ItsAWindUp wrote: » Meat is only tasty when processed. Non meat products can be processed to taste the same.
Kiera wrote: » I’d love a bit of meat in me.
Keela11 wrote: » Personally I believe anybody in the western world who eats meat is selfish and stupid.
Owen_S wrote: » Can any vegetarians explain why they are vegetarians, but not vegans?
Rabidlamb wrote: » Isn't it great being top of the food chain
El_Dangeroso wrote: » The beef industry lobby is NOTHING compared to the soy industry lobby (Monsanto, hello?)
El_Dangeroso wrote: » .. and again the beef industry lobby is not an advocacy group for omnivores, just beef processors.
El_Dangeroso wrote: » These two posts display the ignorance propagated by vegetarian groups that all people are either vegetarians or they eat nothing but industrial junk-food.
TheZohan wrote: » Didn't watch that moovie you linked either, was afraid it might be a virus.
--Kaiser-- wrote: » I'm not interested in 'neccesary'. Humans are an adaptable species and can survive on a wide variety of foods, but I'm not interested in just surviving either. I'm interested in eating the optimal diet for the human animal, i.e. as close as possible to what we've been eating for 100,000 + years, not evolutionarily novel diets like western diet (with lots of grains) or veganism or vegetarianism. It's not possible to get it exactly like what a 'caveman' would have eaten, but you can get close (BTW we've been cooking food for around 150,000 years).
(I don't think anthropogenic climate change is far-fetched, I just don't think it has been proven.) As El Dangeroso said, we could go back and forth with studies refuting each others statements but I don't think there is a point. I have never been as fit, healthy or energetic since I started eating a paleo diet and that is a good enough reason for me.
El_Dangeroso wrote: » The fact that certain nutrient deficiencies are more common in vegetarians leads me to think that on average, most vegetarians are not meeting those needs. .
grindle wrote: » True. I am one of those carnivores. I've saved two friends from vegetarianism. That makes it all worth it. And it's logically impossible to either understand or respect the choice of vegetarianism. It's an irrational choice, and I respect their right to make the choice, but you don't have to respect the choice itself. Same if somebody ate everything but rice. They can choose that, but it's an irrational choice, which you'd hardly look at, stand back, and go "That guy's really stickin' to his guns about rice. I respect his distaste for the grain."
RussellTuring wrote: » Do you think the animals you eat are no more conscious than rice?
Mr.Biscuits wrote: » I never said that Beef Industry councils were not as bad Monsanto (I believe they are) but I merely pointing out that your: 'omnivores have no advocacy, lobby groups and propaganda machines' statement was a bogus and nonsensical one.
El_Dangeroso wrote: » What you are saying is totally nonsensical. You really need to go and look up the definition of advocacy group and then tell me why a beef industry lobby group is an advocate for omnivores but a soy industry lobby group is not an advocate for vegetarians.
Mr.Biscuits wrote: » Will you quit putting words in my mouth please. When and where did I say anything about a soy industry lobby group not being an advocate for vegetarians?? I actually said I agreed with that point.
El_Dangeroso wrote: » It's the same thing as saying the beef industry lobby is a omnivore advocacy group.
Rabidlamb wrote: » Had a homemade burger last night ..... homer droooooool Even knowing that most of it was probably cartilage & grizzle didn't take from the enjoyment. What hope do the vegetarian lobby have when even the bad bits taste so good. Probably too weak to lift their skinny fingers & type.
Mr.Biscuits wrote: » No it's NOT the "same thing" - how could it be? I never said (nor implied) that Monsanto were not an advocacy group for vegetarians, nor anything close to it - so quit implying that I did. My point, which you seeme to have missed in your determination to put words in my mouth is that meat eaters do have "propaganda machines" and "advocacy groups" on "their side". If you want to agrue about Monsanto and Soy industry lobby groups - grand, just go and do it with people that have stuck up for them, I didn't.
El_Dangeroso wrote: » Jeez, you really don't get it. I am saying that the beef lobby industry is no more a 'propaganda machine' as you call it for meat eaters than Monsanto is a 'propaganda machine' for vegans, it's an analogy like. Just because you eat something a company makes does not make them an advocate for your beliefs, how hard is that to understand?
blatantrereg wrote: » You didn't say that though. Not until this very post. In fact you suggested that vegans benefit from organisations such as Monsanto, PETA and the ALF [which I dont think is the case at all]. If that really was what you meant to say - that the beef industry is no more a propaganda machine for meat eaters than Monsanto is for vegans - well you should look at your own ways of expressing things. Because it really didnt come across from any of your previous posts.
El_Dangeroso wrote: » Really what can I say, I don't think there's a face-palm big enough to respond to this.
ItsAWindUp wrote: » it is however very graphic but its the truth and its what happens everyday, to billions of animals kept in filthy conditions for human greed.
Gummy Panda wrote: » Yeah factory farming in US.
ItsAWindUp wrote: » Gummy Panda wrote: » Yeah factory farming in US. So what, you think its massively different over here?
Gummy Panda wrote: » Yeah I do.
ItsAWindUp wrote: » So what, you think its massively different over here?