Turtyturd wrote: » I don't think he is finished... He was scoring right up until the move. I think if we had him and Suarez playing together now it would be a very effective partnership.
djPSB wrote: » Torres or Carroll lads? With the next 2-3 years in mind.
djPSB wrote: » I don't think we will ever see the old Torres again. His acceleration and pace are gone which were vital. If Carroll keeps improving, he will have far more to offer than Torres in a year or two IMO.
Dubit10 wrote: » Don't want him back at all. 50m was a fantastic piece of business tbh.
Turtyturd wrote: » It is possible that his injuries have taken their toll on him but it would be a huge coincidence that they did so at the same time as his move. As for Carroll I think what he offers is very limited, might do a job in some premier league games but could you imagine us progressing in the CL with him as our main striker?
rarnes1 wrote: » I'd imagine if we qualified for the CL we'd be able to attract a top notch striker tbf.
Grayditch wrote: » Has Torres even scored an important goal for Chelsea, yet?
djPSB wrote: » I'd probably take Torres for this season and maybe next over Carroll. But after that, Carroll should be coming into his prime and should be a far better option than Torres.
djPSB wrote: » I'd probably take Torres for this season and maybe next over Carroll.But after that, Carroll should be coming into his prime and should be a far better option than Torres.
Turtyturd wrote: » Genuine question...what exactly do you think he is going to offer..am I missing something?
5starpool wrote: » I've a bad feeling about the sting in the tail from Torres. He can score against us at Anfield in a 2-1 Liverpool win if he wants, but hopefully won't score against us in either game. Scappy 1-0 wins in both will be good enough for me. I wish he had never left though.