RadioRetro wrote: » Man who broke into house and gets to keep it.
RadioRetro wrote: » "Living in the country we didn't have any" money. Yup, money's just for city folks, y'hear?
signostic wrote: » What she said is true...in the 60`s there was not very much..the dilemma of girls who got pregnant outside of wedlock was so different than it is now.
AngryBollix wrote: » I find it very difficult to understand how so many mothers would willingly hand over their children perhaps it was just a sign of the times
signostic wrote: » One has to remember that McQuaid was in power in these times
sudzs wrote: » They reallu hadn't much of a choice.
AngryBollix wrote: » What did their families do?
europa11 wrote: » So much for the "good old days".
eviltwin wrote: » Willingly? You having a laugh? There was no choice, you face being disowned, there was the social stigma, no lone parents etcI had my child in 1997 when I was a teenager and even then faced huge pressure to have her adopted and that was 30 years later!