nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Is a girlfriend worth it...

hoorsmelt

...or should I just stay a w@nker- being a w@nker is a lot easier than trying to please someone else. Why should I bother with women when I can spend my days on RedTube?

ps- How bout dat for 300 posts bitches :cool:

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

wandatowell

Can somebody direct me to the **** forum please??

Eric Cartman

wandatowell wrote: »

Can somebody direct me to the **** forum please??

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=1146

wandatowell

Eric Cartman wrote: »

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=1146

LOL, you never fail to disappoint Cartman

[Deleted User]

No.

And this is from the girl's point of view.

Dudess

Lia_lia wrote: »

No.

And this is from the girl's point of view.

Why?

Only thing worse than such stuff coming from men is when it comes from women. So, you wouldn't consider yourself worth it as a girlfriend?

parker kent

Kiera wrote: »

All you lads are missing in your posts is "Irish". I'm sure someone will bring the subject this way....

Not many Irish girls in porn. So they may not have, ahem, came across very many Irish girls.

amacca

Dudess wrote: »

No you haven't.

in fairness you don't know that

his seemingly wild boasts could be true or he could be a singleton jockey that refers to his horses as women

its probably that last one...I'm 95% certain I am!

Saila

parker kent wrote: »

Not many Irish girls in porn. So they may not have, ahem, came across very many Irish girls.

Im waiting for when one of them say "wait wait I can totally do this" in a cark accent while trying to deepthroat

stovelid

lusaka wrote: »

haha!! it sounds like an over sensitive and emotionally unstable girlfriend is right next to you as you write this. she probably thinks you are great now for saying that and might suck your d!ck for once now lol.

She would probably batter you and all your pseudo-player gimp virgin pals with one hand behind her back. But then the ease of that would barely constitute a task.

Kernel

I used to be a wanker, til I took an arrow to the knee....

Kiera

Saila wrote: »

Im waiting for when one of them say "wait wait I can totally do this" in a cark accent while trying to deepthroat

Cant deepthroat a cocktail sausage :P

amacca

Ah some girlfriends are definitely worth it ......there's lots of decent women about

I just wish I could get one at the moment.

Trouble is some other b@stard is always going out with them........too many competing men, now that's the real problem.

I need a man cull not involving me.......

Benny_Cake

amacca wrote: »

Ah some girlfriends are definitely worth it ......there's lots of decent women about

I just wish I could get one at the moment.

Trouble is some other b@stard is always going out with them........too many competing men, now that's the real problem.

I need a man cull not involving me.......

Apparently there are more men than women leaving the country at the moment so the government must be trying to sort this out for you!

Fear Uladh

Dudess wrote: »

Only thing worse than such stuff coming from men is when it comes from women.?

What a kuntish post! :rolleyes:

BBDBB

of course its worth it

even if it fails at least you then learn to appreciate being single even more

parker kent

Fear Uladh wrote: »

What a kuntish post! :rolleyes:

In fairness to her, this is an entire thread basically saying women are horrible and it is preferable to **** than have a girlfriend. So she is hardly striking the first blow, just responding to the brain dead posts here.

Dudess

Fear Uladh wrote: »

Dudess wrote: »

Only thing worse than such stuff coming from men is when it comes from women.?

What a kuntish post! :rolleyes:

Care to explain how? Or are you also bitter towards women and not liking the way such attitudes are being rightly challenged on this thread?

Fear Uladh

parker kent wrote: »

In fairness to her, this is an entire thread basically saying women are horrible and it is preferable to **** than have a girlfriend. So she is hardly striking the first blow, just responding to the brain dead posts here.

Not really, people are entitled to opinions, however stupid they may be.

What I've noticed about Dudess is that she comes across a bit hypocritical in her posts. Saying that "not all women are like that " while in the same thread saying what I quoted.

Equality...only when it suits.

amacca

Benny_Cake wrote: »

Apparently there are more men than women leaving the country at the moment so the government must be trying to sort this out for you!

finally my tax euros appear to be working for me

who would have thought destroying the country through mismanagement would be necessary for me to get a ride.

some lads can just walk into a bar and pick someone up I need mass emigration and a double digit unemployment rate.

Saila

Kiera wrote: »

Cant deepthroat a cocktail sausage :P

I didnt think there were any small dicks in porn

Fear Uladh

Dudess wrote: »

Care to explain how? Or are you also bitter towards women and not liking the way such attitudes are being rightly challenged on this thread?

No I won't explain. I would rather suffer from scabies than have a pointless debate with you, considering that anyone who disagrees with you is a woman hating bitter virgin misoyginist.

Do as I say not as I do mentality.

Over and out.

Eric Cartman

parker kent wrote: »

In fairness to her, this is an entire thread basically saying women are horrible and it is preferable to **** than have a girlfriend. So she is hardly striking the first blow, just responding to the brain dead posts here.

i think youll find that i just suggested women of loose morals, the OP's dilemma is whether or not to find a girlfriend in order to have sex, unfortunatly the social construct thats been bet into women and men is that commitment is needed in order to have sex, in a more open society in which these views werent forced the OP could procure some sex freely without monetary exchange or the archaic concept of monogomy. The OPs post as well as my reply is merely a satire on how redundant monogomy is, and only for the social pressures involved the OP would not have to resort to **** for his sexual needs , instead he could benefit from the help of female friends or strangers

Dudess

Fear Uladh wrote: »

parker kent wrote: »

In fairness to her, this is an entire thread basically saying women are horrible and it is preferable to **** than have a girlfriend. So she is hardly striking the first blow, just responding to the brain dead posts here.

Not really, people are entitled to opinions, however stupid they may be.

And people are entitled to challenge them.

What I've noticed about Dudess is that she comes across a bit hypocritical in her posts. Saying that "not all women are like that " while in the same thread saying what I quoted.

Huh? What was wrong with what I said and where did I say not all women are like that? Like what? How is that hypocrisy?

Equality...only when it suits.

Where did I say anything about equality? Explain your babble - please.

btard

Anything that can bleed for a week and not die is not to be trusted imo. Safer to have a **** OP.

Dudess

Fear Uladh wrote: »

Dudess wrote: »

Care to explain how? Or are you also bitter towards women and not liking the way such attitudes are being rightly challenged on this thread?

No I won't explain. I would rather suffer from scabies than have a pointless debate with you

Ah I see - you can't.

So you admit you were talking through your hole.

considering that anyone who disagrees with you is a woman hating bitter virgin misoyginist.

Anyone who disagrees with me? Nah, just the ones who say hateful sh1t about women - as you well know. Seems ya agree with them too.

Over and out.

People who can't support their wild claims usually say that.

parker kent

Fear Uladh wrote: »

Not really, people are entitled to opinions, however stupid they may be.

What I've noticed about Dudess is that she comes across a bit hypocritical in her posts. Saying that "not all women are like that " while in the same thread saying what I quoted.

Equality...only when it suits.

That reply doesn't really make much sense given what I said. So not sure why you are bringing up whether people are entitled to their opinions. I don't really see where anybody said otherwise. Just as they are entitled to their opinions, others are entitled to point out opinions that they think are idiotic, insulting or just downright ridiculous.

Also, I'm not entirely sure what post of hers you are referring to with that point. As far as I can see, she hasn't even said that sentence in this thread.

Also, I've disagreed with her plenty of times. Yet she hasn't called me a bitter, woman hating virgin. Funny that.

BBDBB

Dudess wrote: »

Ah I see - you can't. So you admit you were talking through your hole.

Anyone who disagrees with me? Nah, just the ones who say hateful sh1t about women - as you well know. Seems ya agree with them too.

People who can't support their wild claims usually say that.

hey OP, have you thought about Dudess as g/f material???

worth a punt

Kiera

Saila wrote: »

I didnt think there were any small dicks in porn

There are small dicks in every walk of life, grasshoppa.

Micky Dolenz

I've a headache.

Defiler Of The Coffin

I am not seeing much impartiality in this thread. Therefore I suggest both men and women withdraw from this debate, it is the only way we can have a rational argument on the subject.