timewilltell wrote: » I would look gud with_______ for 2012 if i get same person 5times i hav to ask em ou Jesus wept.
leggo wrote: » In fairness, that stuff was all the rage when I was around 12. But why are you friends with 12-year olds???? :P
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I mad bro.
membersonly wrote: » I've check this person's friend list they aren't in fact friends with Sir Alex Ferguson so I don't know how he think the fiery scot is going to see this message:eek:
membersonly wrote: » This ****e is rife tonight..Just not good enough,,fair play newcastle yee deserved that,,gotta get the cheque book out SIR ALEX eh,,do it ta ****I've check this person's friend list they aren't in fact friends with Sir Alex Ferguson so I don't know how he think the fiery scot is going to see this message:eek:
Ficheall wrote: » Here, clearly.
inlikeflynn86 wrote: » Not a status, its a pic, of a family around a hospital bed with an old frail woman lying in it dying, and the family posing with her.... Comments underneath were RIP ***** xxxx you were not gone 24 hours after this was taken xxxx Personally I dont think its right....
Missmiddleton wrote: » "The most horrible feelin ever...having a hole in your sock " you can't make this sh*t up
face1990 wrote: » When I saw these, I had to screencap them. Both from the same person:
WindSock wrote: » Looks like they are taking the piss. The first post in the second link is written in non rtrdspk and has the correct use of an apostrophe /analcnt
Ficheall wrote: » Is that how one makes the distinction these days? Well, in that case there are 2 apostrophes missing in the first post in the first link, and 1 missing in the first post in the second link. Though I'd agree, they do look a bit too thick to be true. There are people that thick out there though, so...
WindSock wrote: » Yeah I would be sceptical whenever there is an apostrophe used at all, even just the one, followed by xxxtreeem txtspk. And that looked a bit extreme.
EarthlyPangaea wrote: » And I got this gem earlier: who would pay to see a film about a **** like margaret tatcher how it ever got made is beyond me This coming from a guy who as far as I can tell has no interest in film-making beyond whatever dross Michael Bay releases every so often.
who would pay to see a film about a **** like margaret tatcher how it ever got made is beyond me
EarthlyPangaea wrote: » Conversation attached. So much fail.
Ficheall wrote: » So... whose posts in that conversation are the dumb ones, in your opinion?
face1990 wrote: » One more, from the same person again, this time having the most vomit and cringe-inducing love-up with their significant other:http://i40.tinypic.com/2r3h5kj.jpg I don't see the point in unfriending people like that! It's free entertainment.
Gophur wrote: » It must be great craic/fun/frustration (strike out which is not applicable) playing scrabble with these clowns?