Sittingpretty wrote: » Baby is hungry? Baby gets fed. Love all the "but why can't you just plan ahead posts" clearly coming from people who aren't yet parents. Wait and see
Cheeky_gal wrote: » Couldn't believe it. I thought it was so ignorant.
nlgbbbblth wrote: » Entertaining thread. I don't think the OP is troll. It's pretty unfair to call someone a troll just because they post an opinion which differs from yours.
hondasam wrote: » Sittingpretty wrote: » Baby is hungry? Baby gets fed. Love all the "but why can't you just plan ahead posts" clearly coming from people who aren't yet parents. Wait and see I think it's parents who actually said this. Me being one of them. You can plan ahead babies do not need to be fed the moment they cry.
iguana wrote: » Dudess wrote: » To be fair, the OP was suspected of being a troll not because she merely holds a differing point of view, but because the language in her post looked like a pure wind-up. And the date probably made people suspect that too. That said I don't think she's a troll. I know someone who went to visit a new mother in her own home and asked her to go to a different room when she began breastfeeding.
Dudess wrote: » To be fair, the OP was suspected of being a troll not because she merely holds a differing point of view, but because the language in her post looked like a pure wind-up.
Chain_reaction wrote: » That line above there is why I'm calling it a piss take. Surely in this day in age someone couldn't think they'd get away with rolling out a line like that and not get a reaction. But as the last half of your post says.. Surely its ok to say that someone is uneducated.. When its fairly obvious that they are...
hondasam wrote: » I think it's parents who actually said this. Me being one of them. You can plan ahead babies do not need to be fed the moment they cry.
iguana wrote: » And the date probably made people suspect that too. That said I don't think she's a troll. I know someone who went to visit a new mother in her own home and asked her to go to a different room when she began breastfeeding.
ilovesleep wrote: » A restaurant is a place to go to, to eat food. I can't think of a place more suitable. Is she supposed to feed her baby in the jacks or something?
Sittingpretty wrote: » Well that's fantastic, for YOU. I'm sure u appreciate that not everyone is the same.
Gummy Panda wrote: » If I was in a restaurant and the baby started crying for a feed, I'd rather they pop the tit out and feed it. Breastfeeding I don't mind. Crying baby not so much..
I'm sorry everyone but I'm with the OP on this one ignorant or not I would prefer if it did not happen in the restaurant but then again kids in restaurants tend to annoy me anyway. Having said that I'm sure she was discreet about it but I also think she could have gone to a private location to feed the baby or fed the baby before she went to the restaurant.
hondasam wrote: » I don't mind it either and as I said mothers are always discreet about it. No one wants to hear a baby crying because it's upsetting for everyone.
ck83 wrote: » But it's quite difficult to listen to a baby crying when there's absolutely no need. In my opinion, it's unfair to a small baby to leave it go hungry for no reason, other than the possibility of offending some strangers. It's also difficult to hold a conversation in an already loud restaurant over the noise of a screaming baby. It's difficult to enjoy a meal when your baby is crying. Also, a crying child, in my experience, is far more disturbing to the general public than a breastfeeding mother. And attracting of a lot more disapproval. And those are the reasons why, when my baby started to cry, yesterday afternoon, in a busy restaurant, I breastfed it. Who knows, maybe I, and not cheeky gal, was the one who started this.
RichieC wrote: » believe it or not, shoitbags like "cheekygirl" would rather they feed the child in the jacks,
hondasam wrote: » We can agree that babies cry for all sorts of reasons not just because they are hungry. Baby crying does not mean ''feed me now'' waiting twenty minutes will not harm the baby. Can I ask you, did you know the baby would be due a feed in or around this time?
hondasam wrote: » Sittingpretty wrote: » Well that's fantastic, for YOU. I'm sure u appreciate that not everyone is the same. I do but YOU are the one who assumed that it was people who did not have children who said it. I don't expect every child or parent to be the same.
krudler wrote: » ^from this to the below in 25 pages, you should become a politician with that kind of policy flip flopping :pac:
hondasam wrote: » Give the OP a break, she worded her op a bit wrong. She has a different opinion than others, big deal it's a free country. Mothers can breastfeed in public and the general public can whine about it if they want. There are probably a few people on here who would not be happy if it happened beside them but would not say it.
Mr. Presentable wrote: » Apparently not. Apparently it is only a free country so long as the OP's prissy sensibilities are not offended.
hondasam wrote: » Like I said I don't mind it but would prefer it did not happen at the table beside me.
Cheeky_gal wrote: » Thanks so I'm a "sh*tebag" now that's lovely. Just another insult in this thread to add to the list. Can people not have a discussion without insulting one another?
krudler wrote: » so...you do mind it. how far away is acceptable before you stop minding. you'd see the same about of boob either beside you or at the far end of the room, next to none.
Dudess wrote: » And when it's a retarded opinion, people are entitled to argue with it.