RINO87 wrote: » Hey guys, me and a mate took a serious hammering down by the canal behind the roisin, close to the playground i think. Around 2.30 thursday night/friday morning, just after massimo. Just trying to piece things together as I can only remember coming to in hospital, my mate says there were 5-6 of em, may have been hanging around the area for a while. Anyone see anything?? Any info appreciated as I was out cold and havent a clue what happened. Dental bill aint gonna be cheap.
RINO87 wrote: » was talking to the guards and to say they were unhelpful would be putting it nicely. I'll leave it at that.
inisboffin wrote: » OP - If the Guards refuse to help at all, they are not doing their job! I'm sorry this happened to you, and it *should* be investigated. I know you said you'll leave at at that - but just know, if you were assaulted they *should* do their job.
BhoscaCapall wrote: » OP was obviously drunk, and is probably a young adult. Some people have this attitude that if a young person has been drinking, nothing they say is worth listening to. It's happened to me before trying to talk to bouncers because I've left a jacket inside or something, they just shove you out the door. It is possible to be drunk and responsible, but you can't really expect a Guard or bouncer to be able to process this in their tiny minds.
BhoscaCapall wrote: » Sweet rant and all, but if you read my post again you'll find that it's supporting the OP.
inisboffin wrote: » There's a big difference between leaving your jacket in a pub while messy and being beaten unconscious. I'm not even sure which point you are making. Just because alcohol was involved in a crime does not not take away the fact that it was a crime. Both parties (assuming, we don't know this) having had 'drink taken' has nothing to do with the fact that someone got hurt. If an assault happened and someone was hospitalized, it needs to be investigated, whether the OP was drinking Jagermeister or peppermint tea that night is irrelevant - end of.
skelliser wrote: » the guards wont deal with this on the nite and when drink is involved. They usually wait until the next day to start taking statements. you can apply for victims of crime compensation to help with your teeth.http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/justice/victims_of_crime/victims_and_compensation.html best of luck
Discodog wrote: » I appreciate that you don't want to bash the Guards but it is their job to investigate & apprehend. If you don't pursue this then people will continue to be fobbed off. Go to Mill Street, with your mate & make full written statements. Also put in writing that you were very dissatisfied with the way that the Guards acted on the night. Make it clear that you expect the Guards to investigate & you will make a formal complaint if they do not. Ask to speak to a senior officer & make it clear that you were treated badly.
skelliser wrote: » less of the keyboard warrior stuff. The Guards know how to do there jobs ffs!! would you take statements from people in distress and under the influence? no you wouldnt you would come back the next day or whenever. They also only have limited resources and its not there fault the judiciary give out lenient sentences.
Wompa1 wrote: » My friend just got jumped in Woodquay by two guys. It's pretty sickening.
Irishgoatman wrote: » Only just seen this thread and find one posters comment hard to believe. BhoscaCapall said, in an earlier post, that the unlucky person "was obviously drunk". Years ago I was knocked down by a car whilst on my way home and all I remember was lying in the road being attended to by an ambulance crew I'd had 2 pints. The brain, fortunately, doesn't remember some painfull incidents.
BhoscaCapall wrote: » Yeah, because people leaving Massimo's at half 2 in the morning had obviously just popped in for a couple pints at 1 in the morning :rolleyes: I didn't say that because OP was drunk that it was in any way their fault. In fact, the entire point of my post (missed so spectacularly by inisboffin) was that being drunk does not automatically mean you are not being responsible, but unfortunately some goons (like bouncers and Guards) do not understand this.
BhoscaCapall wrote: » Yeah, because people leaving Massimo's at half 2 in the morning had obviously just popped in for a couple pints at 1 in the morning :rolleyes:
Irishgoatman wrote: » I understand what you are saying but it is wrong to assume that someone was drunk. I've a friend in the U.K. who, due to having had a kidney transplant, does not drink, but he still goes to pubs and night clubs, which always, of course, makes him a designated driver!.
antoobrien wrote: » I've been in Karma as a dessie, does that automatically make me a drunk for leaving at closing time?
BhoscaCapall wrote: » Ah yes, how silly of me to assume that someone leaving a pub at 2.30am is drunk when you have a friend with a rare condition that means he cannot drink :rolleyes: Hopefully not. Would you like to provide some more ridiculous examples which do nothing to disprove anything I've said?