gamgsam wrote: » If it works for you, more power to you
gamgsam wrote: » Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » What in particular doesn't make sense? The part where he claims that an inner silence exists. Also when he says that by analysing a sunset it immediately loses its beauty. Throughout the speech he makes huge presuppositions without backing them up at all. In order to follow his logic, you have to accept everything he says as truth. As analogies they are fine but he presents them as rock solid facts. Which they are not. That said, he's a good speaker and nice to listen to, but I'm lucky enough to know how to be happy without wasting time on abstract thought like this If it works for you, more power to you
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » What in particular doesn't make sense?
Red21 wrote: » ...my girlfriend who i've been with for the last seven years and love very much, finds what Tolle has to say completely meaningless. It's kinda strange.
Biggins wrote: » Red21 wrote: » ...my girlfriend who i've been with for the last seven years and love very much, finds what Tolle has to say completely meaningless. It's kinda strange. Not really, your girlfriend might have discovered that she don't need his mental stuff to prop her up intellectually, emotionally and validate her way of getting through life. She is her own person more so and is able to fend for herself without other possible unnecessary rubbish.
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » ...Your perspective should be the observer of your thoughts and emotions when they arise and not to resist them.
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » You seem to be criticising what Tolle teaches without understanding what he teaches. By definition you can't prop yourself up intellectually by taking on board his teachings.
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » Bla... bla... ...thoughts and emotions when they arise and not to resist them.
Biggins wrote: » Not really, your girlfriend might have discovered that she don't need his mental stuff to prop her up intellectually, emotionally and validate her way of getting through life. She is her own person more so and is able to fend for herself without other possible unnecessary rubbish.
gangs am wrote: » Throughout the speech he makes huge presuppositions without backing them up at all. In order to follow his logic, you have to accept everything he says as truth. As analogies they are fine but he presents them as rock solid facts. Which they are not.
Red21 wrote: » I don't have any grand ideas about myself, actually i'm very easy going and down to earth, i'm not 100% sure what you mean by this but i'm fairly sure you have made some pretty big assumptions, i'm only saying what the content of these books were like for me. Apart from here and my girlfriend I don't really ever mention ET to people in general. Whats the point? what he's saying, which is the same as has been said by others for thousands of years is out there and available to anyone interested (ET points this out all the time). I also find it very strange the contrast between those who are interested and those who think it's nonsense. You could say, look at the contrast between those into astrology and those who aren't, but this is just not the same, when I get to know someone I able to make a very good guess as to weather, they are or aren't into artrology, where as the same cannot be said for those into ET or similiar type writters.
Earthhorse wrote: » I would say they are very much analogies and not meant to be taken literally.
gamgsam wrote: » Earthhorse wrote: » I would say they are very much analogies and not meant to be taken literally. Fair enough, point taken. But I do have a question for you... How'd my name get turned into gangs am :pac:
Earthhorse wrote: » It's up to each person how much time they put into it. I found reading his book actually freed up time for me because it helped me stop dwelling on things so much. The difference between Tolle and cults is that there aren't any recorded cases of Tolle preventing people from disengaging with his material nor of people having to hand over all their earnings or even anything close to that so it's a bit of a false comparison to be honest.
Biggins wrote: » You have thought too much about this! Take a break - have a pint - relax and come back with a more explanatory post! I disagree with your suggestion by the way. Frankly I think Eckharte Tolle alone has thought too much about this and is full of over intellectual, self-important, crap. What's he selling? Books? Videos? Tour of speaking to the public? Meh!
ygolometsipe wrote: » I only watched 40 seconds and I was ready to throw a bick at the laptop.:mad: He is one annoying gob****e!!
take everything wrote: » I think you're dismissing it out of hand unfairly.There is something to be said for a greater awareness/understanding of the role of your thoughts and emotions.
take everything wrote: » I think you're dismissing it out of hand unfairly. There is something to be said for a greater awareness/understanding of the role of your thoughts and emotions.
lividduck wrote: » Well, you could join the Labour Party:D
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » Probably because your ego fears stillness, stillness reveals your mind made identity to be nonsense. That's why people feel "awkward" silences. The ego is being exposed in that silence.
Biggins wrote: » My overall concern is a number of things when I come across material such as his - and I admittedly can be very wrong in the following. 1. ET trying to get his ideas and theory's out there for if one looks, for the sake of profit and raking money in by clearly profession applied ways. (Reminds me personally of the marketing and methods of the Scientology cult immediately, in revenue collection. Something I have studied for decades and personally involved in curtailing.) 2. The fact that in learning all this stuff and it taking up so much of ones time that instead of living a life, ones life is just spent more so on this stuff than living it.
Biggins wrote: » Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » ...Your perspective should be the observer of your thoughts and emotions when they arise and not to resist them. Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » You seem to be criticising what Tolle teaches without understanding what he teaches. By definition you can't prop yourself up intellectually by taking on board his teachings. Any chance of speaking in words that make plain sense instead of talking in proverbial riddles? What the fcuk are you on about? ...But for alone every six months, you can learn more and sound like your talking in riddles too!https://www.eckharttolletv.com/join/ ...After you have bought the DVD's, the books and then subscribed to other material also! Get your checkbook out folks! Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » Bla... bla... ...thoughts and emotions when they arise and not to resist them. ...So his teachings have thought you that when you get the emotion to kill, you should just go out and go it? Stop listening to this daft stuff and go out and get a life!
chin_grin wrote: » Prefer a bit of Alan Watts meself. (The waves look like bewbs.....teeheehee). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLrMVous0Ac
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » You can choose to be comfortable with the way things are by being present. Thoughts cause most suffering.
Dostoevsky wrote: » His book, The Power of Now, is however well worth reading.
ygolometsipe wrote: » Dostoevsky wrote: » His book, The Power of Now, is however well worth reading. why?
Scanlas The 2nd wrote: » It can alter your way of being/living to make you enjoy life more and reduce your anxiety, depression, embarrassment etc.