merlante wrote: » I don't buy distance arguments. 160km or 1hr 50mins to Dublin, 1hr 50mins to Cork, and both airports there, with a regional airport a few miles out. Waterford is well enough connected. The other arguments don't seem to make much sense on the face of it either. Seems like there would be more people in the south east looking for work or job options, which usually means lower labour costs. Plus people will travel for work. It disgusts me to see Enda welcome call centre jobs in Waterford, which, lets face it, are the bottom of the barrel, with a half-life of about 3 years, whilst Dundalk gets a cracking company with plans for expansion. Every call centre job that gets announced hurts Waterford's chance of getting real jobs. Sorry if this offends people who work in call centres, but you can not base your economy around these jobs. They are mostly low skilled, provide bugger all secondary jobs for the most part, and disappear as soon as contracts are terminated. Manufacturing would be better. IT, pharma, etc., is what we really need. This FG whooping over the Rigney Dolphin announcement was awful in this respect. (By the way, if the Rigney jobs are higher skilled, I will happily stand corrected.)
hardybuck wrote: » Trust me, you'd be surprised how big a factor that travel times play in decisions such as this. Aside from the extra 50 mins closer each way Dundalk is to their Dublin base, the company HQ is in California. Dublin or Shannon are the only transatlantic airports we have. Cork has quite limited options in comparison to Dublin and Waterford Airport isn't even worth mentioning. I work for a multinational organisation with locations in every province in Ireland. When we fly we generally do so from Dublin. When we have visitors we generally meet them in Dublin. If you are located in the other sites you just have to cope with the extra commute as part of your working day.
ex_infantry man wrote: » i,m guessing u work for msd?
Sully wrote: » You cant force a business to locate in a specific area. If the business wishes to go to Dundalk, so be it. The government will always welcome any type of job creation. Waterford is suffering, they got a bit of a boost with jobs, and it was welcomed. Its normal. People would moan if they didn't anyway.
para45 wrote: » Dundalk has 3 international airports within a 1hour travel time . Dublin in 45 minutes Belfast city 1hr international & Belfast Aldergrove ( Also international ) ANd just over one hour from Blanchardstown And a very good Motorway all the way that connects Dublin with Belfast. Dundalk is a very good spot And the main reason for ireland is that we are the only English speaking country in the EMU which makes communication easy with the USA and obviously the good tax breaks that makes most USA countries also choose is as their EU headquarters if the HQ are based in a English speaking country like USA canada , Australia, South Africa etc
Sully wrote: » Why would the government offer a deal just because Waterford is complaining? The government wants to secure jobs. They couldn't give a ****e where they were once they stayed in Ireland. These businesses probably already get incentives to locate here, but I don't expect the government to say "We will do X, Y and Z if you locate in Waterford". If a company believes Waterford has potential, they will investigate it and see if it meets their requirements. We don't, end of story. Waterford was never in the picture and I would imagine PayPal & other similar companies wanted to locate near Dublin which caters for everything rather down in Waterford which doesn't.
merlante wrote: » But unless there is a clear cut sentimental reason why a company would want to choose a particular location (e.g. State Street is Kilkenny is down to a nice holiday taken by executive) then, let's face, there's bugger all difference between one town and another.
AdMMM wrote: » A company I worked for in Dublin recently moved offices a mere 8 miles away and the extra time it takes to get to Dublin Airport nearly made them reconsider the move as a big part of their operation is having executives travel between Dublin and London to work their 9-5. I'm not surprised that Waterford wasn't even considered for something like this.
merlante wrote: » That's absolute nonsense Sully. Locations that are relatively weaker economically should be prioritised for investment. It is the job of the government to ensure that all parts of the state are allowed to progress more or less equally. Back in medieval times, cities fought for commercial privilege, but in the era of the nation state, the state has the largest say about how the entire area is developed commercially. That state also controls all infrastructure spending. States can and do use tax breaks to focus investment in particular areas. This happens in Ireland right now, from the Shannon Free Zone, to the incentives available from the EU for the BMW region, to other breaks that are offered to companies on an ad-hoc basis.
robtri wrote: » firstly it is great to see some new jobs on this scale anywhere in ireland... as too waterford... available office space is a major problem in the city and surrounds... there is nothing currently available in the 40,000sq.ft and above office space market..
guv999 wrote: » Agree. I believe that the office and building situation is a major barrier. We may well have the skills and a great motorway to the capital city, but unfortunately not the office space. Look at the building Sky are moving into in Dublin. http://www.burlingtonplaza.ie/gallery/ We certainly have the skills for these jobs, (ex TT staff would be ideally suited) and would be cheaper than Dublin but do not have the space.
calvin_zola wrote: » political clout is non existent aswell in Waterford.
Sully wrote: » You cant force a business to locate in a specific area. If the business wishes to go to Dundalk, so be it. .
para45 wrote: » I do think that we should all be unhappy when Jobs or investment come to Ireland thats not were we are located . Its not positive to be bitching and breaking other counties down just because we not living in them or from there . yes location does play a good part but its also the deal thats done at that point between the players. Goverment , landlords and investors It might be more constructive to promote the Ireland of ireland as a good destination and not spend so much time to criticize the choices of Investors . At the end of the day they want to invest and cant make everybody happy . Its all about more jobs and revenue for ireland One poster made a valid point about the state of some towns and the attractive ness to investors when they decide locations. This might be another point to be looked at by the IDA in improving generation to obtain investment? i dont think that the person from paypal thats the spoke person with the North east accent hadnt much choice or influence as these things are decided by the big boys /gals and is more a coincidence. Maybe that person lives in Dublin now and will be inconvenienced by the travel hahahaah Lets be happy for Ireland and hope for more investment all over the country!!!!!!!!!!:) And lads i hope you get a good turn in Waterford also!!!!
merlante wrote: » That's absolute nonsense Sully. Locations that are relatively weaker economically should be prioritised for investment. It is the job of the government to ensure that all parts of the state are allowed to progress more or less equally. Back in medieval times, cities fought for commercial privilege, but in the era of the nation state, the state has the largest say about how the entire area is developed commercially. That state also controls all infrastructure spending. States can and do use tax breaks to focus investment in particular areas. This happens in Ireland right now, from the Shannon Free Zone, to the incentives available from the EU for the BMW region, to other breaks that are offered to companies on an ad-hoc basis. Of course, the company has the final say, but the government plays a huge role. If you don't agree with strategic planning, maybe you'd be happier in Fianna Fail.
Max Powers wrote: » The problem is sully that the IDA has a political agenda, pressurised by politicians, the IDA stats show the lack of FDI visits to the SE and Waterford is out of skew with all other regions. How can we get FDI if we are not even on the company radar. We can compete if we have a level playing field.