Paparazzo wrote: » You should tell more people this, it'll end obesity overnight.
Seomra Mushie wrote: » Anyway we all know it's "simple" but it's not really, is it? Obviously there's other things going on with the morbidly obese.
Seachmall wrote: » Eat more than you burn and you'll put on weight. Eat less than you burn and you'll lose weight. Eat as much as you burn and you'll maintain weight. People who whinge about metabolic rates just aren't factoring their metabolic rate into the above. It's that simple, it really is.
Seomra Mushie wrote: » psychological causes
LeighH wrote: » Don't get me wrong, I comfort eat, my weight goes up and down at times, but I'm aware its my own fault and I don't let it go too far before I reign it in. I don't think depression rates are anywhere close to obesity rates. Also, plenty of depressed people are slim, so I'm not buying that obesity is due to mental illness. As with everything, there will be exceptions.
stupidusername wrote: » I think men should do the chasing, not women.
Zorbas wrote: » Irrespective of sex or drive, the one that has highest body mass should do the chasing.
Fear Uladh wrote: » That only works if if the lad is good looking. Otherwise he is just a stalker.
stupidusername wrote: » Zorbas wrote: » Irrespective of sex or drive, the one that has highest body mass should do the chasing. you mean if the woman is physically bigger, she should? Fear Uladh wrote: » That only works if if the lad is good looking. Otherwise he is just a stalker. That is true. Either way it should still be the man. A girl should always know when a guy is interested. If she doesn't, then he's doing it wrong.
Mike 1972 wrote: » The atomic bombings of Hirishoma and (particularly) Nagasaki didnt appreciably hasten the end of the Second world war and the notion they did is simply propaganda to justify a war crime against a civilian population.
steddyeddy wrote: » Agree with that yea but some women just like the attention and nothing beyond that. Some men chase the same women forever and some women like that. There has to be a balance!
stupidusername wrote: » That is true.
dr.bollocko wrote: » Mike 1972 wrote: » The atomic bombings of Hirishoma and (particularly) Nagasaki didnt appreciably hasten the end of the Second world war and the notion they did is simply propaganda to justify a war crime against a civilian population. On the other hand however. The casualties total in the immediate aftermath of the two bombings would not have amounted to much more than those amassed from a few further weeks of the B52 bombs that were setting Japanese cities alight at a huge rate. These cities were all seen as legitimate targets in some form or other because of their production of weapons. At least that is how it is legitimised. Or try and figure out a way of successfully defending against the kamikazi tactics which were in full use at the time. Picture a barely trained 18 year old pilot who is essentially guiding a missile to its target. At this stage the Americans enjoyed completely unmolested air superiority and treated all merchant ships carrying goods to Japan as enemy targets. If you want to look at war crimes against a civilian population look at the B52 bombings ordered for months and months before the Japanese subdued. However if you want to look at the other side look at the massacres perpetrated by the Japanese on US POW's or Filipino citizens or during their occupation of China where they had deployed a huge amount of their troops even as all the major cities of Japan burned. The endgame in the Pacific was bloody and brutal and consisted of many battles where precious little tactical gains were made for many many losses on both sides. However to suggest that the US committed war crimes any more than the Japanese is simply untrue. Would suggest Nemesis as a decent account detailing all aspects of the end game. It makes Stalingrad look like Ann and Barry though.
Toby Take a Bow wrote: » So, only if the guy is good looking should he chase the girl? Introducing subjectivity here is a dangerous thing.
stupidusername wrote: » oh dear. It was a joke. generally guys that are obsessive about a girl can be split into two groups - flatteringly interested (good looking) and stalker (ugly). I didn't come up with it ya know, it's one of them things.
steddyeddy wrote: » Private schools are massive wastes of money both on parents and the state. I dont see the point of them but im open to suggestion maybe theres something I dont see
Grimebox wrote: » steddyeddy wrote: » Private schools are massive wastes of money both on parents and the state. I dont see the point of them but im open to suggestion maybe theres something I dont see Just look at the CAO statistics. A much higher percent of people who to go private schools end up going to college. There are obviously exceptions to this (Colaiste Eoin and Colaiste Iosagán in Dublin) How are they a waste of money on the state???
