect I'm not sure you have the moral high ground on that. No offence.
They dont know they are going to be put down though they cant comprehend human voices when we are talking and chattering,they can pick up on cues though,what they would think if you were getting ready to put them in the car etc,is that youre going to take them to the pound,they wont know about the putting down bit until its too late..
christmas2012 wrote: » True i see your point,we have a couple of dog owners on this road where i am,and some of the owners are employed some are unemployed and one is self employed. The self employed fella brings the dog everywhere in the car-trailer with him,the unemployed lad brings the dog on walks at least 3 times a day and plays ball with him on the green. The employed fella doesnt see his dog much but manages to bring him for a one time walk everyday,spends the most time with the dog on weekends,but we do hear him barking a bit out of frustration of seeing nobody and having no stimulation so it does suck a little for the dog.. I think if youre to get a dog while working,a dog sitter would be worth getting maybe for 2 hours a day to bring him/her for a walk for the 2 hours,it would kind of break up the day a little..