TheRoadRunner wrote: » Yes he will be eligible to run. Not too sure if the IOC has a similar ban as BOC regards olympics but I guess he would be selected for IAAF events by AAI. Think you have this one wrong. As far as I remeber Lombard was offered a place at world xc after winning interclubs in Belfast but said he had other more important things to concentrate on such as his job.
mithril wrote: » http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/athletics/7275480.stm This is the article I was thinking of. Legal advice was sought by the OCI as to options for excluding Lombard from the Olympic team if he met the A standard but it was a moot point for Beijing in his case since he did not qualify. Its conceivable Fagan could meet the A standard in 4 years time in which case the OCI would try and exclude him.
rovers_runner wrote: » Do you think it's ok for people who get caught out breaking the rules to blame depression and think it will excuse their actions? How am I a disgrace for dismissing his explaination as an excuse?
gerard65 wrote: » So he does not get caught. Go's to the olympics, wins gold and lives happily ever after. All wrapped up with a nice bow. Well, except the other guys in the race who were clean.
Oldtrier wrote: » You miss the point, I am not saying it is right. If the athletics bodies decide 2 years and athletes serve the ban are they not to be allowed back? If that is the way then there should be a life ban. You can only serve the sentence you get. If someone serves a jail sentence are they never to be allowed take a normal part in society? My point was that O'Riordan seems to have a completly different attitude to Fagan and Lombard.
SWL wrote: » I don’t recall the same level of sympathy for Michelle Smith when she was in the dock..
SWL wrote: » Must say I am astonished that so many people are happy to see Martin back running after his ban is very disappointing. I wouldn't say I am happy to see dopers back. But if the ruling bodies give 2 year bans all the athletes can do is serve the ban. Are you saying there is never a comeback. People commit very serious and violent crimes and get a finite sentence. Is there never to be any forgiveness for doping?
myflipflops wrote: » I don't recall Michelle Smith ever admitting to doping, She still denies it to this day and still holds 4 Olympic gold medals.In short, she never gave anyone any reason to have sympathy.
Oldtrier wrote: » SWL wrote: » Must say I am astonished that so many people are happy to see Martin back running after his ban is very disappointing. I wouldn't say I am happy to see dopers back. But if the ruling bodies give 2 year bans all the athletes can do is serve the ban. Are you saying there is never a comeback. People commit very serious and violent crimes and get a finite sentence. Is there never to be any forgiveness for doping? Yes I believe life bans should be issued, 2 years is not a strong enough deterrent, look at cycling still suffering as a sport becasue of pr1cks.
SWL wrote: » Why becasue she didn't say she was depressed or becasue she didn't admit the acquisitions held against her. either way in my opinion same outcome sought to gain advantage unfairly.
myflipflops wrote: » Of course, I have no idea how you can compare the 2 situations. Cathal Lombard is the one where you can compare the reactions. Firstly, there is a huge amount of weight put onto people who openly admit it when they get caught. They are few and far between. Mainly though, people aren't thinking 'I have sympathy for Martin, he used EPO'. We are thinking 'I have sympathy, he was deeply depressed, he was at the lowest possible ebb'. The ban he will receive is fully right. I don't think anyone, Fagan included, is arguing against the punishment.
SWL wrote: » I don’t believe that depression can affect your judgement to that extent that you will sacrifice all your hard work and talent.
jeffontour wrote: » Well then in my opinion you don't understand depression and should ease off on the statements of what actions it could or could not have lead him to. It sometimes leads people to take their lives so believe me it can lead people to do things they would otherwise not.
meemeep wrote: » But there was no need for any closer monitoring as people in Ireland were made aware of the illicit stuff on his personal credit card as soon as he placed the order Outside lane - can you explain that one? Surely that would be illegal - to monitor someone's personal credit card history and pounce. Surely there would need to be a warrant to do that?
SWL wrote: » I am fully aware of depression and its outcomes, there are different levels or stages of depression which is why I don't understand why someone can seek medical help and then claim that it’s the illness that lead them to take EPO rather than admitting it was taken to gain an unfair advantage which has nothing to do with depression as an illness.
tunney wrote: » Lets all make/accept all the excuses and welcome him back with open arms. That sound like a plan that suits people here.