xflyer wrote: » With due respect that is nonsense. Weston was an very active airfield when those houses were bought particularly Weston Lodge. No one but no one could have any illusions about what they were letting themselves in for. Not only that it's complete exaggeration to say Mansfield ramped up development with bigger and noisier aeroplanes. The jets that fly in and out are easily outnumbered by a factor of ten or more by the smaller lighter aircraft that always frequented the field. There was an increase of use over the years simply as an natural progression of the increased affordability and popularity of flying I have to say I'm not interested in the view from your side of the fence. As someone who flew out of there regularly over the years. We've had your view beaten into us to the point where we often had to fly ludicrous and possibly unsafe noise abatement departures and arrivals. The airport and the operators bent over backwards to accomodate the locals. But it was never enough, far from seeing it at a welcome local amenity there was a sustained concerted and personalised campaign to close it down permanently. This is a common factor in all anti airfield campaigns. Unreasonable fears are drummed up and downright lies are told. The truth is invariably ignored. The debate was and is far from civil, your attitude notwithstanding. More like a lynch mob as I said earlier.
Suits wrote: » There isnt really a steady flow of jet traffic into weston though. If you buy a house beside an airfield you know what you are getting into, there is always the chance that you will have noisey planes overhead. Weston's noise abatement policy is a bit of a joke for pilots at present, we bend over backward and fly right to go left and vice versa. Residents just like to whinge I think.
emo72 wrote: » not quite accurate. "the clowns" in kew and weston bought their houses in the sixties and late eighties/early nineties and had no problems with the local airfield. weston was a welcome local amenity. no problems whatsoever. when mansfield took over and ramped up development and encouraged bigger and noisier planes thats when things got fractious. it would be nice to keep the debate civil as i am with everyone here. and if you are interested i will give you the view from my side of the fence. best of luck,
xflyer wrote: » As for the objectors, to hell with them particularly the clowns in Kew Park and Weston lodge who bought houses directly under the flightpath of an airfield then woke up to the fact that aeroplanes fly over them.
flyingpopeye wrote: » Any update in relation to the sale of the airport?
bombs away wrote: » What recent history exactly would you be referring to
BrianD wrote: » We all know the history of this airfield in recent times and quite frankly it's disgraceful
Quebec Delta Mike wrote: » "Weston in decline"...that must be music to the ears of all the objectors, nay sayers and begrudgers...oh and the wannabe TDs who make crass headlines in the local rags..."We will strenuously object to the sale of Weston..." etc etc etc.... Watch this space, as they say...:D QDM