sunflower27 wrote: » How are they allowed to set up the tent on the road? That image just screams FOOLS to me.
Thoie wrote: » I want to know how they're able to set up the tent on the road - what's stopping it from blowing away?
Doc Ruby wrote: » You can actually. Needing the house for your own use or that of a relation is a legitimate legal reason for eviction in Ireland. And given they had two years to do it, well, I'm short on sympathy.
Halloran springs wrote: » Maybe, by principle of avoiding to pay their mortgage, they have indirectly discovered a way to avoid the laws of physics also ? Not sure mate There's more to this case than "meets the eye".
Thoie wrote: » In want of a better answer, I'm going to assume they're sitting on gold bullion.
Defiler Of The Coffin wrote: » They're making a right show of themselves. Have they no shame?
Milk & Honey wrote: » It is not a legal legitimate reason for eviction in Ireland. The only legal legitimate reason for eviction is because of a court order. A person who wants his tenant out in order to move in himself has to go through the same termination process as anybody else.
GarIT wrote: » I've been told before that it is in the constitution that if a landlord or an immediate member of his family becomes homeless he can evict any tenant without notice. I don't know if its true though, so does anyone have a pdf of the constitution anywhere?
outtagetme wrote: » Doubt it too. Wouldn't surprise me if they were holed up in some seedy digs like the Gresham or Westbury (on the credit card of course).
philstar wrote: » nice tent https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l2UEV_-Fu4
Ghost Buster wrote: » Have they no shame? They go from two people in a 5 bedroom house to two people in a 4 man tent...FOR SHAME!!!!!
cloud493 wrote: » What's the story exactly?
Milk & Honey wrote: » A two man tent should be enough for them!
NIMAN wrote: » It was shocking viewing, UNTIL I heard their history, and it does appear they were just greedy.
Monty Burnz wrote: » I don't really see why it was so shocking. Two people being gently escorted off a property. The only aggression was coming from the geriatric who kept running at the poor bailiffs yelling "f*ck off" and "get away from me".
Thoie wrote: » Likewise, the only shocking about it was the trespasser's bad behaviour, and the women interfering with the sheriff and bailiffs, and that wasn't so much shocking as disgraceful.
catthinkin wrote: » i feel sorry for them tbh yes they gambled and lost yes they are now making an un holy show of themselves yes they are cupable for the mess they are in BUT the nationwide bank and their advisors should be shot what utter madness to lend someone that kind of money based on a property portfoilio which was also indebted . I would love to see the financial mechanics which made the lending even possible ?? how did the bank even obtain insurance given the couples age ??? the Banks have never had their mortgage books opened and audited publically i am guareenteeing if they did we would all be horrified at the kind of lending pratices that went on in the good times . core principles of banking were ignored and twisted in every direction 10 times a person salary was being leant sheer madness .
mikemac1 wrote: » United Left Alliance - socialism for millionaires and landlords :rolleyes: