LordSmeg wrote: » Did you ask for a manager or supervisor ?
admiralofthefleet wrote: » no. i left cause i literally just wanted to get out of there
stupidusername wrote: » Oh dear. I wrote in R&R earlier today about an experience I had with a lady needing to change her baby's nappy. We were in a restaurant, just about to eat our meals, when this woman put her baby on her lap and started changing it's nappy. I was like :eek: She did it in full view of everyone, didn't make any attempt to cover up. there were two toilets, as to why she couldn't do that in one of them I don't know. She was complaining about there being no baby changing facilities, when a) she'd brought stuff in from McDonalds up the road, b) if she could change it on her lap she could've done it in the toilet and c) she left right after doing that so surely it could've waited. I was thinking to myself why didn't she go back to the McDonalds they'd obviously been to and use the facilities there, but then maybe they hadn't got changing facilities there.
teishen wrote: » ...sure none of the women would have minded seeing you've a baby to change..
stupidusername wrote: » am, what?
admiralofthefleet wrote: » So i was in mc donalds today having a burger and had 7 month old son with me. eventually he needed to be changed so off i went to the baby changing in the toilets the next part enraged me. there was no baby changing in the gents and no disabled toilet, the baby changing area is only in the ladies. i asked a member of staff where was i able to change the baby and she said 'only in the ladies but obviously you cant go in there'. i couldnt believe it, the baby was starting to get cranky but she stood at the door of the ladies blocking it so there was no way i could go in. im very angry over this, i feel its sexist that baby changing is only available in the ladies toilets. i ended up changing him in the car but could have prevented him crying for half an hour if baby changing was available to men. it was the donaghmede branch of mc donalds. im seriously thinking of ringing joe tomorrow over this and going furtherthoughts?
Mr.Biscuits wrote: » Nah, she'll just kick you in the balls and scream: "That bastards kidnapped a child!!"
Pushtrak wrote: » Simple. Don't eat in McDonalds. This incident isn't the only reason to justify such a move.
Battered Mars Bar wrote: » Wtf Could you not just lob him up on the sink counter in the mens jacks?
PinkFly wrote: » First world problem don't ya just love 'em
PinkFly wrote: » Or in the cubicle on your knee??
Andy Carroll wrote: » Are you lot taking the fucking piss? What an age we live in.
teishen wrote: » If you walk into the ladies toilet as a man, with a baby in your arms to change, no woman will give you any grief.
Pushtrak wrote: » Suppose you go somewhere and aren't happy with the service for whatever reason. Do you suppose it is a good idea to keep going there? Indeed what an age we live in. Someone posts an issue they had with a service, and one can not point out it might be worth not returning... And this is puzzling to people. I'm not understanding where you are coming from on this. Clarify? You took issue to my post, and one calling it first world problems. Your angle on all this is unclear.
stupidusername wrote: » Is that a rule or something? I would be significantly put out by someone doing that.
Andy Carroll wrote: » Because it's gender based discrimination obviously.
Andy Carroll wrote: » You should consider complaining any time you are in a place that only provides females with a baby changing facility.
Andy Carroll wrote: » Because it's gender based discrimination obviously. If someone offers a ****ty service to everyone, okay, just don't go there (though there must rules and regulations on facilities, quiet probably ignored in this country). If someone offers a ****ty service to one group and not another based on their gender or race, then we have a problem. That isn't too hard to wrap your head around is it?
Are you male or female out of curiosity?
IrishAm wrote: » Public bars and restaurants are not legally obliged to provide baby changing facilities. Its a service they choose to provide at their discretion. If the OP took them to court, citing this as evidence of gender based discrimination, he should expect to pick up all costs.
stupidusername wrote: » No I shouldn't.
Pushtrak wrote: » No, it isn't (too hard to wrap my head around, for clarification). Thank you for clarifying. I guess I am just trying to (over?)simplify it in to a matter of voting with your wallet. Availing of alternative places that deserve the customers. Oh, and my first post here wasn't in any way trying to devalue the thread in a "Oh, this shouldn't have been posted here, just don't go there". I actually find a lot of value in places being called out for sucky business practices. And think people should question whether they want to give money to whatever business on whatever basis. Male, and for full disclosure, I don't have kids.
Andy Carroll wrote: » Because it's gender based discrimination obviously. If someone offers a ****ty service to everyone, okay, just don't go there (though there must rules and regulations on facilities, quite probably ignored in this country). If someone offers a ****ty service to one group and not another based on their gender or race, then we have a problem. That isn't too hard to wrap your head around is it? If it helps you understand it, replace *Blocks door* - 'Sorry men can't use the baby changing facilities' with 'sorry, *Blocks door* 'Sorry, Black people can't use the baby changing facilities here. /shrug.' Are you male or female out of curiosity?
guppy wrote: » As a woman, I had to change my baby on my lap, in a cubicle many times. Not sexism, just piss-poor facilities. I dealt with it (as did many other women), why could a man not just adapt, as I, as a woman, as did numerous other women, had(have) to?
ahnowbrowncow wrote: » What don't you understand, providing a service to one set of people and not another is discrimination. Is it that difficult to grasp???