ninja900 wrote: » Saw an ad at a bus stop yesterday "Seven years isn't enough" and wondered WTF that was all about. Turns out it's a campaign from some group of oppressed welfare queens single mammies who want a meal ticket for life, no strings attached, for squeezing out a kid. They can fûck right off. Women who choose to work for a living don't get seven months of paid maternity leave never mind seven years. Fathers get no paid leave at all.
Suas11 wrote: » Chef ketchup is far superior to Heinz.
ninja900 wrote: » Saw an ad at a bus stop yesterday "Seven years isn't enough" and wondered WTF that was all about. Turns out it's a campaign from some group of oppressed welfare queens single mammies who want a meal ticket for life, no strings attached, for squeezing out a kid. They can fûck right off. Women who choose to work for a living don't get seven months of maternity benefit never mind seven years. Fathers have no right to paid leave at all.
token101 wrote: » Seven years of what? Do they get cut off at 7 years? And they are looking to get that increased is it? Regardless of a recession, 7 years is a long, long time to be without any kind of work. I'd agree with cutting anyone off after 7 years to be honest. Especially if it's consecutive w/o interruption of any kind.
IrishAm wrote: » Ireland has the same level of hot women as any other country in the world. If not higher than most! They seem to get a bad rep on this forum, but Irish women are great.
Nodin wrote: » So because one group of people get fucked over, we should make sure everybody gets fucked over. Good thinking there.
ninja900 wrote: » Going onto jobseekers allowance when your youngest child is 7 is hardly getting fûcked over, now, is it? At the moment the age limit is 18, or later if the 'child' is in full time education! And they want this crazy system to continue, unchanged. Some people really are out of touch with reality.
Nodin wrote: » So kids cost no money once they go past 7.....?
Paparazzo wrote: » They do. But get a job if you want to pay for them
Nodin wrote: » And if you can't get a job?
Paparazzo wrote: » If you can't get a job in 7 years you're probably aiming for jobs you're not qualfied for.
eldwaro wrote: » pink is a manly colour.
foxyboxer wrote: » /\/\/\/\ Careful men, he wets his pants.
psychward wrote: » Not Pants. Panties I bet .
Luckily, all our gender issues were heartily resolved by the 1910s, when it was decided that we'd assign colors to each "team": blue was for girls and pink was for boys. No, that's not a typo: A 1918 editorial from Earnshaw's Infants' Department stated that pink was "a more decided and stronger color ... more suitable for the boy; while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl." It makes sense: Pink is the color of a nice, raw, manly steak, or the blood of your enemies splattered on a white uniform.
The King of Moo wrote: » That's funny, I just read this article yesterday:5 Gender Stereotypes That Used to be the Exact Opposite
eldwaro wrote: » and then yore ma does the washin...weak at best but its late in the day
this time on infants - - explaining that young children haven't yet been socialized into gender roles by society, so their color preferences are innate.http://www.google.ie/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=infants%20boys%20do%20prefer%20blue&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CEwQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcuriosity.discovery.com%2Fquestion%2Fgender-colors&ei=_D6YT9nzCY6xhAf8jsX_BQ&usg=AFQjCNH-41enB4UJX3kqwg79gn9-bgqe5g The researchers suggest that women's preference for pink and red may come from their roles as gatherers in ancient times. Red is the color of many fruits and berries. It's also the color of children's faces when they're flushed. A 2003 study supports this; it found that women's eyes are physically attuned to see reds better than other colors. Men may prefer blue because it signified a good water source and good weather, but this could be an interpretive leap [source: The Guardian].
FIS income limits in 2012: If you have One child €506 Two children €602 Three children €703 Four children €824 Five children €950 Six children €1,066 Seven children €1,202 Eight children €1,298
psychward wrote: » But when my ma does the washin she doesnt have a big girls blouse to wash .. unlike yours :pac: haha
eldwaro wrote: » your ass :P
Pdfile wrote: » theirs a reason why when one turns to talk to me at the bar i laugh...
Nodin wrote: » If you bothered to read what the proposal was about (or even the last 10 posts) you'd have noticed that the 7 years refers to the age of the child, not the length of time the allowance was being claimed.
So kids cost no money once they go past 7.....?
