Podge_irl wrote: » Unfortunately, not being able to prove it's false isn't really a high enough standard to print something though.
Amalgam wrote: » http://www.broadsheet.ie/2011/12/05/down-the-memory-hole/#comments Article blurred out in archives now.. with the words: 'Legal Retraction' visible. All very odd.
The Sparrow wrote: » If only the Irish Times had followed this mantra, they wouldn't be in the mess that they are today.
Podge_irl wrote: » I don't even remotely understand this. If the IT had followed that mantra to the letter they would never have printed her article in the first place. The only reason they were able to was because it was anonymous. If people can't see that the situation changed when her identity and the company became known then I really don't know what to say. I imagine these are the same people who'd complain about a newspaper printing allegations or stories without getting sufficient evidence for them first.
raindog.promo wrote: » Surely they should have left the piece as anonymous and not printed the follow up article. How did they fail to see the issues that the follow up article would raise?
jerry2623 wrote: » At the end of the day It was KATE who decided to bring so much pain and hurt to her family and friends not the Irish Times or The communications clinic. Kate decided to not stand up for her seriously damaging allegation. People including her family now giving out about the IT altering her last statement to the world seem to ignore that one fact. At the end it was She herself decided to kill herself and people around her should not be blamed for thatThe fact that she appeares to have written the article less then 4 hours before doing this act speaks for itself about her state of mind .
Cianos wrote: » No, it speaks volumes for her commitment and bravery to be able to produce such an article considering what she was going through.
grizzly wrote: » In fairness to the Irish Times it would make for a very difficult legal battle. It would be the word of someone on longer living against their employers – hard to fact check such information.
raindog.promo wrote: » http://transcriptionsdb.blogspot.com/2011/12/newstalk-breakfast-interview-with-kate.html Transcript of Newstalk Breakfast interview with Kate Fitzgerald's mother.
grizzly wrote: » Many people would say that this factor would negate the validity of her story unfortunately – not of sound mind and all that.
jerry2623 wrote: » However ultimately the sad and pathetic part of her brain took over and she killed herself blaming Terry Prone or The Irish Times for this flaw is blatantly unfair .
mhge wrote: » No one forced her to work there, it's true. But one can wonder how it a young person of (as reported) exceptional integrity and intelligence could by affected by working for a spin factory & conflict of interest central. Seeing first hand every day how nasty and bent her passion - politics - is in real life. It's not an influence that can be measured and no one can or should be held accountable, it's just life and life decisions. But I really pitied her in this aspect.
jerry2623 wrote: » we all just have to make the best job we can of it which thankfully most of us do. Sadly for us all Kate did not
jerry2623 wrote: » grizzly wrote: » Many people would say that this factor would negate the validity of her story unfortunately – not of sound mind and all that. Which is what I was trying to allude to without been hurtful
Lollipops23 wrote: » She never blamed TCC or Terry Prone. She was already ill and merely highlighted her employers' attitude towards mental illness.
jerry2623 wrote: » Pathetic and sad is what it is and I do not intend to dress it up as anything else
jerry2623 wrote: » Judging from the majority of comments on this thread and Breakingnews.ie people seem to blame both the Irish Times and Terry Prones for her death...
Dudess wrote: » Read this thread again - people aren't blaming her employer for her suicide. I thought it might happen but it hasn't. People are just angry at the censorship that ensued. Saying nobody forced her to work in the industry is of no use. You could say that about anyone who works in any job. And you don't appear to understand what depression does to people.
Dudess wrote: » The passive-aggressive snideness is strong in this one. Most of us don't have crippling depression.
Podge_irl wrote: » The situation is exceptionally complicated. However, I can't help but feel people are rushing to blame the IT a bit too quickly. They've handled the whole thing poorly, but I think the attacks on them are a bit much. The complaints about their apology are misguided. Perhaps, in this situation, the Irish Times are actually right and there were factual errors in the original letter. The IT don't generally publish anonymous articles for this reason (amongst others). People are also jumping to conclusions because they don't like the company involved. The fact that the girl is dead is a tragedy, but it doesn't automatically mean her words are indisputable fact either.