Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » Put an attractive woman in a random street and have her ask ten men at random for a spare euro, then get a twenty stone woman to do the same. Are you saying they have an equal chance of getting the euro?
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » What's not about power? The simple fact of matters are that the more attractive a woman is the more influence she has over men. Do you deny this statement?
midlandsmissus wrote: » Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » What's not about power? The simple fact of matters are that the more attractive a woman is the more influence she has over men. Do you deny this statement? What if the man had got to know said attractive woman and couldn't stand her?
Onixx wrote: » Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » Put an attractive woman in a random street and have her ask ten men at random for a spare euro, then get a twenty stone woman to do the same. Are you saying they have an equal chance of getting the euro? Bit of an extreme to use as an argument no?
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » If by extreme you mean accurate and unbiased then yes.
Logical Fallacy wrote: » But that can be applied to lots of stuff. .
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » Did I ever say looks are the only thing that matters to men looking for a girlfriend. What is power? It's the ability to influence other people. Attractive women all things equal can influence men more than unatteactive women. Try an experiment, dress attractively and ask for favours from men and then ask for favours dressed unattractively.
AdventRises wrote: » In regards to sex ... Yes. 'guys are the chasers, girls are the choosers" - reason why its a famous saying
AdventRises wrote: » not really. Scanlas The 2nd point and your point are different.
Onixx wrote: » Jaysus some folks here are mad for the simplistic labelling - no breaking things down for you guys!
Sauve wrote: » Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » If by extreme you mean accurate and unbiased then yes. Do you honestly think that all men are that shallow and stupid?
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » I'm non judgemental about it. It's far from shallowness or stupidity, its deeply primordial instincts. Pick 100 20, 25, 30, 35 year old women at random and get them to try the experiment. Then do the same experiment with women who rate from 1 to 10 on attractives ( already determined by surveys) and perform the same experiment. I think somehow you might see a pattern in the results.
AdventRises wrote: » I hate that word 'labelling' It gets thrown around too much. Especially in defense of things.
Lyaiera wrote: » Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » Did I ever say looks are the only thing that matters to men looking for a girlfriend. What is power? It's the ability to influence other people. Attractive women all things equal can influence men more than unatteactive women. Try an experiment, dress attractively and ask for favours from men and then ask for favours dressed unattractively. You don't seem to get this and instead have thundered down the road Machiavelli paved so many years ago. Lots of people simply aren't playing the game you think you're playing. We're fortunate enough that for most people the basics in life are provided for. We don't have to get into silly willy waggling contests about who has more stuff or more influence or more power. We get on with life because you know what? Life is fcuking enjoyable without putting bullsh1t braggadocio over all our interactions. I'm not trying to extract anything from you, or influence you for anything, I'm simply trying to understand what makes you tick, and what will make me and you happy. There's no tricks or cons or powerplays to this, it's basic humanity and honesty between two people who simply couldn't give a feck about should and shouldn't and can be happy with what they have and what they can get with each other.
Fizzlesque wrote: » Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » Put an attractive woman in a random street and have her ask ten men at random for a spare euro, then get a twenty stone woman to do the same. Are you saying they have an equal chance of getting the euro? You have a point with this example, but it works both ways. Get an attractive man, put him on a random street looking lost and confused and approaching women for assistance, and then put a sweaty, bug-eyed man in dirty, ill-fitting clothes doing the same thing, and see what happens.
catthinkin wrote: » Equally there are really average men who have bags of charm who pull the most amazing looking woman . Looks maybe attract at the beginning but the personality wins out in the end irrespective of age ! Imo
Sauve wrote: » Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » I'm non judgemental about it. It's far from shallowness or stupidity, its deeply primordial instincts. Pick 100 20, 25, 30, 35 year old women at random and get them to try the experiment. Then do the same experiment with women who rate from 1 to 10 on attractives ( already determined by surveys) and perform the same experiment. I think somehow you might see a pattern in the results. I can see where you're coming from but I still disagree- plenty of men can and will over-ride that initial primordial reaction and make their decision based on more factors than instinct.
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » So much of what we think we make decisions on is an illusion. In many cases are emotions and instincts dictate our choice then after the fact we imagine reasons why we made the choice to fit in with our self image. But of course men still make decisions on other factors.
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » The above is ridiculously misinterpreted. People have varying amounts of influence over other people. Are you under the assumption everyone can influence exactly the same as everyone else. Influencing skills is part of normal social skills. Who said anything about bravado. I never said you are trying to extract anything from anyone. You're jumping to crazy assumptions.