ted1 wrote: » A house doesn't deprecate like a car does. (with the exception if those bought during the boom) Once you pay off the mortgage in x years you li e mortgawge and rent free. If your paying rent how on hell will you pay rent when you stop working. Also i'm currently paying 1150 a month rent. I just bought a house in a slightly better estate and my mortgage will be 750. A no brainer if you ask me.
Hayden Gorgeous Silencer wrote: » I fully intend on getting one when I can get a job back near home. I hate handing money over in rent when I know it could be going towards owning the place instead also the thought of renting all my life is awful.
Monty Burnz wrote: » Houses do depreciate, but perhaps not as fast as cars do.
Gurgle wrote: » Houses can, cars just do.
Monty Burnz wrote: » Well no, both do. You point me towards a house that doesn't depreciate, and I'll show you a car that doesn't.
Domo230 wrote: » A very subtle form of slavery.
foxyboxer wrote: » You can't do that with a mortgage (or death contract :eek:)
Domo230 wrote: » That's the ideal but it doesn't go that way for many. If I lose my job, I can pack up and move somewhere else and rent there. Or I can switch careers if my career sucks and take a pay hit without worrying. People on Mortgages can't. They are very restricted compared to renters. My parents have lost a lot of freedoms due to their mortgage so yes I do think it is a subtle form of slavery.
Domo230 wrote: » If I lose my job, I can pack up and move somewhere else and rent there. I can switch careers if my career sucks and take a pay hit without worrying.
Domo230 wrote: » I will have to go the long and difficult path towards saving for a house and paying upfront.
Monty Burnz wrote: » You rent either way. You rent either the house or the money to buy the house. That's what mortgage interest is - rent on the money. Bear in mind that - depending on interest rates - you can pay back a multiple of what the house costs. In the first few years, the overwhelming majority of your mortgage is paying the interest portion.
Wile E. Coyote wrote: » Just a tad overdramatic don't you think? I'll have my mortgage paid long before I'm dead (hopefully). Where are all the people currently renting going to live when they only have a pension to live off? That €200 a week pension isn't going to go very far.
Gurgle wrote: » Going to have to point you towards the 90s if you're comparing to the right now value. Any house bought up to approx 2000 is worth more now than it was then. Any car bought up to 2000 is worth a small percentage of its original price.
Hayden Gorgeous Silencer wrote: » Its still your house from day one though, you can repaint it, change it around, not worry about renewing a lease, getting thrown moved on when the landlords son/daughter wants to move in. Even better (and what my plan is) is you can build your own house exactly as you want if you chose. and as I said before in a lot of cases now, rent is more than the mortgage repayments.
ocallagh wrote: » Yes, 1150 is dead money Interest is also dead money A drop in your house price is dead money too The latter turns it from a no brainer into a high stakes gamble. The 12k you blow in rent each year is pittance if your property drops by 10% in the same period not to mention the money you wasted on maintenance, interest etc.
Stiffler2 wrote: » RENTING IS DEAD MONEY THERE - I SAID IT IN CAPS
Domo230 wrote: » I will go the longer and more difficult path towards saving for a house and paying for it upfront.
c_man wrote: » People with mortgages should be forced to wear a big 'M' on their person so that we may all deride them for being such fools. We can attach the Stone of Shame to special cases. "Rent is dead money? Well this is dead weight!"
Monty Burnz wrote: » MORTGAGE INTEREST IS ALSO DEAD MONEY. I said it in italicised caps.
Stiffler2 wrote: » Well - let's put it this way. My parents bought their house for 25k, it's worth roughly 400k now and they own it. Once I'm finished paying off my house in 30 years I paid let's say 350k for the house. In 30 yrs it'll proabably be worth 3 million if inflation is anything to go by from back when my parents bought to when I bought. So I'll own a house worth 3 million, I'll probably lease the bathroom and 1 room for a cool 100k a month in 30 years while you'll be out working at 80 to pay your rent. do you see ?
foxyboxer wrote: » If I were to lose my job, get defrauded out of savings, basically left with nothing.
golden lane wrote: » when my grandfather died...my uncle bought my grandfathers house.....i think i remember 600 pounds being mentioned.......the house is on lismore road in kimmage..... my auntie bought a house in kilmainham at about the same time....don't know how much.. how much are those houses worth today.....?????
Wile E. Coyote wrote: » You'd still have a roof over your head if you had a mortgage and could negotiate with the bank till you were back on your feet. You could even rent out a room tax free to give you an extra income.
foxyboxer wrote: » But in all fairness, how likely is that though?
foxyboxer wrote: » Ah now there are tenancy laws after all. And if you have a mortgage, you don't own the house and it's not an asset. Anything that takes money out of your pocket is not an asset. It is an asset for the bank and it's market value is the collateral for them in giving you the money in the first place. You own it when you get the deeds. You default? They take the house. You die? They cash in the life assurance they made sure you took out. I don't recall giving life assurance details when renting?