nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Naked women a turn off

Scanlas The 2nd

Anyone else think women are much sexier in sexy clothes than being naked. I actually don't think I find naked women sexy. It's an anti-climax.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

pragmatic1 wrote: »

Nope. Men dont give a **** about make up, clothes, nails, etc.

Was this decided at the latest Man Convention? I must have missed the vote where "we" as men decided this to be "our" opinion.

Clearly, there are external factors other than a woman's body that influence attraction. Women wearing certain clothes, make up etc is linked to some of our most primal instincts.

leggo wrote: »

I wouldn't find naked women a turn-off now, but I kind of see the OP's point. I get much more turned on when I'm with a woman and she's dressed in sexy underwear, when you have her naked it's kind of "well that's that so!" Whereas there's still an element of a chase, a goal, before you get her naked. I suppose the best way to sum it up is that the prospect of getting a woman naked is more arousing than actually having her naked. The journey is more important than the destination and all that.

And shur, as long as everyone comes, it's all good.

In general I would say the reason for this is you're either not seeing enough naked women, or you're seeing too many.

not enough = women hot dressed
too many = used to seeing model-types / reality can't live up to fantasy

Always thought with glamour models and the like that it's actually more hot when the bewbs are almost visible, like in a really tight bra or something, rather than full-on hanging out... In other words, sexy 'Nuts' photo > Page 3. *

*I'm not a pervert, I swear!:p

Micky Dolenz wrote: »

Women dress for women.

Most Men don't give a damn about stretch marks, or a ittle bit of softness around the middle. Most are just happy to get the chance to see and feel it.

All those body things that women find annoying about themselves, most men hardly notice.

Moral of the story, get nekkid ladies.

Kind of agree with this but I'd say it's more of a case that men notice the positive and don't worry as much about the negative, whereas women are pressurised into trying to have the perfect body and instead focus on their imperfections. E.g. If a woman has nice eyes and a stunning bottom but is a bit round in the middle, lads will like fancy her for the eyes and arse and not really focus on the perceived flaws but they'll hate their body for the middle.

When gals I know ask me for feedback on what to wear/how they look etc, I always tell them to pick a battle and make their positives stand-out (I'm straight, I swear, just have too many female friends that they've rubbed off) rather than trying to cover up things they don't like.

flutterflye wrote: »

The point is that we can make ourselves out to be nearly flawless, with great bodies with the help of special bras and control pants etc...
But there is no airbrusing reality when it comes our naked bodies - there is nothing we can do to hide our imperfections when it's all stripped off.

I wouldn't agree with this either. I think leggo's post is closer to my own attitude . I love the thrill of the chase and there are some ways that a woman can dress that I find really, really sexy. I obviously still find a naked woman's body nice, but I can see the OP's point.

parker kent wrote: »

Was this decided at the latest Man Convention? I must have missed the vote where "we" as men decided this to be "our" opinion.

Clearly, there are external factors other than a woman's body that influence attraction. Women wearing certain clothes, make up etc is linked to some of our most primal instincts.

If you're into womens clothes, make up and nails. Yeah you must have been at the other mans convention. I believe it was hosted by Gok Wan.

Scanlas The 2nd

I remember the last woman I had sex with who I was attracted to in clothes I literally felt nothing looking at her naked. I actually didn't want to go through with having sex, but just went through the motions anyway.

Scanlas The 2nd wrote: »

Anyone else think women are much sexier in sexy clothes than being naked. I actually don't think I find naked women sexy. It's an anti-climax.

Man card. Now.

Scanlas The 2nd wrote: »

I remember the last woman I had sex with who I was attracted to in clothes I literally felt nothing looking at her naked. I actually didn't want to go through with having sex, but just went through the motions anyway.

Why didnt you find her attractive naked? Were her boobs not as nice? Did she have a dodgy looking lady part?

Johnny Foreigner

Kiera wrote: »

Why didnt you find her attractive naked? Were her boobs not as nice? Did she have a dodgy looking lady part?

Lady part?
I never heard that one before. That cracked me up.
I have heard some funny ones over the years; minky, front bottom, honeypot, box, gash, axe wound, etc but that's a good one.
Maybe lady part is what they call a vagina in D4?

Scanlas The 2nd wrote: »

I actually don't think I find naked women sexy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37OWL7AzvHo

Johnny Foreigner

Personally I like a woman to dress up, in exactly what I have told them to wear.
I am very specific, and find it a turn on to tell a woman exactly what she will wear. Some women like a man to be dominant and decide what they are allowed to wear. Then they deliberately wear something different so that they can be punished for it.
I like women to wear something. One of the sexiest things a woman can wear is her man's shirt with nothing else.
Its about the mental turn on, not just the physical. Men are more visually stimulated than women, but women need to be mentally charged for sex to be explosive.
I remember going out to dinner with a girlfriend once and during the meal she told me she wasn't wearing any knickers under her skirt. It mentally turned both of us on.
Sometimes a woman not being totally naked can be more sexy. For example if they keep on their stockings, suspenders, and high heels.

Johnny Foreigner wrote: »

Lady part?
I never heard that one before. That cracked me up.
I have heard some funny ones over the years; minky, front bottom, honeypot, box, gash, axe wound, etc but that's a good one.

I've heard of it before. Minky, no.

Ok lads Ive figured it out, Its all about being primal and the hunt, When the girl is dressed you have to find ways to get her out of her clothes (Hunt), Where when she is naked you just enjoy it and on to the next hunt, Your all welcome:D

Micky Dolenz wrote: »

Women dress for women.

I see this often on boards and think it's bull tbh!

OP, nearly every one of your posts is about your views on women or how to pick them up.

Seriously sounds like you have issues with women, you need to get a hobby /get out of the house and speak to human beings (maybe even real women)

What's what in the butt, i say what's what in the butt

Deleted User wrote: »

I see this often on boards and think it's bull tbh!

Fair point. Not all women but certainly some. Thats not a bad thing, wanting to look better then someone else is normal enough.

I'd be the same tbh, naked women are a bit boring. The fun is in the transition from clothed to naked.

Deleted User wrote: »

I see this often on boards and think it's bull tbh!

Well I think many women do, because there's lots that go with the latest fashion, and considering how ridiculous a lot of that stuff looks, it has to be for other women, almost as in a competition, for who has the trendiest stuff.

I dress sometimes for myself, but a lot of the time for men too. I try to wear what accentuates the good - bum, general shape, femininity etc. - and so that really is about displaying to the male.

^ Wow gotta respect peoples honesty, most women I know would never admit to such a thing.

stupidusername wrote: »

Well I think many women do, because there's lots that go with the latest fashion, and considering how ridiculous a lot of that stuff looks, it has to be for other women, almost as in a competition, for who has the trendiest stuff.

I dress sometimes for myself, but a lot of the time for men too. I try to wear what accentuates the good - bum, general shape, femininity etc. - and so that really is about displaying to the male.

Like that French Maids outfit?

Never in my life dressed for women - happy to admit I have dressed up to look attractive to the opposite sex though. I'm skeptical when a woman says she would never ever consider male approval when dressing up. Even if it's not the main priority, it's surely some element of it - if perhaps subconsciously.

Sisko wrote: »

^ Wow gotta respect peoples honesty, most women I know would never admit to such a thing.

thanks.

PK2008 wrote: »

Like that French Maids outfit?

yep

nah I don't dress like that normally, after all my bum is my best asset, so it's jeans most of the time.

stupidusername wrote: »

thanks.

yep nah I don't dress like that normally, after all my bum is my best asset, so it's jeans most of the time.

Pity my New Year's resolution was no more "pics or GTFO" posts :pac:

up for anything

Naked men are funny. Even those Greek and Roman statues of beautiful men with defined muscles, glorious six-packs and buttocks to die for, can't disguise the fact that those meat and two veg are risible. Keeping them hidden in baggy boxers is the way to go.

Naked woman a turn off,

How will the OP procreate, sex while fully dressed I suppose is possible.

up for anything wrote: »

Naked men are funny. Even those Greek and Roman statues of beautiful men with defined muscles, glorious six-packs and buttocks to die for, can't disguise the fact that those meat and two veg are risible. Keeping them hidden in baggy boxers is the way to go.

Source.

From this vast array of XXX-rated artwork we can make a few deductions about Greek aesthetic preferences, genitaliawise (here I mainly follow Kenneth Dover's landmark study Greek Homosexuality, 1978): (1) Long, thick penises were considered--at least in the highbrow view-- grotesque, comic, or both and were usually found on fertility gods, half-animal critters such as satyrs, ugly old men, and barbarians. A circumcised penis was particularly gross. (2) The ideal penis was small, thin, and covered with a long, tapered foreskin. Dover thinks the immature male's equipment was especially admired, which may account not only for the small size but the scarcity of body hair in classical art. A passage from Aristophanes sums up the most desirable masculine features: "a gleaming chest, bright skin, broad shoulders, tiny tongue, strong buttocks, and a little prick."

There ya go!

Dudess wrote: »

Never in my life dressed for women - happy to admit I have dressed up to look attractive to the opposite sex though. I'm skeptical when a woman says she would never ever consider male approval when dressing up. Even if it's not the main priority, it's surely some element of it - if perhaps subconsciously.

Me either. I couldn't give two shiney shytes what a woman thinks of what I'm wearing. Once I'm happy in what I'm wearing, then who the fuck else matters. I won't deny it, I despise clothes shopping with a passion, and probably wouldn't be the most imaginative when it comes to clothes, but then again they've never been a priority for me. I've a tendency to dress in block colours, because I'm not arsed.

I think if you have a half decent face / body you'll look well in just about anything, I don't need to dress myself up like a fucking christmas tree to be noticed. I've boobs and a bum, and they've yet to go against me.

And closer to the topic, I love watching a guy trot about in the nip. The body is a work of art